Wednesday, December 26, 2012

CRACKER? Saints and Soldiers


                “Saints and Soldiers” is “based on true events” centering on the Malmedy Massacre in the Battle of the Bulge.  It was a very low budget film (less than $1 million), but did well at film festivals winning numerous awards.  The cast is as low rent as you can get.  It was released in 2003.  It is the rare war movie that has overt religious overtones.
                The movie opens with the exhumation of bodies at Malmedy and then flashes back three weeks to the massacre.  The massacre breaks out when one of the Americans tries to escape and is shot.  Another G.I. grabs a gun and shoots a captor and the Germans open fire with machine guns.  (This is uncomfortably close to the way the S.S. defendants excused their actions at their trial.)  Some of the men successfully run away, but over 80 of the around 120 are killed and some of the wounded are executed with a bullet to the head. 
                The movie follows the quartet of Deacon (Corbin Allred), Gunderson (Peter Ashe Holden), Kendrick (Larry Bagby), and Gould (Alexander Niver).  Deacon is shell-shocked from an incident where he accidentally killed a family.  He is religious and often reads a book that turns out to be the Book of Mormon.  He gets into some interesting discussions with the atheist medic Gould.  Gould is from Brooklyn (of course, since this is a small unit movie).
Winley unhappily infantry
                The trek back to American lines is fraught with peril, naturally.  They spend some time in the floor space of a home when Germans arrive.  They hook up with a British pilot named Winley (Kirby Heyborne) who has valuable information that is needed back at headquarters.  They head out to “Saving Private Ryan” style music.  The soldier talk is realistic and helps with character development.  Kendrick and Winley dislike each other so we have the required dysfunctionality. 
Deacon to Gould:  "convert or die"
                They stay at the home of a French family.  Winley impatiently leaves in a snow storm. Germans arrive again.  When they attempt to rape the woman, Deacon shoots one, but the other escapes (but Deacon never misses, so what’s up?).  They can’t track him (in the snow?), but Winley arrives with the German in tow.  Deacon recognizes him as a fellow Mormon named Rudy from a pre-war mission.  What a small world!  Good thing Deacon sometimes misses.  Deacon sets Rudy loose in exchange for directions because it’s the Christian (I mean Mormon) thing to do.
Deacon returns fire
                Suddenly Germans open fire and Gunderson is killed.  A fire-fight ensues with SPR type graphics.  The grenade explosions are especially cool.  After frantic evading, they run into Rudy who shows them a jeep they can use.  They drive through no man’s land with both sides trying to kill them.  The jeep crashes and Deacon stays behind to give covering fire.  Gould and Winley make it, but Deacon does not.  Winley’s information, as we all know, allows the Allies to win the Battle of the Bulge.  Gould takes Deacon’s Book of Mormon.
                The no name cast acts well.  The movie also makes good use of numerous reenactors and authentic weapons.  The action scenes are surprisingly good considering the low budget.  They are obviously influenced by SPR.  The cinematography is fine.  The setting is snowy (it was filmed in Utah) which adds to the atmosphere, but is inaccurate as to the Malmedy Masssacre which was not snowy.
a contemplative Gould
                The religious theme of the movie will not be for everyone, but I did not find it overbearing.  Although the movie was produced by a Mormon company and the ending seems to be aimed at recruiting converts, you have to listen carefully to catch that Deacon is a Mormon.  Most viewers will assume he is simply a Christian and that the book is a Bible.  Gould represents the atheist view gamely.
              As far as accuracy, the movie is pretty commendable.  The main characters are fictional, but some of the events are authentic.  There was an incident when a small group hid in a basement while Germans dined overhead.  there also was an account of an American who missed a German soldier and then later when he was captured, it turned out they were if the same faith.  The Malmedy Massacre is fairly close to the real thing.
                The movie does not belong in the 100 Best War Movies list, but it is well worth watching and you have to admire what they were able to produce for less than $1 million.
 
grade =  B-
 
 
 

6 comments:

  1. I still get comments on my review of this because I criticzed the heavy religious tone. A mormon company? Now that explains a lot.
    It has it's moments but it's not top of the range for me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I did not find it that heavy-handed. You have to really pay attention to get that Deacon is a Mormon and it definitely is not a recruiting film for Mormonism. When you consider the fact that most soldiers in combat tend to be more religious than the average man, you could argue that the vast majority of war films downplay religion unrealistically. I also find that the overt religiousity is balanced by having an atheist character. It is even rarer in a war movie for a soldier to be openly atheistic.

    When you consider bang for buck, this movie is high in dollar value.

    BTW there is a prequel called "Saints and Soldiers: Airborne Creed". I will attempt to review it soon. Any predictions on whether the religiousity will be more or less?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Malmedy massacre not snowy? Did you look at any of the actual photographic evidence of the trials. It was very snowy and the whole battle was during bad winter weather.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dude, do you think I would make such a "mistake" without reason? Surprisingly, the field where the massacre occurred was not covered by snow at the time of the murders. The pictures you refer to were taken when the bodies were discovered a month later. Now that I think about it, it is totally understandable that any filmmaker would choose to show the field snowy because that's what the viewers would be comfortable with.

      Delete
    2. Actually dude(really dude, how old are you), I was talking of photos from the U.S. national archives showing front line conditions in Belgium dated 16 and 17 dec all showing snow on the ground. It was not deep but it was snowy in most areas. The deep snow did not arrive until closer to the 25th but yes it was snowy in malmedy on the 16 and 17 of dec according to photos of the area taken at that time.

      Delete
    3. My research is based on eye-witness accounts.

      Delete

Please fell free to comment. I would love to hear what you think and will respond.