“The
Lives of a Bengal Lancer” launched a subgenre in 1935. It was such a box office success that it was
followed by a series of similar movies like “Gunga Din” which are collectively
known as the British Imperial action/adventure subgenre. Otherwise known as the “handsome British
colonialists slaughtering inferior brown people” subgenre. It is considered by many to be the best of
the lot. Today these movies are
considered very politically incorrect and the last time a film of its type was
made was “The Man Who Would Be King” which was actually critical of the pro-Western
attitude of the previous films. (That’s
one reason TMWWBK is such a great movie.)
The movie is set in northwestern
India during the British Raj (the time from 1858-1947 when England ruled
India). The Bengal
Lancers are stationed near the Khyber Pass and are being threatened by a pesky
local chieftain named Mohammed Khan (Douglass Dumbrille) who for some reason
does not like the foreign occupiers.
There are snipers in them thar hills.
One of them kills the head of a column and a Lt. MacGregor (Gary Cooper)
disobeys orders to lead a cavalry attack to rout the enemy, thus establishing
himself as the stock insubordinate warrior.
Back at the base, the movie
develops into a buddy film as MacGregor is joined by the wet-nosed Lt. Alan Stone
(Richard Cromwell) and the sarcastic glory-hound Lt. Forsythe (Franchot
Tone). MacGregor and Forsythe immediately butt heads. I wonder if there will come a time when they
will learn to respect and depend on each other.
Stone is in a different dysfunctional relationship. His father happens to be the commanding
officer, Col. Stone (Guy Standing).
Daddy is none too happy to see his son and is determined to not show him
any favoritism. “There is no room for
sentimentality in the Army.”
the three amigos |
The unit is sent to deliver an
ammunition caravan to an emir. The
countryside is beautiful (the movie was filmed in California, but it doubles
well for India). At a banquet featuring
lots of local color, Alan meets the suave Khan with his arm candy. They go on a pig hunt that includes beaters,
elephants, and lancers. Go to the
theater – see the world.
Hey baby, I'm going to be Gary Cooper |
When his son is captured by
Khan, Col. Stone refuses to take the bait and rush to his rescue. MacGregor and Forsythe see the chance for a
great adventure and oh, by the way, he is our roommate. Oops, they get caught too. Stone is tortured (sadly off camera). This is the movie that gave us “We have ways
of making men talk”. Stone cracks and
gives up the ammunition caravan. This
will be bad because now the brown people will have fire power, too!
Do we really need this tripod? |
Somehow our trio gets loose
before the outmanned Lancer rescuers launch a suicide attack on Khan’s
fortress. MacGregor gives the future
John Rambo an idea by lifting a Vickers machine gun avec tripod (65-80 pounds) and
firing from the hip. They blow up the
ammunition as the Lancers charge into the fort.
There are lots of dead brown bodies lying around, but sadly, one
handsome white body. Back at camp, the
trio all get medals with one of them getting a posthumous Victoria’s Cross.
The movie is very old
school. The deaths are bloodless and
there aren’t even bullet holes. There is
a mix of schoolboy humor and young male adventure. The action is pretty intense and is
entertaining.
The movie is well made. Henry
Hathaway was an underrated director. The
studio gave him a big budget so the sets are extravagant. Although not shot on location, Hathaway
visited India to get the look right and he used documentary-style footage shot
in India. The costumery makes the film
look authentic. The film was nominated
for Art Direction. It is a colorful
film. The cinematography is fine.
The acting is strong. This movie made Gary Cooper a superstar. Tone is a good foil and they have the
appropriate buddy chemistry. Dumbrille
is very effective as the villainous Khan.
He plays Khan as suave and intelligent, not a fanatic (unlike most
villains in the upcoming subgenre entries).
The movie reminds me of old school Westerns where the bad guys (the
Native Americans) are actually the aggrieved party.
The theme of the movie is “for
the good of the service”. You also get a
dose of no matter how much you may dislike your bunk mate, you’ll still give
your life for him. The movie throws in a
lame father/son subplot. As far as the
theme that the natives need to be civilized, it might be interesting to note
that Adolf Hitler loved the movie because it depicted a small British force
controlling the inferior people of India.
The movie was required viewing for the S.S.
Antique or classic? Both.
The colonial attitude is quintly shameful so that makes it an
antique. However, being the progenitor
of a subgenre makes it a classic. Watch
it for the adventure, but feel guilty at the same time.
grade = C+
I'm not so sure about this. Should I want to look more into movie history I might give it a try but for purely personal pleasure? Would I like it?
ReplyDeleteNo. Considering your latest trend in reviews, this would be a major departure for you.
ReplyDeleteSurely a guilty pleasure! As you hinted at, the whole Afghan/Pakistan setting doesn't look that bad. My guess is that's due to one of the writers, Achmed Abdullah, whose bio reads like a novel. I prefer this one to Beau Geste and The Real Glory, also with Cooper.
ReplyDeleteColonial war movies before the Bengal Lancer didn't show such a jolly mood - Ford's Lost Patrol and Sternberg's Morocco are still in a post-WWI atmosphere.
But after this one, there was indeed a whole wave of colonial war/adventure movies - which also struck French, British and German cinema in the late 1930s. It seems really odd retrospectively, as this vision of war as something 'easy' would certainly clash with the bitter realities of World War II...
Interesting comments. Abdullah is indeed an intriguing figure. Thank you, Nem.
ReplyDelete"Watch it for the adventure, but feel guilty at the same time." Great line that sums up my attitude to a lot of the classic war movies.
ReplyDeleteDitto.
ReplyDelete