On the tenth day of
Christmas, my true love gave to me – ten cockleshell heroes a kayaking
“The Cockleshell Heroes” is the
story of Operation Frankton from WWII.
The operation was a famous British commando raid on the port of Bordeaux
in 1942. The canoes the Royal Marines
used were codenamed “cockles” to attempt to place mines on ships in the port. The film fits comfortably into the suicide
mission subgenre. In fact, the mission is borderline insane and yet based on an actual mission. You have to admire those British balls. It was directed by
Jose Ferrer, who also stars in it. He
walked out on the film when the producer added some humor to the script. The movie was a box office success and is
considered a classic.
Maj. Stringer (Ferrer) has a
plan for an audacious raid on blockade runners at Bordeaux. He is a “team coach” and does not think the
men need any of that silly hard-core training. Being a civilian in wolf's clothing, he has this quaint belief in democracy.
His exec Capt. Thompson (Trevor Howard) is old school and their
relationship is awkward. Thompson does
not like temporary warriors who are glory-hounds. When the first practice mission is a flop,
Stringer surprisingly agrees that Thompson was right and initiates a standard
war movie training program that culminates with the obligatory bonding through
brawling scene in a pub with some sailors.
They are transported to the
French coast by submarine so why not throw in a depth charge scene? They are not in any real danger since the
German depth charges explode on contact with the water.
It does afford the opportunity for one of the men to get a concussion so
the desk-bound Thompson can go on the mission.
They launch in broad daylight. 10
men in 5 cockles. One of the canoes
flounders and the crew are captured. And now there are eight. The
Germans give them a questionnaire to fill out.
Damned Nazis! The remaining eight
hide during the day, but leave before dark.
(The lighting budget must not have been enough.) Since it is so light, one of the canoes is
spotted and a sentry shoots a rower and his partner blows up the fake patrol
boat. The crew of the third boat are
caught, but blow up their pursuers to allow the rest to proceed. Sacrifice – a suicide mission staple. The last two canoes complete the mission in
broad daylight. Only Stringer and his
mate make it to Spain. The four captives
are executed by firing squad.
The film is fairly
accurate. It gets the basics right and
does a service to the participants.
However, it does jazz up the tale quite a bit. Stringer is based on Maj. Hasler who led the
mission and served as a technical advisor.
His exec Capt. Stewart did not go on the mission and I will assume
(until I do my History or Hollywood research) that there was no personality and
philosophy clash. The mission was not as
exciting or suspenseful as the film, of course.
There was no submarine episode.
No Germans were killed by the intrepid Marines, so the patrol boat and
pursuer scenes were faux. The planting
of the mines was not as fraught with peril and did not have the explosive
payoff the movie implies. In reality,
several ships were damaged, but none seriously and the raid was not a game
changer. The executions of the captives
is true, although not timed with the explosions.
“The Cockleshell Heroes” is
another cult movie that only cult members get.
In my opinion, it is nothing special.
In that respect, it reminds me of “The Devil’s Brigade”. Frankly, it lacks suspense and character
development. Stringer and Thompson are
developed, but the rest of the squad is cursorily handled. You get the class clown, the cuckolded
husband, and the gruff trainer. Each has
his moments, but we don’t really care about them. The acting is below average although Howard
dominates his screen time (which apparently was expanded by the producer who
felt Ferrer was hogging the camera).
There is no scene chewing, thankfully.
More distressingly, there is little action and what there is is poorly
staged. And don’t accuse me of being a
hypocrite – if you are going to jazz up the historical fiction, make it entertaining! I feel a documentary would be more
entertaining.
Speaking of entertainment, one
reason Ferrer was incensed with the rewrite was because humor was forced into the
film. That humor is blatantly low brow
which may have gone over well with British audiences in 1955, but is definitely
dated now. There is also a sing-along
that is barf-worthy. The movie is ridden
with clichés. You even get the
redemption arc with Thompson getting to overcome his career-stunting false
accusation of cowardice in WWI. The
interservice pub brawl (which is a bit rare for a British movie) is another example. Another trope is the defiant captives (who
scrawl “Rule Brittania!” and “Drop dead!” on their questionnaires). At least the command clash does have a welcome twist to it.
Christmas stocking stuffer? I know I’m going to get lumps of coal from all
its fans, but this movie is not very good.
Hey, I like “The Secret Invasion” so I get the guilty pleasure vibe. This movie just did not float my cockle.
Grade = C-
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThanks. Good stuff. I will try to watch the documentary soon.
ReplyDeletecan you help me? In the '70's or 80's I remember seeing a Vietnam era movie. A unit is pinned down and at the last minute a guy in a Huey with rock and roll music blaring through a speaker comes over the hill to the rescue. What is the name of this movie? Thanks, C.K. kim@manifestwest.com
ReplyDeletecan you help me? In the '70's or 80's I remember seeing a Vietnam era movie. A unit is pinned down and at the last minute a guy in a Huey with rock and roll music blaring through a speaker comes over the hill to the rescue. What is the name of this movie? Thanks, C.K. kim@manifestwest.com
ReplyDeleteCould be "How Sleep the Brave" (a British film; American title: "Combat Zone"). Released in 1981. I've never seen it and know little about it. Sounds interesting. If that's not it, try to give me more information.
ReplyDeleteI have given this movie a watch and I agree with your thoughts on the movie. The humour put me off to the point it didn't feel like a serious war movie to me. The characters were forgettable and two-dimensional. I even was in disbelief at one point when the ship blowing up was clearly a model that you could see the figures on it.
ReplyDeleteThe ending even put me off on how the only two survivors walk away smugly, callously forgetting their comrades who were killed/captured, and its ends with their ghosts (?) or imaginations walking side by side with them.
The Great Escape might have been fictional, but at least the characters in that one were memorable and easy to get attached to, and it got people to look at the real events. This one tried something similar but failed.
Such a disappointment.
Partway through this movie I said to myself, "oh, this is basically The Dirty Dozen, but because it was made in the 1950s things are more restrained.
ReplyDeleteThen I reached the point where one of the veterans goes AWOL so that he can enter a house and beat the man who is having an affair with his estranged wife while said wife looks on, screaming, and I realized that The Dirty Dozen is actually the toned down version.