Wednesday, September 3, 2025

The Book Thief (2013)


            “The Book Thief” is based on the critically acclaimed best-seller by Marcus Zusak. The movie was directed by Brian Percival. The original score was by John Williams. He was nominated for a Oscar, a Golden Globe, and a BAFTA. He won a Grammy for Best Instrumental Album. The movie was a big hit. 

            Liesel (Sophie Nelisse) is a young German girl who is being raised by the Hubermanns. Rosa (Emily Watson) is an ass, but Hans (Geoffrey Rush) is doting. Liesel loves reading ever since she acquired The Gravedigger’s Handbook. She and her best friend Rudy are typical elementary school students in Nazi Germany. They are in the Hitler Youth, but participation in a book burning causes her to rethink her patriotism. She finds a kindred spirit in the Burgomeister’s wife. She invites Liesel to borrow books from her husband’s library. Hence the title. When the Hubermanns hide a Jewish boy named Max, she teaches him to read. The war has a deep impact on main characters lives. Have some tissues handy.

            “The Book Thief” is a war movie, but not really a Holocaust movie. The only Jewish character is Max. Liesel is a very appealing young lady and her love of reading hopefully inspires more young girls and boys to read more. I haven’t read the book, but my research indicates it has the expected changes when you adapt a young adult book to the screen. Characters were dropped and obviously scenes were eliminated for time reasons. Subplots were cut. (The book is 550 pages.) In a slap in the face of youngsters who have read the book, the movie is more upbeat. The Devil from the book only appears as a narrator at the front and back of the movie, with a little in between. The relationship between Liesel and Rudy is more of a romance than a big brother – little sister vibe. I did feel upon watching the movie that it did not have enough hardship. It piles all the heart-tugging to the end. There is little suspense along the way. The plot clearly aimed the movie at young adult movie-goers, rather than young adult readers. But it did well, so you can’t fault the studio for encouraging the changes.

            I found the movie to be entertaining, but inconsequential. Considering the fame of the novel, I did not find the movie to be impactful. I have a strong belief that a movie version of a book should be better than the book, unless the book is too fanciful or futuristic for movie technology to replicate. The screenwriter of “The Book Thief” had the template of a beloved book to build his screenplay from. He could have improved upon it, but he didn’t. However, if you are not going to read the book or your child is not going to read it, watching the movie is an acceptable option. The plot is close enough and the actors do a great job bringing the characters to life. I believe most readers found the actors to fit how they envisioned the characters they read. And the book does not have a soundtrack by John Williams, so score one for the movie.

 GRADE  =  C



Thursday, August 28, 2025

MACARONI COMBAT #8 - Apocalypse Mercenaries (1987)

              

               I’ll give this much to macaroni combat movies, they usually don’t try to fool you with their titles.  This movie is a good examples of how this subgenre wears its low quality on its sleeve.  I suppose some people might mistake this title for a movie related to “Apocalypse Now”, but those people should be parted from their money.  I mean the $1 they spend at the discount bin at Walmart.

               If you catch this masterpiece while channel surfing after midnight, you won’t need to know the title.  There will be plenty of clues that you have run into a very low budget war movie.  First clue, there is an explosion in the first 40 seconds.  Clue #2 -  the head of the commandos has a really macho name – in this case, Halo.  Clue #3 -  the mission is one behind enemy lines -  in this case, they are going to eliminate Nazi headquarters in Yugoslavia.  Clue #4 – they hook up with a sexy partisan.  Clue #5 -  they blow a lot of shit up -  in this case, a train and an airfield.  Clue #6 -  they shoot from the hip, never reload, never miss.  Clue #7 -  the deaths are silly with the victims throwing their arms into the air.  Wait, you can see this in big budget war movies, too.

               I’ll try not to spoil the plot for you.  You’re welcome.  Halo and a four-man team are sent to wipe out a Nazi headquarters.  His four men include a flier, a doctor, a demolitions nut, and a Rambo-type.  They meet the female partisan who acts as their guide.  When Halo looks through his binoculars, he sees footage from another film.  This is the first of the unintentional laughs.  They take a side mission to destroy a train.  And then an airfield.  They get attacked by Nazi fighters (planes that look nothing like German WWII warplanes) that actually carry bombs that they drop.  Take that, much better films.  There are lots of bombs.  They use poison gas on the headquarters.  That’s at least different.  This all builds to the climactic battle that includes a dogfight and a giant melee on the ground. 

               “Apocalypse Mercenaries” could have been much worse.  It does have a lot of mindless action and the acting is not terrible.  The characters are all cliches, but you don’t expect originality in a macaroni combat movie.  The female partisan is actually not part of the problem.  It’s the males that are bargain basement action heroes.  Everything you expect, you will get.  It’s classic macaroni.  I counted 14 explosions (besides the bombs) and 10 laughs, none of them intentional.  All set to an aggravating score that manages to combine snare drums with synthesizers.  I suggest you watch it muted.  You do know the sound of an explosion, right?

GRADE  =  D

Saturday, August 16, 2025

Pride of the Marines (1945)

                   Al Schmid was one of the most famous Marine heroes from WWII.  He was blinded defending a machine gun position against a massive Japanese banzai attack on Guadalcanal.  He was a good choice for a biopic to boost morale during the war.  Warner Brothers took up the task.  The book “Al Schmid Marine” by Roger Butterfield was adapted.  The screenplay was nominated for an Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay.  It was directed by Delmer Davis (“Destination Tokyo” and “Task Force”).  It was a box office success.

                   The movie opens with narration by Schmid.  We get a tour of his home town of Philadelphia, including the Liberty Bell and Betsy Ross’ home.  Patriotism!  Early on we get a “gee willikers!”  It’s that kind of movie.  The first part of the movie establishes Schmid as the confirmed bachelor, but quite the ladies’ man.  He lives with a married couple.  Al:  “I live alone and like it.”  Jim:  “You  live alone and look it.”  Oh, 1940’s snap!  May sets up Al with a feisty woman named Ruth (Eleanor Parker).  She thinks he’s a “drip” and they hate-banter, so you know they are cinematicly destined.  After Pearl Harbor, Al enlists because “shooting Japs will be more fun than shooting bears.”  The second part skips the boot camp montage and plunges Schmid into Guadalcanal where one Marine says:  “I’m gonna dig this hole so deep it will be just short of desertion.”  Some of the slang we get:  dope, scuttlebutt, chow, smokes. The Japanese are called “nips” or “shambos”.  On the fateful night of the Battle of Tenaru, Schmid and two mates are in a fox hole with a M1917 Browning machine gun.  The night starts with “Maline, tonite you die!”  Response:  “Eat dirt, Tojo!”  Or if you want to be more specific:  “I’ll give you blood poisoning, you ring-tails!”  Unfortunately, one of those ring-tails throws a grenade that blinds Al.  The third part has Schmid dealing with his blinding and determined to avoid Ruth.  “Dear Ruth, I’m not coming back.  Good luck”. 

                   “Pride of the Marines” is slightly better than your typical WWII biopic.  The acting is fine from a good cast.  Garfield was a pretty big star back then.  He befriended the Schmids so he took the role seriously.  He really did not have the range for the role, but he’s appealing.  The dialogue has some good cracks in it, but it is fairly standard.  It keeps the patriotism down, except for one cringe-worthy scene among disabled veterans in the hospital which concludes with a terribly schmaltzy speech.  There is a clear theme of accepting wounded veterans back into society.  Give them a job!  Although a war movie, there is only one brief combat scene.  It is done on a sound stage, so don’t expect much.  It is pretty accurate in covering his Navy Cross-worthy effort.  The Japanese attack involved 800 men.  Schmid was wounded several times, but continued to fire for four hours, even after he was blinded.  200 bodies were found in front of their position.  He did go through a rough rehabilitation period, but I could not find out if the melodramatic romantic developments occurred.  I would assume Hollywood had some say on how his relationship with Ruth was portrayed.

                   “Pride of the Marines” is very much a product of its time.  Contrast it with more recent disabled veteran movies like “Born on the 4th of July” and “Coming Home”.  In “Pride”, the hospital is almost like a frat house.  We’ve come a long way in handling the subject realistically.  But we have also become more cynical in handling our heroes.  Schmid deserved a movie and it does him justice, even though it is simplistic and overly patriotic.

GRADE  =  C

Monday, August 4, 2025

15th Anniversary Post: That Hamilton Woman (1941)

 Today is the 15th anniversary of the start of this blog. Over 700 reviews later, I am still going strong. If you had told me that after 15 years I still would have hundreds of war movies to watch and review, I would tell you that surely there are not that many war movies. I did manage to complete my reviews of Military History magazine's 100 Greatest War Movies a few years ago. And recently I completed my own 100 Best War Movies, but I am not stopping. I chose this movie for the 15th anniversary because "That Hamilton Woman" is a war movie about actual people who it attempts to tell the story of. Naturally, it can not be expected to be perfectly accurate, so the fun is to find out how accurate it is. I have an interest in the Napoleonic Wars and Horatio Nelson, so it makes sense to post this review now.  

                   “That Hamilton Woman” (“Lady Hamilton” in Great Britain) was one of the films made to encourage American support for Britain during its darkest days of WWII.  The treatment was suggested to director/producer Alexander Korda by Winston Churchill and supposedly became his favorite movie.  He once claimed to have seen it 83 times!  Churchill, a fan of Horatio Nelson, wanted a movie made about him and his famous romance with Emma Hamilton.  It was a tale all Englishmen were familiar with, but it would have been revelatory for American audiences.  Korda had the brilliant idea of casting the current Hollywood celebrity couple – the newly wed Laurence Olivier and Vivien Leigh.  It didn’t hurt marketing that their romance had some parallels to those of the movie’s characters.  The actors had fallen in love and conducted a public affair while still married.  It was their third movie together.  They had begun their affair during the filming of “Fire Over England” (1937).    The movie was scripted by Walter Reisch (“Ninotchka”) and R.C. Sheriff (“Journey’s End”).  They had the ulterior motive of slyly tying the tale to Britain’s current situation.  They succeeded in drawing the attention of the America First Committee, which encouraged a boycott of it and similar films (“The Great Dictator”, “Foreign Correspondent”, “The Mortal Storm”).  And Korda drew the attention of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee because of accusations he facilitated MI-5 agents in their ferreting out German activities and infiltration of isolationist groups in America.  Fortunately for Korda, his appearance before the committee was aborted by the attack on Pearl Harbor.  The movie was well-received by critics and audiences.  It was nominated for four Academy Awards -  Sound, Art Direction (Alexander’s brother Vincent, who did a wonderful job on a small budget), Cinematography, and Effects.  It won for Best Sound.

                   The movie opens in Calais where an alcoholic prostitute is arrested and thrown in jail.  She shocks her cell mates by revealing that she used to be the famous Lady Hamilton (Leigh).  Her tale results in a flashback to her better days.  When she was 18 and significantly more beautiful than her current jailed self, she arrived in Naples at he home of Sir William Hamilton (Alan Mowbray).  Although engaged to his nephew, Hamilton has paid off his nephew’s debts and “acquired” Emma.  She is offended at first, but what’s a stripper to do but make the best of it.  And the best of it is a lavish lifestyle with a husband who only requires she grace his arm.  He Eliza Doolittles her and soon she is running his Tara.  Two years later, in walks the dashing, but officious, Capt. Horatio Nelson (Olivier).  There is a spark there and when she intervenes with the rulers of Naples to support the British, Nelson is impressed.  At this point, the movie becomes a chronicle of Nelson’s career and the evolution of their romance.  Nelson’s greatest hits are simply alluded to.  If you are British, you can fill in the blanks.  If you are American, read up on it.  The romance progresses to the point where Sir William snarkily acknowledges it and Horatio has some very awkward moments with his wife.  But love will prevail and they manage to weather the storms.  While sailing by Nelson’s successes at the Nile and Copenhagen, the movie goes all in for the climactic Battle of Trafalgar.  And then it’s back to the Calais jail cell for the what-ifs.

                   “That Hamilton Woman” takes its title from the reaction of British crowds upon seeing the couple in public in London.  The original title of the film was to be “The Enchantress”, which might have been more accurate about Emma, but a 1941 movie could not have lived up to that title.  The Production Code was at its height of ludicrousness, so this famous love affair had to be depicted as chaste.  Olivier and Leigh could not be shown in bed together and not even slightly disrobed.  How Emma became pregnant with Nelson’s son is left to the imagination.  The passion had to come through the actor’s interaction and this is partially successful.  Olivier portrays Nelson as upright, but susceptible to a comely ankle.  Leigh has more fun with the flirtatious Emma.  There is some chemistry from the real-life couple, but the main appeal of the movie to viewers would have been seeing them act together.  Leigh is gorgeous, as is to be expected.  You don’t get the green eyes because the movie is black and white, but she still has the wow factor.  This despite the low budget which resulted in make-up only on the side of the face the camera was on.  She was the perfect choice to play a woman who was painted by George Romney.  Thankfully, the movie spares us from an accurate depiction of her portly later years.  (Leigh in a fat suit would not have been good for box office.) 

                   “That Hamilton Woman” is not a war movie until it gets to Trafalgar.  This sequence almost makes the movie worth the wait for war movie buffs (who tend to not be romance buffs).  It does a good job depicting the battle and includes the memorable moments like the signal “England expects everyone to do their duty” and Nelson’s refusal to dress less like a peacock begging to be shot.  There is plenty of action and cannonading by the models, but it is hard to follow who is who and the movie made the poor decision not to depict the “Nelson touch” by having Olivier explain his plan to his officers.  In fact, the movie makes no case for Nelson as a great leader.  (And frankly, it is not clear that he was a great lover either.)  Nelson’s death is spot on and surprisingly uses the accurate “Kiss me, Hardy” last words (instead of “Kismet, Hardy” which ended up in British textbooks).  I wonder how they got that past the censor.

                   As a war movie, “That Hamilton Woman” comes up short.  It reminds of “Gone with the Wind” in that it is more of a romance set in a war.  It gets credit for being based on a true story that deserved Hollywood treatment.  Even though it had a hidden agenda, it is not overly patriotic and I doubt viewers left the theater and immediately wrote a check to Great Britain.  I bet most simply enjoyed it for its entertainment value, which was high for the time, but seems tame today.  A miniseries on Nelson is definitely needed today.  Why has this not happened, BBC?

GRADE  =  C

HISTORICAL ACCURACY:  The movie is surprisingly accurate for a historical romance.  Emma was born poor and early in her life had to fend for herself.  She was blessed by striking beauty which meant her career path was obvious, especially for an ill-educated woman.  As early as age 15 she was a concubine for a wealthy gentleman.  She would dance nude on tables at his bacchanalian parties.  She eventually settled with George Greville.  He farmed her out to the artist George Romney, who became obsessed with her.  He did a lot of paintings of her and made her a celebrity.  Greville decided he needed to sleep with someone who was wealthy, so when he got engaged to an heiress and she was not into open marriages, he shuffled her off to Naples to entrance his uncle.  She did arrive with her mother.  Hamilton was 55 and newly widowed.  She was the best present he ever received.  He was an art collector and she was living art.   She was less excited, but once she realized her “vacation” on Naples was meant to be permanent, she decided to make the best of it.  Sir William was kind and doting and they fell in love.  When they married, he was 60 and she was 26.  She was quite the hostess and soon was best friends with Queen Maria Carolina (sister of Marie Antoinette).  Her fame swept Europe when she came up with her performance art called “Attitudes”.  She would dress up and portray famous statues and paintings.  Nelson had been married six years when they first met.  He was infatuated from the start.  They corresponded and the love grew.  When he returned five years later, crippled lacking some of his dash, she still fainted in his arms and the romance was on.  As the movie shows, they were often apart for long stretches, but they eventually returned to England together (with her mother and her husband). Nelson’s wife Fanny was not thrilled, especially since Emma was pregnant. Nelson treated her badly, which of course the movie does not show because Nelson was such a hero. The public excused Nelson for the very public affair. Nelson, Emma, William, and her mother openly lived together. When Nelson left to fight the Battle of Trafalgar, Emma did not cope well. She overdrank and overate and went deeply into debt. She escaped her debtors by escaping to France. Her downward spiral continued as she accumulated debts there too and was an alcoholic and a user of laudanum. I found no evidence that she died in debtor’s prison. She was 49 when she died.