“Joe
Maddison’s War” is a BBC movie that is about an average Joe on the home front
in WWII Britain.It starts during the
Battle of Britain and tracks Maddison’s (Kevin Whately) through his soap opera
life impacted a little by the war.
Maddison
is a veteran of WWI, but as his son tells him:“This is my generation’s war.”He
works in a shipyard and brings his lunch in a paper box on a string.He’s a sad sack.His is wife leaves him.Who wouldn’t?After the first bombing raid, he and his friend Harry (Robson Green)
join the Home Guard.Harry is a cynical
wisecracker.When Joe meets a comely
lass named Selina, he will eventually have to make a choice between her and his
wife who returns with a daughter.This
decision will take a few years as the movie draws it out for no particular
reason.Meanwhile, Joe and Harry become
anti-aircraft gunners with no training.They don’t need it as they shoot down the first bomber they aim at!Harry gets in some trouble with a snooty
officer, but at least something finally happens.Unfortunately, there isn’t a whole lot else
that happens in this languid movie.
I
would best describe this movie as inconsequential.It has a good cast and they do their best,
but there is only a bone to gnaw on.There is no meat to the story.It
is a series of boring vignettes.I will
give it credit for being unpredictable, but that’s because I would not have
predicted that over a four year period in the war, basically nothing of
cinematic interest would happen. By the
way, don’t watch it if you are a Catholic.Maddison lost his religion in WWI.He goes against his local priest’s admonition to save his marriage.When his wife leaves, he takes down her
crucifix.
Ernest Hemingway’s novel came out in
1940 and it was movie-bound from the moment it became a bestseller. It was the story of an American who joined
the anti-fascists in the Spanish Civil War.
Paramount bought the rights and Dudley Nichols wrote the
screenplay. He took out any references
to Francisco Franco and the Falangists. I
guess he didn’t want to offend fascists. Sam Wood (“Command Decision”) directed. Hemingway wanted Gary Cooper and Ingrid
Bergman to play his two main characters.
The studio agreed to Cooper, but chose Vera Zorina for the role of
Maria. She had her hair cut short and
she was dressed in drab clothing. Like
the character in the book. When the
executives saw some footage of her, they were appalled that her guerrilla
warrior was not glamorous! They brought
in Bergman and beautified the character.
Bergman’s participation in the picture had a significant unintended
consequence. She had just made
“Casablanca”. Warner Brothers wanted to
reshoot some scenes. One of them
involved replacing “As Time Goes By” with a different song. She was not available, so the film stayed the
way it was. “For Whom the Bell Tolls”
was the second highest grossing film in 1943.
It was critically acclaimed and was nominated for nine Academy
Awards. Katina Paxinou won for Best
Supporting Actress. The other
nominations were for Best Picture (losing to “Casablanca”), Best Actor (Cooper
lost to Paul Lukas for “Watch on the Rhine”), Best Actress (Bergman lost to
Jennifer Jones for “The Song of Bernadette”), Best Supporting Actor (Akim
Tamiroff), Cinematography (Color), Art Direction (Color), Editing, and
Score.
The movie opens with a title card:
“Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind and therefore send
not to know ‘For whom the bell tolls, the bell tolls for thee.’” (The quote actually comes from a book by John
Donne.) We are in Spain in 1937. Robert Jordan (Cooper) is an American
language teacher who has joined the Republicans fighting against Franco’s
fascists. He is an explosives expert and
we see him sabotaging a train. He gets
away, but he has to shoot his wounded partner.
His next mission is to blow up a bridge.
He hooks up with a band of rebels led by Pablo. Their lair is a cave in the mountains. Pablo is against blowing up the bridge
because he fears reprisals and the heat that his band will receive. His wife Pilar (Paxinou) is one tough
broad. She overrules Pablo, calls him a
coward and drunkard, and green lights the mission. On the other end of the female spectrum is
the lovely Maria. She was rescued from
the fascists. She and Jordan fall in
love. There are going to be a lot of
bumps in the road, but I don’t have to spoiler alert that there is going to be
a blown up bridge.
“For Whom the Bell Tolls” is a
decent rendering of the famous novel. It
is faithful to the book, so students can write their book report from it
instead of reading the book. Or use AI. And
it is in Technicolor, not black and white!
And did I mention it has explosions?
The movie hooks you early with the blowing up of a train and this is
bookended by the railroad bridge demolition.
There’s also a bullet-expending ambush and a chase scene at the
end. For guys, these will balance the
schmaltzy romance that is intertwined with the action scenes.
The movie has a fine ensemble cast
and the acting is stellar, with the surprising exception of Ingrid
Bergman. She is not believable as
Maria. Maria has seen her parents killed
and has been raped by the fascists. And
yet, she is a cheerful person. She’s
just not believable. Plus, she is much
too beautiful to play a guerrilla gal.
Her love scenes with Cooper are rife with smarmy dialogue. In one scene,
Jordan and Maria go to sleep after talking in gag-inducing frippery and when
they wake up we have to sit through more of it.
Other than the smoochy stuff, the dialogue is fine. The characters are
interesting. Pablo is a spineless jerk,
but he gets the films redemption arc.
Jordan is Gary Cooper playing himself.
He did not have to stretch much, but he is perfect in the role, as
Hemingway foresaw. Acting honors go to
Oscar-deserving Paxinou. Her Pilar is a
blast (excuse the pun). She not only
should be running the band, she does run the band. She gets a monologue on being ugly. And she gets to pull a grenade with her
teeth. She is the first woman I have
seen in a war movie who could have actually done that.
The movie is technically sound. The lighting for the nighttime scenes is
excellent. Something modern movies have
a hard time pulling off. The score is
traditional drama music and the movie seldom does not have music, but it’s a
good soundtrack and became the first movie soundtrack to be released as a
record.
The film is a bit predictable,
especially if you are familiar with Hemingway’s style. For instance, Jordan decides to blow up the
bridge even though they find out that the purpose for the demolition is no
longer in play. The film eschews a happy ending in favor of an appropriate
finale for the Hemingway hero Jordan.
Maybe that is why it lost to “Casablanca”. Jordan does not walk into the misty night
with Pilar.
If you don’t like classic movies directed by William Wellman
and starring Gary Cooper, Ray Milland, and Robert Preston, you might want to
check out a remake from 1966.That was
the year some brainiac decided that the Beau Geste (1939) version could be
improved upon with a second rate cast, a one-time movie director, and less from
the famous novel.Before you say “at
least it’s in color”, the 1939 was in color, too.So, if there wasn’t a change in color, what
was “improved”?The brothers Geste are
Americans.There are no scenes from when
they were children.There are no pesky
female characters yammering away.(No
female speaks in this movie.)And the
villain’s name was changed just to confuse people.And one brother was deleted because who needs
a guy named Digby?
The
movie opens in 1906 in the Sahara desert.A unit of French Legionnaires arrives at a fort that is on fire.Beau Geste (Guy Stockwell) is the only
survivor.Flashback to Beau and John
(Doug McClure) enlisting in the French Foreign Legion after Beau fled from
home, taking the blame for an act of embezzlement.They are put under the charge of the
dastardly Sgt. Dagineau (Telly Savalas).He oversees the requisite training montage that includes marching
blind-folded toward a cliff to instill blind obedience.As if he were not a martinet already,
Dagineau receives an anonymous letter threatening him with death.He focuses his suspicions on Beau.With the help of a toady named Boldini (David
Mauro), he makes life rough for Beau and the rest of the unit.Things get worse when they are sent to
relieve the garrison at the isolated Fort Zinderneuf.On the way, they are ambushed by the native
Tauregs and Dagineau takes command when they reach the fort.A mutiny against his tyrannic rule is
interrupted by a besieging Taureg army.
My
advice would be to only watch this movie if you have not read the novel and
seen the 1939 movie.If you have seen
the movie, you will spend the whole time wondering why the Hell the
screenwriter made such ridiculous changes in the plot.None of the changes are for the better.And none of them make sense for box office
reasons. Other than the nationalistic changing of Beau and John to Americans.I’m sure that brought in thousands of
Americans who refused to see the original because it was too British.Unfortunately, this was probably balanced by
all the female moviegoers lost by the elimination of women from the film.Producer Walter Seltzer was attracted to the
escapism, adventure, and romance of the earlier version and then he allowed his
movie to dilute all those elements.Another element that made the 1939 version wonderful was the
incorporation of a mystery involving the stolen gem.To drop that element was a very questionable
decision for a low budget movie lacking star power.Speaking of star power, the only reason for
doing a remake would have been to see the modern equivalents of Cooper,
MIlland, and Preston reenacting the plot.
The
best word for the movie is mediocre.The
cast is that of a made-for-TV movie.Stockwell is bland as the supposed to be dashing Beau and McClure is too
sincere as John.The casting of Savalas
for the Brian Donlevy role was a good one.He is effective as the villain and is the only actor who comes out of
this with his head held high.The action
scenes were meant to be the showstoppers, but they are those of a B
western.The Tauregs had just as soon
have been Indians attacking a fort.As
usual in a movie of this type (and most B war movies), no enemy is ever
wounded.If shot, they are dead. Until
one is just wounded at the end for plot purposes.
Just
watch the earlier one again.
GRADE=C-
Beau Geste TV series (1982)
In
1982, another stab at the P.C. Wren novel was made.This time by the BBC.It was divided into eight 30-minute
episodes.It was directed by Douglas
Camfield, who did a lot of the “Doctor Who” episodes.It was filmed in England, including the
desert scenes.As is usual for BBC
productions, it follows the source material closely.Much more closely than any other version.It is the best option if you do not want to
read the novel.That does not mean it is
the best option for entertainment.Fidelity is not always the best approach for screenwriters.The novel is a classic, but the 1939 movie
made changes for the better.In this
case, it was wisely decided to not try to replicate that movie.This was wise given the cast available.Think opposite of Gary Cooper, Ray Milland,
Robert Preston, and Brian Donlevy.Add a
low budget.
“The
Last Legion” is a Dino De Laurentis production. For those of my generation,
that used to mean the film was likely a bloated all-star epic, like “Battle of
the Bulge” and “Anzio”.It was one of
the last movies that he produced. The film was directed by Doug Lefler, who
only had a few television episodes to his credit. It was based on the novel by
Valerio Manfredi who helped co-write the screenplay. The story combines two
legends because two is better than one, right?Those legends are the legend of King Arthur, specifically the sword in
the stone, and Rome’s Lost Legion.
A narrator tells us the movie is set
in the waning days of the Roman Empire. A sword made for Julius Caesar had been
passed down from emperor to emperor until Tiberius had it hidden upon his
death. The sword has magical powers and Rome could sure use them as it is being
threatened by barbarians led by Odoacer (Peter Mullan). Rome is pulling back
its legions, including the ones in Britain. A Roman general named Aurelius
(Colin Firth) has returned to guard the emperor, a boy named Romulus Augustulus
(Thomas Brodie-Sangster). When the Goths capture Rome, Romulus is taken
captive, but Aurelius escapes. Ambrosinus (Ben Kingsley) is a Merlin-like
(actually closer to Obi Wan) advisor who convinces Odoacer to exile Romulus
rather than kill him. The suddenly sympathetic barbarian agrees. Aurelius and
Mira (Aishwarya Rai) rescue Romulus, who has discovered the sword hidden in
Tiberius’ villa. He who finds it is destined to rule (or in this case rerule).
The motley crew go on an odyssey that leads to Britain where they hook up with
the Lost Legion. The legionaries had stayed in Britain and are now farmers.
They will come out of retirement as Romulus is being chased by Goths and they
hook up with an evil Britannic chieftain. Let the clanging continue!
How could such a good cast make such
a bad movie? Clearly, the problem was in the script. By trying to combine two
totally unrelated legends, we get a mish-mash that is mostly mush. Trying to
jam the Arthur legend into the fall of the Roman Empire requires too much
reality suspension. And, in spite of the unique attempt to combine the legends,
the movie still ends up predictable. Everything that happens has been done in
other medieval movies. The villains are mustache-twirlers. The heroes are
saintly. Their dialogue is trite and embarrassing for thespians like Firth and
Kingsley. I wonder if they were told beforehand that the movie was going to
premiere in Abu Dhabi. That should have caused some second-thoughts about
signing on, but then again, they have nobody to blame but themselves since they
had access to the script. Maybe they were in it for the free trip to Abu Dhabi.
Typical of a De Laurentis
production, the action scenes are second-rate. The CGI is terrible. The
soundtrack is Disneyesque. The action scenes look like they are copying a Bruce
Lee movie. The combat keeps trying to top itself with more and more ahistorical
weapons. For example, we are treated to a multi-arrow launcher. The
choreography is brainless and derivative. On the plus side, the 9th
Legion “rides to the rescue” in a testudo.
“The Last Legion” was the first of
three movies that featured Roman legionaries in Britain. The others were
“Centurion” in 2010 and “The Eagle” in 2011. I am a big fan of Roman history,
in particular the Roman army. It is always nice to see movies on that subject,
but we have not been too blessed with these movies. “Centurion” is a B movie
and “The Eagle” is a C. Both are entertaining, if disappointing. “The Last
Legion” is just an embarrassment.