Thursday, March 30, 2017
Picture, Quote, Movie #7
“Mandrake, do you recall what Clemenceau once said about war? … He said war was too important to be left to the generals. When he said that, 50 years ago, he might have been right. But today, war is too important to be left to politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought. I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.”
WHAT MOVIE? This movie has one of the wettest scenes in war movie history as our commando team comes ashore in fourteen minutes of storm effects with no dialogue.
Monday, March 27, 2017
OVERLOOKED GEM? Jarhead 3: The Siege (2016)
Once upon a time there was a movie about a sniper in
Operation Desert Storm. It was based on
a best seller memoir entitled “Jarhead”.
The book and movie were noteworthy for depicting the boredom of modern
warfare. Anthony Swofford did not fire a
single shot in the war. Although totally
realistic, the sequels have taken care of that deficiency. No one wants to see a straight to DVD sniper
movie with little sniping. The two
sequels don’t save ammunition. “Jarhead
3: The Siege” keeps the Jarhead name,
but that is it. It was directed by
William Kaufman with a nod towards Hitchcock.
In that they are both directors.
Corporal
Albright (Charlie Weber) arrives at the U.S. embassy in “the Kingdom”. It’s a quiet zone, but don’t turn off the
movie yet. Albright is introduced to his
new mates and the sexy digital security director Olivia (Sasha Jackson). He also meets the peacemonger Ambassador
Cahill (Stephen Hogan). Albright does
not make a good impression when he goes cowboy on a training mission. He gets a moderate ass-chewing and then a
harsher one when he goes over his gunny’s head about a suspected
terrorist. No one believes him until the
embassy comes under extreme attack. The
terrorists are led by a Bin Laden type named Khaled. He is the leader apparently because while
every one of his men is easy to kill, he is very difficult to kill. He is a mastermind which is proven by the
ease with which his men get into the embassy.
Cahill takes refuge in a safe room, but Cahill and the others go out to
rip asses. And there is plenty of ass-ripping. First there is the initial assault, then local government forces arrive as cannon
fodder, then a technical arrives with more jihadis because the movie is running
out of bad guys to kill. (The director
probably sent a truck to the market place to hire more extras midway through
the filming.) When the movie gets tired
of the last stand, it morphs into a chase film, returns to a last stand, and
concludes with the arrival of the cavalry.
Now that I think about it, this movie is a lot like a Western.
If
you have a craving for dead hajjis, this is the movie for you. Once the assault commences, there are only a
few expository breath-catchers.
Otherwise it is nonstop mayhem.
The violence is generic. The good
guys never miss and the ratio of dead to wounded is typical of combat
porn. At least, some of the deaths are
unpredictable. There is not enough
reloading, but there is some. The acting is fine, even though Weber is wooden. His rogue cowboy grows into leadership in the
crucible of combat. Yawn. The other characters are a mix of stereotypes
and relatively originals. Cahill is not
the usual sniffling bureaucrat. Olivia
turns out to be a warrior. If she had
been wearing a bikini during the chase scene, the movie probably would not have
gone straight to DVD. While Khaled is a
stock character, he does get to present his side of the argument. He is shut up by the end of the movie,
however.
GRADE
= C+
Saturday, March 25, 2017
Picture, Quote, Movie #6
“Now I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.”
MOVIE? The biggest star in this star-studded movie has a memorable scene where he stress-repeats the "Hail Mary".
Sunday, March 19, 2017
CRACKER? The Siege of Jadotville (2016)
“The
Siege of Jadotville” is the true story of a forcibly forgotten incident in the
Congo Crisis of the 1960s. It brings to
light the last stand of an Irish UN peace-keeping unit. It was directed by Richie Smyth based on the
nonfiction book The Siege of Jadotville:
The Irish Army’s Forgotten Battle (2005). The actor’s went through a boot camp, which
given that this is the Irish Army, was probably as intense as Boy Scout
Camp. Sorry about that one, but the
incident was the first time a unit of the Irish Army was deployed
overseas. One of the actors was the
grandson of the Irish commander. How is
that for having a technical adviser on set?
The
movie opens with a title card that tells the non-professional historians in the
audience that the situation in the Congo in 1961 was part of the Cold War
conflict between the U.S. and Soviet Union.
Rather than spend the first thirty minutes of the movie explaining what
was happening, it summarizes by saying that there was a struggle for control
over the mineral-rich Katanga province.
Company A, 35th Battalion is being sent to keep the
peace. There is a pre-deployment scene in
a pub to remind the non-humans in the audience that Irish like to drink. The men are all green (and they are
unseasoned) and are led by a military history buff Commandant Pat Quinlan (Jamie
Dornan). He gives a speech about how
they will make Ireland proud. By keeping
the peace? Low bar.
When
the unit arrives at Jadotville, since they are all Irish, no one mentions how
similar the situation is to the movie “Zulu”.
Intercutting to the cinematic slimy politicians informs us that besides
being sitting ducks that are ill-supplied, this will not be Boy Scout
camp. The local UN official Connor
O’Brien (Mark Strong) implements Operation Morthor which is to get tough in
Katanga. This will be a tall order
because Company A is not only poorly armed, but the local civilians do not want
their protection and the mining company wants them out. When the UN uses other forces to crack down
on the Katangese government, O’Brien does not bother to tell Quinan that he has
thrown a rock at a bee hive. The bees
are local warriors (doing their Zulu impressions) and French Foreign Legion
badasses led by Rene Faulques (Guillaume Canet). There is also a Simon Legree of a mine owner
pulling the strings. The strings involve
sending swarms of cannon fodder across open ground with predictable
results. This being a war movie, each
assault bumps up the last. The French
wait until the second attack to break out the mortars and the third to call in
their air support. These attacks require
a cinematic load of ammo expenditure which is a problem since they were already
low on ammunition. And whiskey.
“The
Siege of Jadotville” gets a lot of good will from me because it sheds a light
on a sadly forgotten heroic action. It
needs the bonus points for historical accuracy and significance because it is
otherwise an average war movie. Most of
it is average. The acting. The
dialogue. There is little character
development and it relies mostly on stock characters like the stoical
commander, the slimy politician, the cocky enemy commander, the
mustache-twirling mine tycoon. The men
of the unit are interchangeable and nameless.
Contrast this with “Zulu” and you can see more copying would have been
better in this respect. There are lame attempts at banter and soldier
life. It does a fair job of intercutting
between the boots on the ground and the politicians using them as toy soldiers.
The
movie has plenty of action, but it is not combat porn. There are four separate combat scenes and
they are competently done. All of the
attacks are frontal, so there is little variety other than throwing in the
mortars and the air attack. As I
watched, I remarked at how lucky the Irish were in avoiding casualties. This seemed out of place in a modern war
movie, but I subsequently have found that the lack of Irish blood conforms to
the historical facts. A rare example of
fidelity over volatility.
In
conclusion, I have a soft spot in my heart for movies that bring obscure, but
worthy historical events to the screen.
I especially enjoy war movies that make me ashamed that the event they
cover was not known to me. But the shame
is overcome by the enjoyment of watching a war movie about a historical event
and not knowing the ending. And I look
forward to researching how true to the story the film is. Often what I find is the movie has shined
light on the event, but the script has been less than faithful to the
truth. “The Siege of Jadotville” has
brought recognition to a heroic unit that had been largely forgotten. Not just forgotten, but in some ways maligned
by the few who knew about it. This movie
sets the record straight and sticks to the facts admirably. So admirably that the movie is less
entertaining for the people who do not care about the history. Kudos for that.
GRADE = B-
HISTORICAL ACCURACY: The
Congo Crisis occurred between 1960-1965 after the Republic of Congo got its
independence from Belgium. Part of the
crisis had to do with the secession of a mineral-rich region called Katanga. UN Secretary General Dag Hammerskjold sent in
peace-keepers, but refused to take sides.
Part of the peace-keeping force was Company A, 35th Battalion
led by Commandant (equivalent to Major) Dan Quinlan. The unit was mostly young men and this was
the first time Irish troops had been used in an international affair.
The 155-158 men were stationed at Jadotville and given the job of
protecting the Belgian civilians in the area.
This was ironic because most of the locals sided with the
secessionists. Quinlan took steps to
fortify his vulnerable position by digging trenches. His unit was lightly armed and had only a few
Vickers machine guns and 60 mm. mortars.
The siege was precipitated by UN diplomat Connor O’Brien who greenlighted
a plan called Operation Morthor. The
mission was to take positions in Elisabethville belonging to the Katanga
government. The Katangese leader named
Tshombe was ready for a fight and unleashed a force consisting of Luba
tribesmen and Belgian, French, and Rhodesian mercenaries. Their leader was a French Foreign Legionnaire
named Rene Faulques. The attackers used
81 mm. mortars and a 75 mm. field gun.
The attack started during an open-air Mass. The warning was sounded by a sentry. The Irish held off the attack with withering
fire and dealt with the artillery with accurate counterbattery fire. The siege lasted six days. At one point Quinlan communicated “We will
hold out until our last bullet is spent.
Could do with some whiskey.” (This line is in the movie.) Supplies were not forthcoming.
The one attempt at a helicopter resupply resulted in tainted water. The defense was weakened by strafing and
bombing attacks by a lone fighter jet.
Eventually, the Irish arrived at the point where they could not have
withstood another assault. Quinlan
decided that continuing to battle would be hopeless, so he surrendered his men. Unbelievably, not a single Irish soldier was
killed and only six were wounded. The
besiegers suffered around 300 dead and about 1,000 wounded. They were held as hostages for one month and
then released. They continued their service
and then returned to Ireland at the end of their six month tour. The Irish government played down the siege
with the implication that the surrender had been unjustified. No decorations were awarded to the numerous
men that Quinlan suggested. The unit was
tainted and “Jadotville Jack” became a synonym for cowardice. The guilt weighed heavy over the years and the unit was given the Presidential Unit
Citation in 2016. Production of the
movie may have had something to do with that.
Friday, March 17, 2017
Picture, Quote, Movie Quiz #5
"Are you smoking this sh-t so’s to escape from reality? Me, I don’t need this sh-t, I am reality. There’s the way it ought to be, and there’s the way it is.”
WHAT MOVIE? This movie includes the most famous leaders of the American Indian Movement in its cast. They made this movie eighteen years after their involvement in the occupation of Wounded Knee in 1973.
Sunday, March 12, 2017
WTF? Beyond Valkyrie: Dawn of the 4th Reich (2016)
Each
year I check on what war movies are being planned for the future. Often there are movies that sound interesting
on paper and I look forward to someday seeing them. As I look back over the years, many of those
intriguing titles never made it into production. And some, unfortunately, did. This leads me to wonder two things: 1. Why do good movies not get made? 2. Why
do bad movies get green-lighted? “Beyond
Valkyrie” fits in the second category.
It was directed by Claudio Fah.
Remember that name. He’s going to
be big someday. Or not. The movie went straight-to-video which still
means that it got further than a bunch of the titles I had been looking forward
to. Life is not fair.
The
movie begins with a title card that informs us that Germany is losing the war,
but the Nazis are stockpiling something in East Prussia. In England, “Operation Jedburgh” has the
mission of going behind enemy lines to bring out a German officer who is part
of Operation Valkyrie (the attempt on Hitler’s life). The movie is unclear about why they need this
guy, but don’t worry about it - the script doesn’t. A below average CGI transport plane gets shot
down and our four commandoes are on their own.
They are led by Capt. Blackburn (Sean Patrick Flanery) and include a
crusty sergeant played by Tom Sizemore.
If you continue watching after Sizemore’s involvement in the movie, you
are truly a war movie fan and/or a masochist.
Either way, keep drinking.
Our
quartet hooks up with four Soviets led by Maj. Kulkov (Pasha Lychnikoff). There is a Mexican standoff before the Allies
bond. They are joined by a hot spy
(actress Julie Engelbrecht in case you want to skip the movie and see just this
scene) who gratuitously shows her
breasts to assure us we are watching a straight-to-video movie. The band of brothers are trapped in a house by
Nazis leading to a ridiculous shootout with the usual German mindless
assaulters being mowed down. Think "Where Eagles Dare". Then it’s
on to rescue the good Nazi while being chased by the evil Nazi. It all gets a bit redundant with prodigious expenditure
of ammo. The German soldiers are worse
shots than Imperial Stormtroopers.
“Beyond
Valkyrie” is not the sequel to the Tom Cruise movie that you were hoping
for. And this time they still don’t get
Hitler. What we have here is the classic
straight-to-DVD bait and switch involving a title. Of course, if you are fooled by the title,
you get what you deserve. And that means
terrible effects, terrible acting, terrible dialogue… you get the idea. Or I could have simply said you get Tom
Sizemore.
GRADE
= F
Friday, March 10, 2017
Picture, Quote, Movie Quiz #4
“When I go home people will ask me, ‘Hey Hoot, why do you do it man? What, you some kinda war junkie?’ You know what I’ll say? I won’t say a goddamn word. Why? They won’t understand. They won’t understand why we do it. They won’t understand that it’s about the men next to you, and that’s it. That’s all it is.”
What movie is this? This is the only war movie I am aware of where a soldier carries a head in a bag. For snacking. And he's one of the good guys.
Sunday, March 5, 2017
Picture, Quote, Movie Quiz #3
“Keep the sand out of your weapons, keep those actions clear. I’ll see you on the beach.”
WHAT MOVIE IS THIS? A lot of training on a stable runway to take off of a bobbing runway, all to spend half a minute over an enemy capital.
Friday, March 3, 2017
OVERLOOKED GEM? Dad’s Army (2016)
When I was growing up my favorite TV
show was “Gilligan’s Island”. I am not
proud of that, but I am not defensive about it either. Everyone has guilty pleasures and “Gilligan’s
Island” is one of my generations most common ones. There has been much conjecture over the years
about a remake. Most would agree that
while it is interesting to wonder who would play the iconic roles, the end
product would be nothing short of a disaster.
Think “Flintstones” or virtually any other attempt to bring a TV classic
to the big screen. A recent attempt to
buck the trend was “Dad’s Army”. For my
fellow Baby Boomers, “Dad’s Army” is the equivalent of “Hogan’s Heroes” for the British. It appeared on
the BBC from 1968-1977 and was very popular.
It ranks among the greatest British sitcoms. The series is about the Home Guard in WWII
and most of the characters are elderly British gents who are patriotically defending
their island against a potential invasion or paratrooper drop. The movie takes a typical plot and expands it
into a feature film.
The movie is set in 1944. A Nazi spy is killed sending a message by
pigeon. The pigeon is subsequently shot
down by some British lads who are hunting for Pvt. Walker (Daniel Mays). Mays is the unit’s black marketer. This way of connecting the unit to the spy is
typical of the movie’s humor. The rest
of the characters are introduced via names on the screen which is the movie’s
way of making it easy for its elderly audience to identify the new actors
that are playing their old favorites. To
kill time before the espionage plot kicks in, the geezers are sent on a mission
to recover a runaway bull. 1960s British
slapstick ensues. Meanwhile, the Nazis
have green-lighted Operation Cobra which involves a lady spy infiltrating the
Home Guard to determine the site of the D-Day build-up. Rose Winters (Catherine Zeta-Jones) is
masquerading as a journalist who is doing a story on the unit. Since she is automatically the hottest bird
in Walmington-on-Sea, several members of the group try making moves on
her. This includes Capt. Mainwarring
(Toby Jones) and his second in command Sgt. Wilson (Bill Nighy). She plays them for fools, which is not much
of a challenge. Mainwarring gets to be
lead buffoon. The movie uses the tired
old gag where Rose convinces him that he looks more handsome without his
glasses. Tired pratfalls result.
Naturally, the wives and women of the town feel threatened by the hottie. As should all of Great Britain since this wily
female spy is using these geniuses to find information that will win the war
for Hitler.
I am all for nostalgia. Hell, I’m a History teacher. And I have a soft spot for classic TV. But that is mainly nostalgia-fueled. I am not blind to the reality that the Golden
Age of television is mostly pyrite. I’m
talking about American TV. I am not as
qualified to disrespect the BBC. While a
big fan of its crime and mystery dramas, I am less enamored with the sitcoms, with the obvious exceptions of "Monty Python" and "Fawlty Towers". My favorite is "Allo!
Allo!" which is ironic because it is also set in WWII. David Croft co-created and co-wrote both
“Dad’s Army” and “Allo! Allo!” I have seen every episode of “Allo! Allo!”, but had seen none of “Dad’s Army”
until I watched a couple in preparation for this review. I watched the first episode and one of the
most highly acclaimed episodes (“Deadly Attachment”) to get a feel for the show
and to be able to compare it to the movie.
I have to admit I was not impressed
with the series. In my opinion, it is
greatly inferior to “Allo! Allo!”, but I
understand that humor is subjective and many would argue that “Gilligan’s
Island” is sophomoric and “Hogan’s Heroes” is offensive. Regardless of anyone’s opinion on the quality
of the TV series, the movie could not have made many fans happy. As a stand alone effort, it is terrible. It just is not funny. I did not laugh a single time and I generally
am open to silliness. The slapstick is
lame and the feeble attempts at sexual innuendo (an art that BBC sitcoms have
long mastered) are pathetic. It is not
even campy, which is the least you could ask for in an attempt to revive a
dinosaur comedy. The acting is
embarrassing. I felt sorry for a cast
that was heavy with recognizable British B-listers. It was not their fault, mind you. Toby Jones is given the thankless task of
caricaturing a caricature. In the
series, Mainwarring is portrayed as a well-meaning, if clueless leader
wannabe. In the movie, he becomes a
dolt. I find it hard to believe that the
series’ fans were happy with this tweaking of the character. The rest of the characters are more faithful
to the originals, but second rate. Since
this is a modern remake, the women’s roles had to be enhanced. Mrs. Mainwarring and her cadre are given a
prominent role when in the series she did not even appear. Most perplexing is the appearance of
Catherine Zeta-Jones. I doubt this movie
gets featured on her resume. If the idea
was to attract an American audience – that was not going to happen no matter
who appeared in the movie. Talk about a
movie that does not travel well. Was she
that desperate for cash?
My take away from the viewing
experience was one of sadness and I am not even a fan of the series. I just know that there are many who are and
as an Anglophile I wanted the movie to be good.
It isn’t. But neither will
“Gilligan’s Island”. Some ideas are best
left in the speculation phase. I sure
would like to see a movie based on “Allo!
Allo!” Imagine what they could do
with the sexual innuendo in the 21st Century. I wonder who would play Rene. Actually, I fantasize more about who would
play Yvette.
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Picture, Quote, Movie Quiz #2
“You have to think about one shot. One shot is what it’s all about. A deer’s gotta be taken with one shot.”
What movie is this? The lead in this movie did not have to act too hard because he had served in PT boats. His co-star avoided doing that sort of thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)