You would think that by the time I got to 500 posts there would be no significant war movies left to review. You'd be wrong. I am now at 600 and still have a long "to be watched" list. Fortunately, I still love doing this blog and intend to keep going. Hell, I haven't even started my 100 Best War Movies posts yet. For my 600th post I have chosen two movies that reflect my love of war fiction and my belief that some of the best war movies are made for TV.
DUELING MOVIES: Hornblower:
The Duel (1998) vs. Sharpe’s
Rifles (1993)
VS.
I am very selective in my historical
fiction reading. I like to read series,
but most are too historically inaccurate and don’t have enough action. My two favorites are the Hornblower and
Sharpe series. Both are set in the
Napoleonic Wars. The first is in the
very crowded Napoleonic naval warfare subgenre and the second is in the much
rarer ground warfare subgenre. Both are
written by acclaimed authors – C.S. Forester and Bernard Cornwell. Both are centered around a character who
rises through the ranks. Those of us who
enjoy this type of historical war novels are blessed to have these two series
and doubly blessed to have two outstanding TV series based on them.
“Hornblower: The Duel” (entitled “The Even Chance” in
Great Britain) is the first in a series of movies produced by ITV and
A&E. This movie introduces
Midshipman Horatio Hornblower (Ion Groffudd) as he joins the crew of the HMS Justinian
in 1793. “Welcome to Purgatory”, he is
told as soon as he boards. It will be
closer to Hell for the seventeen year old rich kid. The ship is commanded by an old and worn-out
captain and the midshipmen are dominated by a psychopath named Simpson (Dorian
Healy). He makes it his objective to
make Hornblower’s life as miserable as possible. It gets so bad that Hornblower challenges
Simpson to a duel. However, another
midshipman named Clayton (Duncan Bell) takes Hornblower’s place, so the rivalry
continues. Hornblower gets transferred
to the HMS Indefatigable, which is commanded by the no nonsense Captain Edward
Pellew (Robert Lindsay). He forbids
Hornblower to fight any more duels.
Hornblower is given command of a gun crew. It is motley.
He will have to earn the tars’ respect.
And get on the good side of the captain.
Luckily, he is a quick study and a born leader. The movie is episodic after the
build-up. Hornblower has a time dealing
with a French prize ship. Hornblower
leads a boarding party that cuts out a French warship. Hornblower rescues the Indy from attack by
three corvettes. The movie culminates
with the return match with the dastardly Simpson. Hornblower gets killed and the series ends
with just one episode. Just kidding.
“Sharpe’s Rifles” was produced
by ITV in 1993. I first saw it on PBS here in America. In a move that changed the history of the world,
Sean Bean replaced Paul McGann in the lead role after McGann was injured
playing soccer. It is impossible to
imagine anyone else playing Richard Sharpe.
In fact, Cornwell changed the character in the subsequent books to
reflect Bean’s portrayal. The series
starts in Portugal in the early stages of Wellington’s Peninsula War. Sgt. Sharpe saves Gen. Arthur Wellesley’s
life from some French cavalry and is “rewarded” with a field commission. One theme of the film is how Sharpe’s lower
class background makes him ill-fitted for the officer corps. He will not be welcomed by the snooty upper
class officers. To spark his short temper
even more, Sharpe’s promotion is greeted with skepticism by the enlisted men
because they are conditioned to believe only their betters are capable of
commanding scum like them. Sharpe is
given a special mission to find a banker carrying the army’s payroll and get
him back safely. He is given command of
a small unit of riflemen called the “Chosen Men”. It is a typically heterogeneous war movie
group. He’s going to earn their respect
and he starts by winning a bare knuckle, eye-gouging duel with a big Irishman
named Harper (Darrow O’Malley). Sharpe
may now be an officer, but he fights like a “proper bastard”. Although bitter enemies, they won't stay that way. This is the start of one of the greatest warrior duos in war movie history. On the way to the banker, Sharpe hooks up
with a Spanish guerrilla band led by a noble named Bas Vivar (Simon Andreu) and
a female partisan named Teresa (Assumpta Serna). They are transporting a sacred relic to a
town to inspire the Spanish people to rebel against French rule. Sharpe and Teresa do not get along at first. That will change.
“Hornblower: The Duel” was a big budget production and it
showed. The Indefatigable is actually
the Grand Turk (a replica of the HMS Blandford) which is a 22-gun corvette with
twelve pound guns. It is supposed to
represent a 44-gun frigate with twenty-four pounders. The film is lensed so the action appears to
be on a larger ship. The exteriors and
interiors allow the movie to be nicely instructive on shipboard life. The below deck set is authentic. You can learn a lot about what is was like to
serve on a British warship in the age of fighting sail. The plot manages to hit on midshipmen
training, burial at sea, firing sequence, boarding, women below decks in port,
and of course, dueling. But this is not
a documentary. The story is entertaining
and the characters are intriguing. The
story revolves around two themes. One is
Hornblower’s growth as a leader. The other
is his conflict with Simpson. The first
follows a traditional arc, the second is what sets the movie apart. Simpson is one of the greatest war movie
villains. The final duel closes the
movie with a cherry on top. The casting
director deserved a bonus. The actors
are all perfect in their roles.
Hornblower dominates, but it is truly an ensemble movie. The movie
launched Gruffudd to stardom and just like Bean as Sharpe, it is impossible to
imagine anyone else playing the role.
Healy is not a cartoon villain and he makes his character’s death very
fulfilling. Lindsay’s Pellew ranks among the great cinematic ship captains. And
he gives life to one of the greatest Royal Navy heroes. There is nothing TV about the
production. The dialogue is
excellent. The music fits nicely. The sound effects make you feel you are on
the ship.
“Sharpe’s Rifles” lays the
groundwork for the rest of the series.
Sharpe’s personality is firmly established by Bean and the series’
dynamic of Sharpe’s struggles with the officer system begins. The characters are fleshed out nicely by a
good cast. This includes the fascinating
Teresa. She is a vengeance minded
heroine who mentors Sharpe. The romance
is not Victorian and truly reflects the characters’ inner feelings. Teresa will be a recurring character and
their love is a real strength of the series. As for as the bromance of Sharpe and Harper,
the series opener nails that down. The
plot flows smoothly and the tying in of the two missions is well handled. There is a villain (Harper) in need of
redemption and a villain (Bas Vivar’s collaborator brother) in need of a sword
stabbing. Both of these arcs are
satisfactorily rendered. Considering its
low budget, “Sharpe’s Rifles” does a great job with what it has. The main thing it has is Sean Bean, but
credit must also go to the screenplay which faithfully reproduces Cornwell’s
novel. The dialogue is noteworthy with
plenty of soldier slang. Don’t expect to
hear any salty language or see any graphic violence. This is not an HBO production. Similar to “The Duel”, one can learn some
interesting facts about the British army in this movie. In general, we are enlightened about the
classism in the army. The movie passes
on the historical simplification that all officers were effete snobs and all
the infantry were the scum of the Earth.
Specifically we learn about the wonders of the Baker rifle.
Besides the historical period,
there are some similarities between the two movies. Both have a main character who has to grow
into his job. Hornblower uses his brain,
Sharpe starts using his brawn and gradually learns to relate to the men. They both have a nemesis, but the resolutions
of the conflicts are very different, yet fitting. Both main characters have tough task masters
who are actual historical figures. Both
have to earn the respect of the men who they are put in charge of. In both movies, you can learn a lot about the
British military. There are good battle
scenes in each, although the budget of “Hornblower” allows for more realism and
less of a made-for-TV feel. The violence
is not graphic in either.
Considering the similarities, it
is hard to judge the two. “The Duel” has
better action. The character development
is better in “Sharpe’s Rifles”. You get
to know Sharpe’s men better than Hornblower’s gun crew. “Rifles” is stronger when it comes to
covering history. The situation on the
Peninsula is clearer than the situation in the English Channel. It has a subplot involving Bas Vivar and his
brother that touches on the conflict between traditional values and the new
Napoleonic emphasis on reason. On the
other hand, “The Duel” is more instructive on sailor life than “Rifles” is
about soldier life. In fact, the only
movie that tops “The Duel” in presenting life aboard a Napoleonic warship is
“Master and Commander”. “Rifles” does a
better job recreating the novel. It
follows the plot quite closely whereas “The Duel” deftly improves on several
chapters from Mister Midshipman Hornblower.
I have a hard time choosing
between the two movies. I am fonder of
“Sharpe’s Rifles” as I am a huge fan of the novels and of Sean Bean. However, from an impartial viewpoint, “The
Duel” is probably the better war movie.
I would think most war movie lovers with no dog in the hunt would find
it better. There is no real reason to
choose. Both are extremely
entertaining. With that said, let me
point out that when one discusses the best war movies, one should not be limited
to theatrical releases. Some of the best
war movies were made for TV and yet most lists do not include them. My list of the 100 Best War Movies will
include any war movie, no matter the format.
These two movies will both be on that list.
GRADES : The
Duel =
A
Rifles = A-
There is so much more to say. As I am a fan of both Cornwell and Forester and both television series. You insist on comparing the two without refering back to the source material. The Sharpe is far closer to its source material, not only with regards to plot points, but to character. Forester's Hornblower is a loner. The closest thing he ever has to a friend is Bush, and that relationship is far more one of Bush's having unabashed hero worship for the hero. Hornblower on paper is far more interesting than he is on screen. The series creators have insisted on creating a warm mentor-relationship between Hornblower and Pellew. This was not so in the book. Hornblower's superiors rarely if ever let him know how much admiration they had for him. His gun crew is pure invention. Creating a "posse" for Hornblower weakens him greatly. His self doubt and reserve would never allow him to develop familiarity with his men. Forester has often been criticized for historical and nautical innacuracies. He was an adventure writer who often got even basic seamanship on Napoleonic vessels wrong. What he did right was very right though. He created a character that was compelling. Sharpe is far more faithful and translates better to the screen.
ReplyDeleteI did not go into the source material because I am preparing Book/Movie posts on them. I appreciate your information and it is sound. As a preview, I have a feeling that I will find that the Hornblower movies are improvements over the books.
DeleteCheck out "Damn The Defiant!" and "Billy Budd". They both do an admirable job at portraying life aboard one of His Majesty's ships. Defiant depicts the events leading up to the Nore Mutiny and Budd shows a courtmartial situation. I have always been partial to the Gibson-Hopkins version of "The Bounty" which was based on the book by Richard Hough rather than the traditional Nordhoff take on the events.
ReplyDeleteI have done a comparison of "Damn the Defiant!" to "Horatio Hornblower" at http://warmoviebuff.blogspot.com/2012/08/dueling-movies-horatio-hornblower-vs.html
DeleteI am preparing a comparison of "Damn the Defiant!" to its source "Mutiny".
I haven't seen or read the Sharpe series (although your review has sparked my interest!) so I will save my comments for Hornblower.
ReplyDeleteThe books are excellent historical adventures. Historical in the way that they explore historical situations of the Napoleonic wars and the mindsets of people living in them (there is an episode where Hornblower, in the interest of his country, gives his "word of honor" that he has news of an important fact - sees his foe accept this as proof of the fact - and then agonizes about how he will live in disgrace for the rest of his life). Adventure in the sense that naval crews from all sides are always trying to take on problems above their weight through a combination of cleverness and audacity. You'd think, after reading these books, that the main weapon of Ships of the Line are rowboats filled with raiding parties.
The series is well done. Although there are clearly strict limitations on what special effects are available the stories are skillfully designed to work within those limitations. It unfortunately indulges in that lazy sort of historical writing where Hornblower and the more sympathetic characters seem to anachronistically share the writer's political opinions while antagonists and unsympathetic characters are strawman monarchists. If you are going to debate political issues in a historical drama why not give people realistic positions and have the courage to let those with whom you disagree put forward good, historically-appropriate arguments for their side so that the audience can better understand the period? No doubt there's a danger of going too shallow or too deep but in Hornblower it seems that they did not really try. For this, and because the series runs much slower than the books, I find the books superior (but would still recommend the series).
Thanks. I hadn't remembered the political stuff. I guess I need to rewatch the series. The series was amazing and it is incredible to me that it was made.
Delete