The
Red Badge of Courage by Stephen
Crane was published in 1895. It is
considered by many to be the best American war novel. The novel is about a soldier in the Civil War
named Henry Fleming. He is nervous going
into his first battle and rightly so as he ends up going through a gamut of
emotions that run from cowardice to heroism.
The book is lauded for its vibrant prose which is rife with
symbolism. Crane described his take on
war as “a psychological portrayal of fear”.
It is also acclaimed for its realism, including its depiction of
combat. It comes as a surprise to many
that Crane did not fight in the war and in fact, was not even born at the time. He researched the war through the “Battles
and Leaders” series. Although the book
is not specific, it is apparently based on the Battle of Chancellorsville.
Crane got his feel for combat partly by listening to the stories of veterans of
the 124th New York Regiment. It first saw action at
Chancellorsville. He was aided by an
article from “Battles and Leaders” entitled “Recollections of a Private” by
Warren Lee Goss. I recently read Goss’
recollections and can see where some feel it was the genesis of the novel. Goss was a reluctant enlistee. He complains about all the drilling. He does a lot of thinking about what battle
will be like (although he is not really pondering how he will perform). His first experience is similar to Henry’s
except it was a “friend” who ran. (Yeah,
right – a friend, wink, wink). Here is
his description of the first time he “saw the elephant”:
The constant hissing of the
bullets, with their sharp ping or bizz whispering around and sometimes into us,
gave me a sickening feeling and a cold perspiration. I felt weak around my
knees a sort~of faintness and lack of strength in the joints of my legs, as if
they would sink from under me. These symptoms did not decrease when several of
my comrades were hit. The little rifle-pits in our front fairly blazed with
musketry, and the continuous snap, snap, crack, crack was murderous. Seeing I
was not killed at once, in spite of all the noise, my knees recovered from
their unpleasant limpness, and my mind gradually regained its balance and
composure. I never afterwards felt these disturbing influences to the same
degree.
How does the novel compare to the
1951 John Huston movie? The movie covers
most of the iconic scenes from the book.
And it borrows extensively from the dialogue. It has the same main characters and their
personalities are the same as in the book.
The movie does omit some scenes, but this may be due to the extensive
cutting the studio did on Huston’s finished cut. Notably, Huston decided to make some minor
changes in details. The changes
included:
- Henry writes a letter to his father saying he
will attempt to make him proud. In the
book, Henry’s father is deceased. There
is a flashback where his mother counsels him to behave himself against the
temptations of soldiering. Huston’s
letter idea does a better job of conveying Henry’s fears of how he will perform
in battle.
- Tom Wilson learns the rumor of the unit
moving forward from another soldier. In
the book, Jim Conklin comes running into camp to proclaim the news. The movie does a better job of conveying how
rumors get spread in the army.
- The foraging soldier is trying to steal a
pig, not a horse. His mates make amusing
remarks at his expense as the woman fights to get her property back. The book plays the scene for more physical
humor. Huston adds some typical soldier
humor with the change.
- Tom gives Henry a watch, not letters like in
the book.
- The Cheery Soldier’s monologue is shortened
and given the themes that war is confusing and death has to be accepted as
God’s will.
- Henry captures the Rebel flag, not Tom.
Most significantly, Huston added some scenes for
entertainment purposes. The more
important ones were:
1. Huston introduces the concept of a battle
wound being referred to as a “red badge of courage” by way of a conversation
Henry has with a Rebel sentry.
2. After Wilson spreads the rumor that they are
about to march off to battle, but before the orders come, his mates toss jibes
at him while in formation.
3. Before battle, a general rides down the line
motivating his troops and promising each unit that he will have supper with
them that night.
Those last two added some nice humor to the humorless
novel. And Huston added the line “After
all the trouble we went to getting that wall, I’d like to set by it a
while.” This serves as the last word on
their battle experience and adds a note of irony to the conclusion.
I
strongly belief that movies should be better than the books they are based
on. Notice I used the word
“should”. Just because some directors
and screenwriters are incompetent does not refute my theory. Unless the book is perfect, it can be
improved upon. A good screenwriter and
director may not be able to make the story more literate, but they should be
able to make it more entertaining. “The
Red Badge of Courage” is a difficult case study. First, it is considered to be one of the great
American novels, so it would be tough to beat.
Second, we don’t know what Huston’s uncut movie would have looked
like. We only have his word that he
considered it his best film up until then.
Even with 50 minutes cut, the movie is still a classic. An underappreciated classic. The additions and changes Huston made did
result in a more entertaining film than if he had adhered more closely to the
book. (If you don’t agree with that
assessment, watch the 1974 version which is very close to the book and sucks.)
Assuming it follows the book, a movie has the advantage of putting the story before you visually.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, as I have previously stated, a book gives you internal monologues a movie generally cannot.
Agree. A book can also offer visuals that even CGI can not replicate. But most importantly, a book is not constrained by time so it can go into more detail.
Delete