SYNOPSIS:
"Schindler's List" is the true story of a German businessman named
Oskar Schindler. Schindler used his war plant to employ Jews who would have
otherwise ended up in concentration camps. He starts off as simply greedy and
ends up a humanitarian. The film, by Steven Spielberg, is the gold standard for
Holocaust films and covers many of the horrific aspects of the Jewish
experience including the cleansing of a ghetto, the train trip to the camp, the
selection process, and the showers. All of this within the framework of a
flawed man's attempt to save as many Jews as he can.
BACK-STORY: “Schindler’s List” was released in 1993 and immediately
took a position among the great movies of any genre. It was produced and
directed by Steven Spielberg. Modestly, he tried to convince Martin Scorsese,
Roman Polanski, and Billy Wilder to direct the pic, but for various reasons
they turned him down. The movie is based on the novel Schindler’s Ark by Thomas Keneally. Keneally was inspired to write
the book by one of the Schindlerjuden (“Schlinder
Jews”). The movie was shot on location in
Krakow, Poland. The film won numerous awards. It was awarded Oscars for
Picture, Director, Adapted Screenplay, Cinematography, Art Direction, Editing,
and Original Score. Liam Neeson was nominated for Best Actor and Ralph Fiennes
for Best Supporting Actor. It was the most expensive black and white film made up
to then (topping “The Longest Day”). It had been 33 years since a black and white movie had won
Best Picture (“The Apartment”). It is #8 on AFIs latest list of greatest American motion
pictures.
TRIVIA:
1. In 1980, author Thomas Keneally stopped at a leather goods store in Los Angeles and the owner Leopold Page told him the story of Schindler and gave him some documents and a copy of the list. This inspired him to write Schindler’s Ark. Page was a consultant for the film.
2. Spielberg learned of the book in 1982 when it was published and later the studio bought the rights, ahead of Billy Wilder who wanted it to be his last film. Spielberg met Page and promised him he would make the movie is the next ten years, but the project sat for over a decade because Spielberg was not ready for such a serious film.
3. Universal was cold toward the movie because it was skeptical of the box office potential. It agreed Speilberg could make the film if he made “Jurassic Park” first.
4. Originally, Warren Beatty was to play Schindler, but Spielberg decided he wanted someone with less clout.
5. Spielberg refused his salary, referring to it as “blood money”. His profits went to establishing the USC Shoah Foundation in 1994. It collects memories and audio-visuals of interviews of Holocaust survivors.
6. Originally, Spielberg wanted Polish and German with subtitles, but then he decided it would take eyes away from the images.
7. The studio did not want black and white, but Spielberg wanted a more serious look and a documentary feel. Cinematographer Janusz Kaminski was inspired by German expressionism and Italian neorealism.
8. Audrey Hepburn told Spielberg about an incident she witnessed as a child in Europe of a little girl with distinctive clothing getting loaded onto a train. Coincidentally, there was a little girl in a red coat that was well-known in the Krakow Ghetto. Roma Ligocka survived, however. She wrote a biography entitled The Girl in the Red Coat. The little girl in the movie was three-year old Olivia Dambrowska. She promised Spielberg not to watch the movie until she turned 18, but she snuck a watch at age 11 and was traumatized. Spielberg meant the girl to represent the U.S. government’s lack of concern for the Holocaust.
9. Ralph Fiennes gained 28 pounds to play Goth.
10. To cheer him up during the filming, Spielberg had Robin Williams call him and do routines. He also watched a lot of “Seinfeld”.
11. It was the first movie shown on TV to get a TV-M (today TV-MA) rating.
12. Spielberg got permission to film in Auschwitz, but decided to just do outside filming out of respect. Most of the film was shot in Poland with the camp being built in an abandoned rock quarry. The filming took 72 days, four days less than scheduled.
Belle
and Blade = N/A
Brassey’s = 5.0
Video Hound = 5.0
War Movies = N/A
Military History = #31
Channel 4 = #4
Film Site = yes
101 War Movies = yes
Rotten Tomatoes = #21
HISTORICAL ACCURACY: This is a difficult
movie to analyze for historical accuracy. There is contradictory evidence on
many of the incidents in the film. However, based on my research, it appears
that the movie is factually accurate for the most part. Keneally is a reputable
author and his novel was well researched. He understandably labeled the book a
novel because he invented dialogue. This is not particularly unusual in the
field of historical fiction. Also, the Schlinderjuden have verified the
accuracy of the film.
Oskar Schindler’s personality and modus vivendi
are realistic. If anything, he was a bigger cad than Neeson portrays him as.
Emilie was certainly a forgiving wife. He was not a one woman man. Neeson gets
the charm right. What is downplayed a bit in the film is Schindler’s voluntary involvement with the Nazis. The movie leads you to
believe he was a Nazi just because it was good for business. This overlooks his
more active role in the Abwehr (German espionage) before arriving in Krakow.
The role of Stern (Ben Kingsley) is apparently close to the real Stern. The “partnership” angle may
be overplayed. There is evidence that the list was more the work of a Marcel
Goldberg and may not have had a lot of input from Schindler. Goldberg was a
loathsome figure who accepted bribes to get people on the list which resulted
in people being removed from the list. The Schindlerjuden did not have fond memories
of him and he would have made a poor character in this film. Some critics claim
Schindler was in jail for bribing Goeth at the time the list was compiled and
that Stern was not working for him any more at the time. I lean toward
Spielberg’s take on this issue.
Goeth is accurately portrayed. The essentials are there. He did snipe at
inmates, but from a hill (his house did not have line of sight to the camp).
The evil haunted mansion on the hill was justified in the film. When Goeth was
executed after the war for war crimes, it was specifically for killing over 500
Jews personally. It could be argued that the real Goeth was more evil and
without any redeeming qualities. It is highly unlikely that Schindler was able
to even temporarily humanize him. As far as his creepy relationship with his
Jewish housekeeper Helen, she appears to be a fictional character.
The depiction of the massacre in the Krakow ghetto is realistic. There even was
a little girl in a red coat although the movie does not try to be accurate on
her. She survived. Living conditions in the camp are well done. The scene in
Auschwitz gives a good idea of what that camp must have been like.
The time line is admirably correct. The movie does not take events out of
sequence. There is a simplifying of how quickly his first plant went from
having a few Jewish workers to all Jewish workers, but this is cinematically
excusable.
With regard to the anecdotal events in the film, they are a mixed lot. Several
are obviously fictional: Schindler rescuing Stern from deportation, Schindler
witnessing the ghetto evacuation from a hill, the Jewish engineer execution.
The kissing of the Jewess at the birthday party is true, however.
The most problematical scene is the women being shipped to Auschwitz. It appears
to be added to the film for emotional manipulation. It is based on an incident
at the same time of some women being rerouted to a camp called Gross-Rosen. A
name that doesn’t quite have the impact of
Auschwitz, does it? As to the women being shoved into what appears to be a gas
chamber, that is almost surely bull crap. Highly effective bull crap.
Interestingly, the movie does not go far enough in the redemption area.
Schindler’s progression to sainthood may seem
Hollywoodized, but it leaves out all the efforts he made for his workers beyond
giving them the security of employment. He spent his own money providing them
food, clothing, and medical care. The movie underplays his encouragement of
their religious rituals which included Jewish burial rites. Most significantly,
the screenwriter chose to leave out an incident where Schindler accepted
shipment of two boxcars of literally frozen Jews and personally aided their
recovery. One less justifiable omission is the role that Emilie played at the
second plant. She achieved sainthood herself by cooking for the workers (who
got 2,000 calories as opposed to the usual 900) and caring for the sick. The
movie gives her nothing to do except stoically support her philandering
husband.
Speaking of Hollywoodizing, the closing pushes the limits of realism. Not
surprising for a Spielberg film. The bit about the ring (as someone sniffed,
you can’t melt gold the way they did) and the
final speech are on the cheesy side. It might have been a good idea to tack on
the actual survivor scene to leave that as the last image.
CRITIQUE: Is it possible to make a film
about the Holocaust that shows its horrors and yet is inspirational and has a
happy ending? This would seem undoable without hitting a hornet’s nest worth of derision. Amazingly, Spielberg has pulled it
off. The achievement is awe-inspiring. This is especially impressive because
Spielberg stepped out of his comfort zone to make a movie that was not aimed at
14 year-old boys. It is really his first adult movie and he deserved to be
rewarded for it.
The movie is technically top notch. The choice to go black and white was a
daring gamble that pays off big time. It is now hard to imagine the movie in
color. The cinematography was an easy choice for the Oscar. The lighting
enhances the lensing. The look of the film is not ostentatious, however. You do
not marvel at what you are seeing, you just register its proficiency. John
Williams (who at first thought he was not up to the seriousness of the film) is
nicely understated in his score and does not push emotional buttons like you
hear in many epic movies (including some of Spielberg’s
more recent films). His Oscar was deserved. It was his last victory.
The acting is fantastic. Neeson gives his best performance. He nails the
complex personality of Schindler. Schindler’s
redemption arc must not have been easy to play. The character is refreshingly
multi-dimensional . Neeson even handles the final speech without marring the
rest of his restrained work. Ralph Fiennes matches him. Fiennes gained almost
thirty pounds by drinking a lot of beer to get ready for the role. He is the
embodiment of malevolence. AFI placed Goeth at #15 on its list of Top 50
Villains (Goeth is the highest nonfiction character). Kingsley has a less flashy
role, but his portrayal of the wary and wily Stern is perfect. The supporting
cast is solid. Special note goes to Embeth Davidtz as Helen Hirsh who lives in
constant fear of Goeth’s mood swings. The scene where he
soliloquys to a petrified, very vulnerable Helen and goes from positing that
Jews are not subhuman vermin to ruthlessly beating her is a strong scene with
great acting. There are several scenes in the movie that showcase the talents
of the cast.
The plot is linear and traditional. There are surprises within the structure,
but the general flow is toward your typical Spielberg positive ending.
Thankfully, the ending is relatively true so it does not come off as contrived.
Although there is no evidence for it, you would think Spielberg looked hard for
a Holocaust script that had a happy ending. Those are pretty rare. (“Escape from Sobibor” had
already been filmed.) The themes are fairly clear. Obviously, redemption is one
of them. Some others are that evil exists and can’t
be cured. One man can make a difference is another. Lastly, the movie
emphasizes the role of conscience in human behavior. Goeth’s lack of conscience makes him, not Helen, subhuman. The film
is thought-provoking. You can’t watch the
movie without wondering what you would have done in the situations presented in
it.
CONCLUSION: “Schindler’s List” is the best Holocaust movie. You
can argue that it is not relentlessly bleak enough to truly replicate the
horror, but that would have defeated the purpose of reaching a mass audience.
As a retired high school history teacher I have no problem with this
compromise. The movie has enough horror to teach fools that the Holocaust was
horrific. There is nothing wrong with having positive role models in a
Holocaust film. I personally would not
have it as high as #2, but it clearly belongs in the top ten.
100. The Manchurian Candidate (1962)
99. The Bridges at Toko-Ri
98. Mrs. Miniver
97. To Hell and Back
96. Run Silent, Run Deep
95. The Alamo (1960)
94. Sands of Iwo Jima
93. Land and Freedom
92. Ulzana’s Raid
91. The Sea Hawk
90. The Man Who Would Be king
89. Hail the Conquering Hero
88. The Cruel Sea
87. They Died With Their Boots On
86. Foreign Correspondent
85. Ride With the Devil
84. Casualties of War
83. The Train
82. Empire of the Sun
81. Life Is Beautiful
80. Twelve O’Clock High
79. The Story of G.I. Joe
78. She Wore a Yellow Ribbon
77. Catch-22
76. Oh! What a Lovely War
75. The Tin Drum
74. Scipio Africanus
73. Ministry of Fear
72. Colonel Redl
71. The Third Man
70. Battleground
69. Beau Geste
68. Three Kings
67. Hell’s Angels
66. Hope and Gloty
65. Pork Chop Hill
64. Good Morning, Vietnam
63. Gettysburg
62. Battleship Potemkin
61. Tora! Tora! Tora!
60. Kagemashu
59. The African Queen
58. Duck Soup
57. Notorious
56. The Searchers
55. The Dawn Patrol (1938)
54. Best Years of Our Lives
53. The Dam Busters
52. The Killing Fields
51. Birth of a Nation
50. Ballad of a Soldier
49. The Big Parade
48. In Which We Serve
47. Gallipoli
46. Stalag 17
45. Sergeant York
44. Wings
43. The Last of the Mohicans (1992)
42. Battle of Britain
41. Guns of Navarone
40. The Deer Hunter
39. A Bridge Too Far
38. El Cid
37. Breaker Morant
36. The Thin Red Line (1998)
35. Cross of Iron
34. Braveheart
33. Charge of the Light Brigade (1936)
32. The Dirty Dozen
31. Rome, Open City
30. From Here to Eternity
29. The Longest Day
28. Spartacus
27. Alexander Nevsky
26. The Big Red Line
25. The General
24. Stalingrad (1992)
23. Platoon
22. Battle of Algiers
21. MASH
20. The Great Escape
19. The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp
18. Ran
17. Napoleon
16. Full Metal Jacket
15. All Quiet on the Western Front (1930)
14. Apocalypse Now
13. Glory
12. Dr. Strangelove
11. Casablanca
10. Paths of Glory
9. Bridge on the River Kwai
8. Das Boot
7. Saving Private Ryan
6. Henry V (1944)
5. Grand Illusion
4. Patton
3. Lawrence of Arabia
2. Schindler’s List
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please fell free to comment. I would love to hear what you think and will respond.