“The Thin Red Line” was the first filming of James
Jones’ novel. It was directed by Andrew
Marton (“Men of the Fighting Lady”). It
was filmed in Spain which was seemingly an odd choice for representing Guadalcanal. The movie is not particularly well known and
many think Terence Malick was the first to take on the novel. Let’s see if the earlier movie was as bad as
the new one.
The movie opens with an Army unit on a transport off
“the island”. Sgt. Welsh (Jack Warden)
is a hard-ass whose philosophy is that he needs to prepare his men for the
insanity of war by modeling insanity.
“If it’s insanity they are going to face, get them ready for it now.... There is only a thin red line between the
sane and the insane.” Capt. Stone (Ray
Daley) disagrees with this mantra,but is not sure if Welsh might not be
right. The movie’s plot will center
around the dysfunctional relationship between Welsh and a private named Doll
(Keir Dullea). Doll is a soldier whose
first priority is survival. To that end,
he steals a pistol while below deck on the ship. This purloining gets Doll deeper into Welsh’s
dog house. For some reason, Welsh hates
Doll. Meanwhile, the other dynamic
involves Lt. Col. Tall (James Philbrook – are you getting the impression that
this movie’s cast does not rival the 1998 version?) questioning Stone’s
toughness. Tall feels Stone coddles his
men. He is perturbed that Stone is not enthusiastic about a suicide attack
against “The Elephant” (think “Ant Hill” from “Paths of Glory”). The attack will include a trek through “The
Bowling Alley” which is a mine-infested ravine.
Tall feels losing men is part of the effort. Stone wonders why it has to be his men. The rest of the movie deals with the attack and
the evolution of the Welsh-Doll and Stone/Tall relationships.
“The Thin Red Line” is a strange movie, but not in
the same way as Malick’s opus. Malick’s
movie was marred by its pretentiousness, Marton’s is off-kilter because of its
flawed character development. Welsh just
shows flashes of insanity, otherwise he’s just a jerk. Doll never shows his survive at all costs
mentality. His transformation into the
best warrior in the unit is not believable.
On the other side of the coin, Tall goes from Patton to Montgomery by
the end of the movie. The two character
pairs don’t work and it does not help that the actors are not up to it
anyhow. Warden is the only one who
acquits himself well, but he is not helped by the inconsistency of his
character. Dullea chews scenery and this
is amplified by the fact that little of what Doll does makes sense. Doll has a best friend named Fife (Bob
Kanter). In the novel, Fife was famously
gay, but in a 1964 movie the closest they could come to that was having Fife
dress up in some women’s clothing they find in a village. Don’t ask.
The rest of the cast is low-rent and it shows. Fortunately, the movie has lots of action to
balance its philosophizing. There are
several combat scenes and they are all above average for a black and white WWII
film. One of them (after they capture a
Japanese village, the enemy ambush them) is balls to the wall ridiculous, but
fun and unique. Naturally, the percent
of dead to wounded is very high, but that’s par for the course in movies of
this generation. Needless to say, there
is no blood or bullet holes. We also get
the usual touchdown signaling deaths. The score is intrusive in its mood-setting
sincerity.
I don’t think we will ever get a good rendering of
Jones’ novel. “The Thin Red Line” in
print is the story of a unit of soldiers.
Both movies have concentrated on just a few characters and ladled the
philosophy on thick. I prefer the 1964
version, not because it is a superior movie, but because it does not take
itself seriously. I hope not,
anyway. There are some bizarre scenes,
so being a little drunk would enhance your viewing. For example, at one point, the unit sends in
a flaming jeep full of explosives to lead off an attack! Just like what really happened on Guadalcanal! So don’t watch this movie (or the other one)
as a tutorial on the campaign. Jones
fought on the island and his book is semi-autobiographical, but little of that
made it into the movies. We still need a
good movie on that campaign. And how
about covering the Navy effort as well.
I guess we’ll need a miniseries.
GRADE = C+
I hate Malick's The Thin Red Line. It's so chock full of existential BS. Oh war is bad, look at the pretty leaves, etc. To this day I get riled up thinking how I wasted my time and money watching it. The worst war movie in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteAgree. See my review. Go to Archives.
ReplyDeleteI went back and read your review of Malick's version. I had just read the book to prepare myself before I watched the movie...and really wondered what the heck happened!!! Thought the movie was awful!
ReplyDeleteI thought we would be like-minded on it.
Delete