With the recent
events in Afghanistan, many have rekindled memories of the fall of Saigon and
America’s chaotic exit from South Vietnam.
This reminded me of the movie “A Bright Shining Lie”. HBO produced this version of the book by Neil
Sheehan. Sheehan won a Pulitzer for “A
Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and
America in Vietnam”. The acclaimed book
came out in 1989. Sheehan had known Vann
in South Vietnam and used him as a proxy for the American effort in
Vietnam. The movie was written and
directed by Terry George (“Hotel Rwanda”).
It was well received and was nominated for an Emmy. Bill Paxton was nominated for a Golden Globe.
The
movie opens strong with the Jefferson Airplane’s “Somebody to Love” over the
credits with footage of napalm and white phosphorus exploding. “When the truth is found to be lies.” This will be one of the themes of the
movie. John Vann (Paxton) is a Lt. Col.
who is excited to go to Vietnam because he wants a taste of war and he realizes
fast promotions come with combat. The
movie advances the motivation by career soldiers early in the war that “it’s
the only war we’ve got”. Vann leaves his
wife and kids thus firmly establishing the war before women cliché. When he arrives in Saigon in 1962, he
befriends Steve Burnett (Donal Logue). (Burnett
is based on David Halberstam.) It will
be a reciprocal relationship as Paxton uses Burnett to criticize policies and
Burnett gets confirmation of his belief that the war is not going well. Vann is the rare American who falls in love
with South Vietnam. He shacks up with a
Vietnamese woman, but that is typical for a man who takes his marital vows
loosely.
Vann
has a theory that the key to defeating communism in Vietnam is to boost the
peasants. This of course contradicts the
plans of Diem’s government. Diem has no
intention of treating the peasants with respect. Vann is assigned as military adviser to a
Gen. Cao. When he arrives at the camp,
he learns that the ARVN (S. Vietnam’s army) is faking the body count. He also learns that the ARVN are not
interested in confronting the Viet Cong in battle. He participates in battles where the
reluctance of the ARVN soldiers to duke it out is very frustrating. Vann is not the type to take frustration
stoically. He makes enemies of ARVN
generals and his superiors. But he is
eventually allowed to try his “hearts and minds” strategy out. There is a sequence where he and Doug Elders
(based on Daniel Ellsburg) help improve a school with disastrous results. Even
when America is altruistic, it hurts the South Vietnamese peasansts. He is there for the Tet Offensive and for Vietnamization
under Nixon. At the end, he is
attempting to prove that if properly trained and led (by him), the ARVN can
defeat the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army.
Kind of like the belief by some that the Afghan army would be able to
beat the Taliban.
“A
Bright Shining Lie” is a biopic of a fascinating individual. This is how Burnett eulogizes him: “John Paul Vann was America’s warrior. He personifies our good intentions, our
arrogance, our courage, and ultimately, our folly”. Paxton is great as this complex man. He comes off less as a hero than as a Don
Quixote. There is enough of his personal
life to prove he is a cad and a poor father.
Burnett makes a good foil as his pessimistic views of the war are
contrasted with Vann, who goes from pissing into the tent to pissing from in
the tent.
The
movie has some fairly high production values for a made-for-TV movie. Saigon is recreated nicely. Unfortunately, the battle scenes are low
rent. The two battles (Ap Bac and
Kontum) are very simplified. But the
emphasis is on Vann and he is allowed to participate in the action. In one scene, he snipes two Viet Cong who are
on the run from his chopper. He acts as
a one man blocking force after the Vietnamese commander refuses to put his men
in that position. This dude walks the
walk and talks the talk. That talking
means he does not shy from telling off his Vietnamese superiors. Or slapping them.
The
problem with the movie is it has two hours to cover ten years. We get the greatest hits of Vann’s career and
two of his affairs. This leaves little
time for his training of ARVN soldiers and his tactic of aggressive
patrolling. There is a taste of his
attempts to win over the peasants (with disastrous results that Afghan War
veterans can relate to). We also get an
idea of the military incompetence and corruption of ARVN leadership and the
poor morale of the men. Sound familiar?
If
you want to see analogies to the Afghan War, “A Bright Shining Lie” is better
for the beginning of the war than for the end of it. Vann’s attempts to build up a viable fighting
force ring a bell, but the movie concludes with a battle that seems to confirm
that Vietnamization might work. It does
not get to the chaotic withdrawal from Saigon because Vann did not make it that
far. He certainly would have been one of
the last to leave. I would hope that the
book was required reading in the Pentagon before and during the Afghan
War. The movie was also available for
the nonreaders. If so, the lessons were
not learned. It is incredible that the
military thought that Afghanistanization would work. We had no Vann and the conditions were much more
challenging.
GRADE = B
