Hell to Eternity (1960)

 

               “Hell to Eternity” is a biopic of Guy Babaldon. He was a Marine who was awarded the Navy Cross for his bravery during the invasion of Saipan in WWII. It was directed by Phil Karlson (“Hornet’s Nest”). He was able to film on Okinawa.  It cost $800,000 and made about $2,800,000. 

               Guy (Jeffrey Hunter) is a juvenile delinquent and a bad-ass in high school. His dad is dead and his mom is in the hospital. His PE teacher takes him in. Guy, who is Hispanic, is adopted by the teacher’s  Nisei family. Ten years later, after Pearl Harbor, the father and mother are relocated to an internment camp. His two adoptive brothers enlist in the famous 442^nd Regimental Combat Team. Guy enlists in the Marines. Because he learned Japanese from the family, he becomes an interpreter. He bonds with Staff Sergeant Bill Hazen (David Janssen). They land as part of the first wave on the island of Saipan. His job is to coax Japanese soldiers and civilians into coming out of their hiding places, like caves. The death of a close friend snaps Guy and he becomes a Rambo. (The scene is reminiscent of Audie Murphy in “To Hell and Back” when his best friend is killed.)

               Although “Hell to Eternity” is a biopic, but it is closer to a standard WWII in the Pacific war movie. There is plenty of action on the island which is good because it takes the movie a boring while to get there. There is a particularly bad scene where Guy woos a woman in a bar, just so she can appear on the movie poster. The movie drops her like a hot potato and suddenly Guy is on Saipan. In spite of the availability of 500 Marines from a nearby camp and a lot of Japanese veterans, the beach assault is small scale and unrealistic. The veterans are used in a daylight banzai charge. The Marines charge out to meet them in no man’s land! Marines aren’t cowards that stay in their fox holes to mow Japanese exposing themselves to their firepower. At least, that’s what the movie wants you to think.  We get a chaotic melee with poorly choreographed hip-shooting and hand-to-hand fighting. It’s laughable and very inauthentic when it comes to tactics. The battlefield is left with dead bodies aplenty. Of course, no one is wounded. Now it’s time for Guy to do his job. There is a montage of him talking Japanese out of caves. It’s all so easy. No Japanese soldier refuses to surrender. This all changes after his buddy is killed. Now Guy shoots surrendering Japanese, until he gets a letter from his adoptive mother. He snaps back in time to negotiate with the Japanese commanding general. The campaign on Saipan is rife with silliness. Since the movie was released in 1960, American cinema was in its “Japan was a respected foe” phase. Its soldiers are not depicted as fanatical in this movie. And Americans are shown treating prisoners fairly. Well, most of the time.

               The cast is average and benefits from Jeffrey Hunter (who was an underrated actor) and David Janssen. The cinematography and score are ordinary. It’s just a typical B-movie. It was entertaining back in its day, but for most discerning war movie lovers today, it is too long and it is unrealistic. It insulted my intelligence, but I don’t think you need to be knowledgeable about the war in the Pacific to know that the combat is silly. Try watching this after the Peleliu scenes in “The Pacific” limited series. The gulf in quality and realism is huge.

               HISTORICAL ACCURACY:  The movie is pretty accurate. Gabaldon was in a gang in high school His life turned aroune when he went to live with the Nakanos. He learned to speak Japanese. When the family was relocated, he moved to Alaska to work in a cannery. When he reached age 17, he enlisted in the Marines. He went through basic training and was designated an interpreter. On the first night, Guy went out on his own to bring in prisoners. He was threatened with court martial for leaving his post without leave. But he kept going out. Sometimes he shot the guards and then talked the soldiers and civilians into coming out of the cave. He became known as the “Pied Piper of Saipan”. July 7 marked the largest banzai attack of the war.  On July 8, 1943, Gabaldon talked to a Japanese officers and convinced them the battle was over and he should surrender. Around 800 Japanese came in. He was credited with 1,500 on both Saipan and Tinian. (There has been  some disputing of his record and some argue that he was a self-promoter.)  I found no reference to his cracking and killing a lot of Japanese. Guy Gabaldon was the technical adviser on the film (and later named one of his kids after Jeffrey Hunter).  He did not put a stop to the sequence where he became a mass-killer.

 

GRADE  =  C-

A Hill in Korea (1956)

               “A Hill in Korea” (“Hell in Korea” in American theaters) is the first British film set in the Korean War. It was based on the novel by Max Catto (“Murphey's War”). He was inspired by a true incident in the war. The movie has a cast of recognizable British thespians, including Michael Caine in his first credited film role (eight years before “Zulu”, his third film). Caine was a veteran of the Korean War and saw Chinese hordes up close and personal. He was a conscript or as they were called in Great Britain, a “National Serviceman”. Most of the characters in the unit are these soldiers famously known for being old enough to fight, but not to vote. He remembered his performance in the film with self-deprecating humor. He said he had only eight lines and screwed up six of them. Being the only Korean War veteran in the cast, he tried to be an unofficial technical adviser, with no success. He pointed out that a patrol would have been more spread out, but was informed the camera could not cover a wide formation. His suggestion that officers would not have worn insignia that identified them as targets was ignored for obvious reasons. He did not bother to point out that Portugal looked nothing like Korea because he wanted to go on location there.

               The movie is set in May, 1951 during the period when the United Nations forces are dealing with Chinese offensives. A British patrol of 17 men is trying to avoid being cut off by Chinese forces. It is obvious from the start that the movie will fit squarely in the “who will survive?” subgenre. The whittling begins immediately with one of the men dying from a booby trap. Other deaths will be from a grenade, a minor scratch, falling rubble, sniper, friendly bombs, and a suicide attack. Sadly, one of the first deaths is Robert Shaw as Lance Cpl. Hodge. Green Lt. Butler (George Baker) leads the unit with help from Sgt. Payne (Harry Andrews).  The patrol is going to have to fight its way just to get to its Alamo which is a temple on a hill. There are plenty of “gooks” or “chinks” to slaughter.

               “A Hill in Korea” benefits from a good cast without a lot of stereotypes. You do get the unseasoned leader who grows into the job with the help of his sergeant, but there is little dysfunction over his leadership. One of the men is a coward who gets redemption. Stanley Baker plays his usual hard-ass. The deaths are not predictable and there is a variety, although some are unrealistic. One stands out. They get bombed by American planes! You don’t expect friendly fire in a movie like this.

               The action is as close to combat porn as you could expect from a 1956 British war movie. And this was eight years before “Zulu”. The Chinese are depicted as savages similar to the Zulus or Indians in old westerns. Only worse, they are commies! Watching this film gives you a clear idea of how China was viewed in the 1950s. Michael Caine did not try to correct that facet of the film. In a biography, he mentioned that he was sympathetic toward communism until he fought in Korea where he encountered the brainless attacks by indoctrinated Chinese. He must have agreed with quotes like “They seem to want to die.” Or:  “Chinks don’t know the joys of living so they fight like it’s a joy to die.” However, it is a fact that the Chinese did use frontal attacks that led to heavy casualties. The movie is one of the more realistic Korean War movies in its depiction of combat. The Chinese use bugles and whistles to signal attacks. The Brits respond with Bren machine guns and they do reload. They put out aircraft recognition panels, although that doesn’t work in one occasion. They use covering fire to get a bazooka close enough to take out a tank.

               “A Hill in Korea” is one of the better Korean War b-movies. It is noteworthy as one of the few British movies set in the war. Americans should watch it as a reminder that the Brits did help us in the war, including young British who were drafted to help us save South Korea. You might want to note that they did not do the same thing in Vietnam. Because of this movie?

GRADE  =  B

The Devil’s Disciple (1987)

               In my opinion, “The Devil’s Disciple” (1959) is one of the 100 best war movies. It is also one of the top five movies about the American Revolution. Based on a play by George Bernard Shaw, the dialogue is excellent and so is its cast that included Kirk Douglas, Burt Lancaster, and Sir Laurence Olivier. There was absolutely no reason to remake it. The new version could not equal, much less exceed, the original. I can only assume that someone thought there were enough people who had not seen the 1959 version and were not aware of it, to justify a reboot. At least no one spent money in a theater to see it. It was made-for-tv and it shows.

               For those not familiar with the 1959 film, “The Devil’s Disciple” is set in 1777. Gen. John Burgoyne (Ian Richardson in the Olivier role) and his army are on their campaign to cut the New England colonies off from the rest of the colonies. He is frustrated with the unsporting rebels who are fighting a guerrilla war against the Brits. Into this historical event are thrust a trio of colonists. Reverand Anderson (Patrick Stewart in the Lancaster role) and his wife Judith (Susan Wooldridge) are living peaceful lives with no connection to the Revolution. Richard Dudgeon (Mike Gwilym  in the Douglas role) is a ne’er do well who some would call the devil’s disciple. Judith is repulsed by Dudgeon because he is the opposite of her stable, rule-following husband. Guess who falls in love with this bad boy. Dudgeon breaks character to admit to a rules violation by the rule-following reverend. Dudgeon, masquerading as the reverand, is put on trial for treason. The previously pious prior has to tap into his inner machismo to prevent an atheist from being hanged.

               I already mentioned there was no reason to make this movie. It pales by comparison to the original. This is especially apparent in the acting. Even Stewart does not acquit himself well. Gwilym has nowhere near the charisma to play Dudgeon. It is much more like a play than the previous film which means it has less action. Unfortunately, it does not even bother to be witty. Do not watch this movie instead of the 1959 version!!!

GRADE  =  D

 

Commissar (1967)

            The film is based on a short story by Vasily Grossman entitled “In the Town of Beroychev”. It is set in a small town in Ukraine. It was directed by Aleksandr Askoldov. It is his only film because it got him in hot water. Although it was released during the Khrushchev Thaw, it got into trouble with the government’s censors. Askolddov refused to change the portrayal of the Jewish family. It also did not fit the heroic realism expected of Soviet films. The timing of its possible release during the 50^th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution meant it drew special attention and was deemed not patriotic enough.  Askoldov lost his job, was kicked out of the Communist Party, branded a social parasite, and was banned from making any more films. It was finally released in 1988 due to glasnost. It was awarded the Silver Bear – Special Jury Prize at the 38^th Berlin International Film Festival.

            The movie takes place during the Russian Civil War. A Red Army unit moves into the town of Beroychev. One of the commissars is a woman named Klavdia (Nonna Nordyukova). She’s more manly than the men. When a deserter is captured, she has him executed. No man is going to be more communist than her. Suddenly, she finds herself pregnant. She is distressed. Having a baby that will interfere with her job of protecting communism is not very patriotic. She has tried hard to be considered just as good as the male officers and now this pregnancy is a clear reminder that she is still a woman. When the unit moves on, she is boarded with a Jewish family. The empathetic family softens her. The baby becomes less and less of a distraction from her career path. She ditches her uniform for civilian clothes and is accepted by the community. She bonds with the baby and even sings a lullaby, an act totally out of character. This idyllic life is threatened by the approach of the White Army. This is ominous for the Jewish family and reminds Klavkia that she is still officially a commissar. She has a decision to make.

            “Commissar” is made more interesting because of its back-story. I did not read up on it until after I had seen it. To tell the truth, I did not guess that the film was controversial. In fact, the film would not be considered controversial if it had been made and released during glasnost. I have seen a lot of Soviet films and this one does stand out. There are other portrayals of women in uniform, but this is the first one I have seen where there is a female officer as a main character. She is a commissar because the character must choose between the traditional life of a woman and the life of a dedicated communist. The other element that seems to foreshadow modern Russian cinema is the depiction of the Jewish family. Their ethnicity is not a major factor. Klavdia is not an anti-semite needing redemption. The film makes it clear that the arrival of the White Army will likely lead to a pogrom. The audience is not encouraged to root for this. “Commissar” has been credited with being the first Soviet film to show Jews sympathetically.  

It’s a bit pretentious. At one point, we see riderless horses running. Symbolism! There are odd camera angles and facial closeups. It’s a Soviet war film after all. So, you won’t be surprised that the main character is a respected officer. Spoiler alert: the main theme is motherhood or motherland. Kvadia is meant to be a role model for Soviet women. But is she a role model for mothers?  

“Commissar” is available with English subtitles on YouTube. While overrated, I recommend it because of the story behind it. I would not make it the first Soviet film you watch. There are plenty more that are better. 

GRADE  =  C