Beau Geste (1966)

 

                   If you don’t like classic movies directed by William Wellman and starring Gary Cooper, Ray Milland, and Robert Preston, you might want to check out a remake from 1966.  That was the year some brainiac decided that the Beau Geste (1939) version could be improved upon with a second rate cast, a one-time movie director, and less from the famous novel.  Before you say “at least it’s in color”, the 1939 was in color, too.  So, if there wasn’t a change in color, what was “improved”?  The brothers Geste are Americans.  There are no scenes from when they were children.  There are no pesky female characters yammering away.  (No female speaks in this movie.)  And the villain’s name was changed just to confuse people.  And one brother was deleted because who needs a guy named Digby?

                   The movie opens in 1906 in the Sahara desert.  A unit of French Legionnaires arrives at a fort that is on fire.  Beau Geste (Guy Stockwell) is the only survivor.  Flashback to Beau and John (Doug McClure) enlisting in the French Foreign Legion after Beau fled from home, taking the blame for an act of embezzlement.  They are put under the charge of the dastardly Sgt. Dagineau (Telly Savalas).  He oversees the requisite training montage that includes marching blind-folded toward a cliff to instill blind obedience.  As if he were not a martinet already, Dagineau receives an anonymous letter threatening him with death.  He focuses his suspicions on Beau.  With the help of a toady named Boldini (David Mauro), he makes life rough for Beau and the rest of the unit.  Things get worse when they are sent to relieve the garrison at the isolated Fort Zinderneuf.   On the way, they are ambushed by the native Tauregs and Dagineau takes command when they reach the fort.  A mutiny against his tyrannic rule is interrupted by a besieging Taureg army. 

                   My advice would be to only watch this movie if you have not read the novel and seen the 1939 movie.  If you have seen the movie, you will spend the whole time wondering why the Hell the screenwriter made such ridiculous changes in the plot.  None of the changes are for the better.  And none of them make sense for box office reasons. Other than the nationalistic changing of Beau and John to Americans.  I’m sure that brought in thousands of Americans who refused to see the original because it was too British.  Unfortunately, this was probably balanced by all the female moviegoers lost by the elimination of women from the film.  Producer Walter Seltzer was attracted to the escapism, adventure, and romance of the earlier version and then he allowed his movie to dilute all those elements.  Another element that made the 1939 version wonderful was the incorporation of a mystery involving the stolen gem.  To drop that element was a very questionable decision for a low budget movie lacking star power.  Speaking of star power, the only reason for doing a remake would have been to see the modern equivalents of Cooper, MIlland, and Preston reenacting the plot. 

                   The best word for the movie is mediocre.  The cast is that of a made-for-TV movie.  Stockwell is bland as the supposed to be dashing Beau and McClure is too sincere as John.  The casting of Savalas for the Brian Donlevy role was a good one.  He is effective as the villain and is the only actor who comes out of this with his head held high.  The action scenes were meant to be the showstoppers, but they are those of a B western.  The Tauregs had just as soon have been Indians attacking a fort.  As usual in a movie of this type (and most B war movies), no enemy is ever wounded.  If shot, they are dead. Until one is just wounded at the end for plot purposes.

                   Just watch the earlier one again.

GRADE  =  C- 

Beau Geste TV series (1982)

                   In 1982, another stab at the P.C. Wren novel was made.  This time by the BBC.  It was divided into eight 30-minute episodes.  It was directed by Douglas Camfield, who did a lot of the “Doctor Who” episodes.  It was filmed in England, including the desert scenes.  As is usual for BBC productions, it follows the source material closely.  Much more closely than any other version.  It is the best option if you do not want to read the novel.  That does not mean it is the best option for entertainment.  Fidelity is not always the best approach for screenwriters.  The novel is a classic, but the 1939 movie made changes for the better.  In this case, it was wisely decided to not try to replicate that movie.  This was wise given the cast available.  Think opposite of Gary Cooper, Ray Milland, Robert Preston, and Brian Donlevy.  Add a low budget. 

GRADE =  C

The Last Legion (2007)

 

            “The Last Legion” is a Dino De Laurentis production. For those of my generation, that used to mean the film was likely a bloated all-star epic, like “Battle of the Bulge” and “Anzio”.  It was one of the last movies that he produced. The film was directed by Doug Lefler, who only had a few television episodes to his credit. It was based on the novel by Valerio Manfredi who helped co-write the screenplay. The story combines two legends because two is better than one, right?  Those legends are the legend of King Arthur, specifically the sword in the stone, and Rome’s Lost Legion. 

            A narrator tells us the movie is set in the waning days of the Roman Empire. A sword made for Julius Caesar had been passed down from emperor to emperor until Tiberius had it hidden upon his death. The sword has magical powers and Rome could sure use them as it is being threatened by barbarians led by Odoacer (Peter Mullan). Rome is pulling back its legions, including the ones in Britain. A Roman general named Aurelius (Colin Firth) has returned to guard the emperor, a boy named Romulus Augustulus (Thomas Brodie-Sangster). When the Goths capture Rome, Romulus is taken captive, but Aurelius escapes. Ambrosinus (Ben Kingsley) is a Merlin-like (actually closer to Obi Wan) advisor who convinces Odoacer to exile Romulus rather than kill him. The suddenly sympathetic barbarian agrees. Aurelius and Mira (Aishwarya Rai) rescue Romulus, who has discovered the sword hidden in Tiberius’ villa. He who finds it is destined to rule (or in this case rerule). The motley crew go on an odyssey that leads to Britain where they hook up with the Lost Legion. The legionaries had stayed in Britain and are now farmers. They will come out of retirement as Romulus is being chased by Goths and they hook up with an evil Britannic chieftain. Let the clanging continue! 

            How could such a good cast make such a bad movie? Clearly, the problem was in the script. By trying to combine two totally unrelated legends, we get a mish-mash that is mostly mush. Trying to jam the Arthur legend into the fall of the Roman Empire requires too much reality suspension. And, in spite of the unique attempt to combine the legends, the movie still ends up predictable. Everything that happens has been done in other medieval movies. The villains are mustache-twirlers. The heroes are saintly. Their dialogue is trite and embarrassing for thespians like Firth and Kingsley. I wonder if they were told beforehand that the movie was going to premiere in Abu Dhabi. That should have caused some second-thoughts about signing on, but then again, they have nobody to blame but themselves since they had access to the script. Maybe they were in it for the free trip to Abu Dhabi.

            Typical of a De Laurentis production, the action scenes are second-rate. The CGI is terrible. The soundtrack is Disneyesque. The action scenes look like they are copying a Bruce Lee movie. The combat keeps trying to top itself with more and more ahistorical weapons. For example, we are treated to a multi-arrow launcher. The choreography is brainless and derivative. On the plus side, the 9^th Legion “rides to the rescue” in a testudo.

            “The Last Legion” was the first of three movies that featured Roman legionaries in Britain. The others were “Centurion” in 2010 and “The Eagle” in 2011. I am a big fan of Roman history, in particular the Roman army. It is always nice to see movies on that subject, but we have not been too blessed with these movies. “Centurion” is a B movie and “The Eagle” is a C. Both are entertaining, if disappointing. “The Last Legion” is just an embarrassment.

GRADE  =  D  

Morituri (1965)

Today is the 16th anniversary of the first post on this blog. I am proud that I have continued for this long and have no plans to end any time soon. At the time I started, it was a project to watch all of Military History magazine's 100 Greatest War Movies. One per week. That turned out to be wildly optimistic, especially since I soon decided to review other war movies. And then when I completed all 100 of the supposed greatest war movies, I moved on to my own 100 Best War Movies. If you had told me in 2010 that I would write reviews for over 700 war movies, I would have laughed and said "There are not 700 war movies". Well, it turns out there are a lot more than 700, so I still have a long "to be reviewed" list. Thanks to all who have followed this blog. 

For this anniversary post, I chose a movie that is not well known. One goal of this blog is to introduce war movie fans to movies they have not seen. "Morituri" has a special connection to me because I watched it when I was at my grandparent's home after my grandma died.  Funny how movies can be memorable because of the situation when they were watched. 

            “Morituri” is based on the 1958 book by German author Werner Luddecke.  He got the title from the gladiator salute:  “Morituri te salutant” (“We who are about to die, salute you.”).  It was directed by Bernhard Wicki (“Die Brucke”).  The movie was a bomb, despite its stellar cast.  It didn’t help that Marlon Brando had to be forced to do a publicity tour due to contractual obligations.  At his first press conference, he said:  “You will be unable to proceed in life unless you see Morituri.”  The studio shut down his tour.  The movie was well received by critics and nominated for Academy Awards for Best Black and White Cinematography and Best Black and White Costume Design (for a movie that is almost totally on a cargo ship).  It was rereleased as “The Saboteur:  Code Name Morituri”.

            The movie begins in 1942 Japan.  A British colonel (Trevor Howard) blackmails a German explosives expert into doing a special mission that will win the war.  Crain (Brando) is a pacifist who left Germany because of Nazism.  The job is to disarm the scuttling charges on board the SS Ingo, so it can’t be sunk before a British warship intercepts and boards.  The ship is carrying a cargo of rubber to France.  For some unspecified reason that rubber can not make it to the German war machine.  (Don’t ask why the British don’t just sink the ship.)  Captain Mueller (Yul Brenner) is an anti-Nazi with a past.  He lost a ship because he was drunk.  He does not welcome Crain aboard because Crain’s false identity is that of an SS officer.  Mueller’s executive officer Kruse is happy to have a kindred spirit on board.  The ship has a motley crew that includes political prisoners who are being punished for their anti-Nazi views.  Crain secretly meanders the bowels of the ship disarming the explosives.  Things get complicated when the ship encounters a Japanese sub with German officers on board.  They transfer some American prisoners and a Jewish woman named Esther (Janet Margolin).  She has been raped several times, but remains feisty.  The movie builds to a climax that includes a mutiny and a change of Crain’s plans. 

            I saw “Morituri” when I was a freshman in college and it was memorable.  It took me several decades to watch it again.  The film is not well-known, partly as a result of it being deemed a failure.  It is an odd bird.  It certainly has an imaginative plot.  Unfortunately, to get where it is going, it has to jump through some hoops that make some of the developments implausible.  That does not mean that the movie is laughable.  This despite having Wally Cox in the cast.  He plays a doctor who is addicted to morphine!  It is actually a pretty good performance.  In fact, the best thing the movie has going for it is a good cast that gives fine performances.  The pairing of Brando and Brenner is worth the watch although neither had the movie at the top of their resume.  (I found it sad to watch Brenner smoking.  He died of lung cancer and before he passed, he made an anti-cigarette commercial.)  The characters in the movie are intriguing.  Esther stands out in spite of her being included to get a reference to the Holocaust into the film.  The movie avoids most cliches, but it does have the Cold War trope of a good German (Mueller) versus an evil Nazi (Kruse). 

            The movie is entertaining mainly due to the performances.  Another strength is the Oscar-nominated cinematography.  The shots of Crain meandering through the insides of the ship are impressive.  And you have to credit the screenplay with being unpredictable.  It does take a long time to get there, but it’s worth the wait. 

GRADE  =  B-

Three Days in the Life of Lt. Kravtsova (2012)

                   My latest treadmill viewing was the Amazon Prime series “Three Days in the Life of Lt. Kravtsova”.  It is four episodes totaling 184 minutes.  It comes from Star Media, the folks that brought you “Night Swallows” and “The Attackers”.  It covers three days in the life of a young officer on the Eastern Front in WWII. 

                   Lt. Kravtsova is green and this will be his first command.  On the trip to his platoon, he is informed that the average life expectancy for a lieutenant is three days.  His platoon is a motley group who are veterans.  They don’t have high hopes for their new leader.  He wants to do right and studies and memorizes his manual.  They proceed to tell him how it really works at the front.  He’s got some real learning to do and the learning curve is steep.  The platoon is manning a trench with a no man’s land of about fifty yards separating them from a German platoon.  It’s basically a live and let live situation, with occasional futile attacks.  Kravtsova is told to stay low because snipers only shoot at officers.  The men are skeptical of his leadership and when he leads an attack at first few follow him.  However, he is brave, if naïve, and gradually earns their respect.  Kravtsova is caught between the platoon and his superiors.  He has to follow orders from men who are clueless about the actual situation at the front.  When a major comes visit, he orders the sniping of a German getting water from a stream in no man’s land.  He is told this will break an unwritten rule, but cares not.  Meanwhile, romance is brewing between Kravtsova and a local farm girl.  This is building toward a suicide mission to take out a forward observation post.  The mission happens on the third day.

                   “Three Days…” is a typical Star Media production.  It has a low budget feel to it.  The trench set is fine, but small scale.  No man’s land looks like a field and the village looks like a village that was available for cheap.  The uniforms and weapons appear authentic.  The acting is actually better than you could hope for.  Alex Sparrow is well cast as Kravtsova.  He is a rising star in Russian television and music.  Kravtsova is naïve, but sincere, and he grows in the job.  His wooing of the girl (who is no beauty) is refreshingly chaste.  The platoon members have distinct personalities and you do care about their fates.  As is true for Russian WWII television series, the officer class is portrayed as mostly competent and empathetic toward the soldiers.  There is always a villain, however.

                   The weakness of the series is the confused nature of the combat.  Most of the tactics make no sense.  For instance, once they find out where the observation post is, it would have made more sense to bombard it (which they eventually do) rather than sending a squad.  The combat is visceral and one no man’s land confrontation is combat porn.  At least with the action scenes, you don’t have to rely on the subtitles.  Star Media is notorious for its sometimes laughable subtitling, but this series is the worst I’ve seen.  Plus, I often could not read them because they were set against a light background.  And often you would have to be a speed-reader to keep up.

                   In conclusion, I would recommend it for bingeing if you don’t require top flight entertainment.  It is short and the main character is appealing.  Just learn Russian first.

GRADE  =  C