I had been waiting for this
movie for a couple of years. I heard
about it early because they filmed on the USS Kidd which is a floating museum
in Baton Rouge, La. I have been on the
ship numerous times and have even slept on board several times. Those overnites were with my History
Club. It was always a great experience,
other than worrying about what those teenagers might be getting into. Sleeping in a berth on a warship is something every
war movie fan should have on their bucket list.
It took longer to see the film
than I anticipated. It’s release was
delayed by the pandemic and the studio ended up deciding to junk the theatrical
opening and go straight to streaming. It
just so happened that the new Apple + TV was hoping to get attention in the
crowded streaming market and it bought the film for $70 million (the movie cost
$50 million). I bet Apple is praying
people like me go beyond the free trial.
The movie was directed by Aaron Schneider (his second feature film), but
I would guess he deferred to star Tom Hanks.
Hanks wrote the screenplay based on the novel The Good Shepherd
by C.S. Forester.
The movie opens with some quotes
from Churchill and FDR to set the stage.
The U.S. Navy is helping escort troop and supply ships across the Atlantic. The convoys are most vulnerable when they are
transiting the “Black Pit” which refers to the area in the North Atlantic where
there is no air cover. The USS Keeling (code-named Greyhound)
leads a group of four destroyers that are escorting a 37-ship convoy to Liverpool. Commander Krausse (Hanks) is new to the ship
and this will be his first escort mission.
The movie jumps straight into the “Black Pit” and it does not take long
for things to heat up. For the next two
days, it will be a cat and mouse game with a wolfpack of German u-boats. The Keeling is in the thick of the fight and by
the time it reaches air cover again it will run the gamut of experiences a destroyer
might have in the Battle of the Atlantic.
There is a thriving subgenre of
submarine movies, but few movies from above the surface. “Greyhound” differs from the similar “The Enemy Below” because it focuses just on the destroyer. In fact, other than a flashback to Krause proposing
to his girlfriend (Elisabeth Shue) which seemed to be thrown in to get a female
on the poster, the movie takes place only on the Keeling. Clocking in at a tidy 91 minutes, the movie
eschews character development in favor of almost nonstop action. Even Krausse is a cipher, although we learn
he is religious and a cool customer. It
may be his first escort mission, but he knows his craft. The movie does not have time for the usual clichés. The crew does not side eye their new
captain. He does not have to earn their
respect. There is a brief head-scratching
moment, but it quickly turns out that Krausse is a u-boat killer. There is no dysfunction as Krausse’s exec Lt.
Commander Cole (the reliable Stephen Graham) is loyal and competent. In fact, the whole crew performs well. Hanks’ screenplay makes a point of sub-plotting
an African-American messmate, but there is little time to develop anyone. Hanks and the Greyhound dominate.
In lieu of character
development, the movie concentrates on action.
It helps if you are knowledgeable about WWII submarine warfare and
nautical terminology. The dialogue is
heavy on jargon and is not dumbed down for a mass audience. Kudos to screenwriter Hanks for doing his
research. I had to do a lot of
translating for my wife (ex. starboard is right and port is left). Hanks throws in some cryptic quotes, but the
most creative dialogue comes from a u-boat captain that taunts Krausse. It’s a bit cheesy and unrealistic, but fun
and reminiscent of an earlier style of war movie and adds that “USA! USA!” emotion. The action is a buffet as we see a variety of
combat, but if you know anything about the ferocity of wolfpack attacks, the movie
does not steer into outrageous. It all
could have happened, just not to one destroyer on one mission. Hey, it’s a movie.
The CGI is not a problem. I was not distracted by it. It helps that a real Fletcher-class destroyer was used for the interiors and exteriors. Actually, the CGI was mainly used to create the horrific North Atlantic climate conditions the convoys had to battle. This was no pleasure cruise, u-boats or not. Besides giving the recliner-sailing audience a feel for the conditions, the movie is an excellent tutorial on anti-submarine tactics. And a nice homage to the men who risked their lives escorting convoys. I hope some of the veterans of WWII tin cans get to see it in the museum theater at the USS Kidd memorial. By the way, the Royal Navy gets its due and there should be no complaining like with “U-571”.
The CGI is not a problem. I was not distracted by it. It helps that a real Fletcher-class destroyer was used for the interiors and exteriors. Actually, the CGI was mainly used to create the horrific North Atlantic climate conditions the convoys had to battle. This was no pleasure cruise, u-boats or not. Besides giving the recliner-sailing audience a feel for the conditions, the movie is an excellent tutorial on anti-submarine tactics. And a nice homage to the men who risked their lives escorting convoys. I hope some of the veterans of WWII tin cans get to see it in the museum theater at the USS Kidd memorial. By the way, the Royal Navy gets its due and there should be no complaining like with “U-571”.
The year 2020 really sucks, but
it has actually been a pretty good year for war movies. Just in the last week I have seen “The Outpost”
and this movie. And I didn’t have to go
to a theater. Same could be said for the
excellent “Danger Close” and the better-than-expected “Da 5 Bloods”. “Greyhound” is only the third best of that
quartet, but it is still a must-see for war movie fans. This movie has no frills. It
probably should have been longer to allow for fleshing out of the characters,
but it is refreshing to see a movie that concentrates on the warfare aspect of
a war movie without going the combat porn route. Get that free trial. Plus Apple TV + has some other good war
movies you can watch in a week.
GRADE = A
Nice review Sir Kevin.
ReplyDeleteI very much enjoy your comments.
Eddie
Cheers, good watch.
ReplyDeleteI only recently discovered your blog and VERY much enjoy reading your reviews, especially the ones covering more obscure films. I hope "Strategic Air Command" is coming! :)
ReplyDeleteI basically loved this movie for its purity as a war film. For example, no pointless sex randomly thrown in, as in "Braveheart" and the otherwise-excellent "Band of Brothers". But there was one detail that bothered me slightly. All of the surfaced U-boats are depicted with no one on the conning tower bridge (except during the deck gun battle). Perhaps I just missed this detail on the "small screen"? My understanding of U-boat operations is that a U-boat would NEVER be on the surface without at least a watch on deck, even in the harshest weather. And in engagements like these, surely the captain would be up on the bridge most of the time?
That is a good catch! You are right. Surfaced u-boats would have had several crew members on the bridge, as you see in "Das Boot", no matter the weather. If I had to guess, I would say the film decided the CGI people were distracting.
DeleteBy the way, if you enjoy this blog, you might want to consider joining my War Movie Lovers group on Facebook.
DeleteI just watched this. It’s pretty good. The scenes with Gray Wolf (The taunting U-boat voice) calling Greyhound were the only minor gripe I had, not because it’s probably unlikely to that to occur but it seemed too dramatic, particularly with the howling. :)
ReplyDelete