“Born on the 4th of July” is the second in Oliver Stone’s Vietnam trilogy. It was released in 1989. It is sandwiched between “Platoon” and “Heaven and Earth”. The film shares eleven actors with “Platoon”. It is based on the memoir by Ron Kovic who wrote the script with Stone. (Kovic has a cameo in the film, he is one of the wheelchair vets in the parade.) Interestingly, the two veterans both won Bronze Stars and Purple Hearts. Stone also produced and directed the film. It was a huge success at the box office and with critics. It won Oscars for Director and Film Editing. It was nominated for Best Picture (losing to “Driving Miss Daisy!!!), Best Actor (Cruise lost to Daniel Day-Lewis in “My Left Foot”), Adapted Screenplay (losing to “Driving Miss Daisy”!!!), Cinematography (losing to “Glory”), and Original Score by John Williams (losing to “The Little Mermaid”). It won Golden Globes for Picture, Director, Actor, and Screenplay. The budget was only $18 million. Both Cruise and Stone worked below their usual salaries, but got a percentage of the profits. This paid off because the movie made $161 million.
The movie opens symbolically with a young Kovic playing war – an American rite of passage. This flows into a 4th of July parade featuring crippled veterans (including the real Kovic). The crowd is very appreciative of the WWII veterans. Next, we hear JFK urge young Americans to “Ask not…” This trio of images establishes the template of pre-disillussioned America. (Interestingly, the Kennedy of this film is urging young American boys to go to Vietnam whereas the Kennedy of Stone's "JFK" is killed for wanting us out!)
Kovic is recruited by the Marines and seduced by the desire to “find out if you got what it takes.” He doesn’t want to miss the chance to go toe to toe with Communism. In a twist, his veteran father (Raymond Barry) is not thrilled, but his mother (Caroline Kava) is supportive.
The movie jumps forward to Kovic’s second tour in Vietnam. His unit is attacking a village and find a whole family slaughtered. The combat is visceral and graphic. In the chaotic retreat, Kovic accidentally kills one of his men. When he tries to accept responsibility, his CO brushes the incident under the rug. This adds to Kovic’s anguish and creates an ominous vibe. Sure enough, in the next combat set piece, Kovic is badly wounded in the assault on another ville. The action is intense and frenetic. Both scenes evidence the “fog of war”. Tragically, the military hospital is more hellish. He is given last rites, but survives to end up in the Bronx Veterans’ Hospital.
The hospital is like Purgatory. Viewers eyes are opened to how our warriors were treated by the system they fought for. Rats, filth, uncaring staff, drug abuse, faulty equipment. (This makes it even more damning that some similar examples of mistreatment greeted veterans of Iraq!) In spite of this, Kovic remains a hawk and rails against anti-war protestors. “Love it or leave it!”
By the time he is well enough to go home, Kovic has slid into depression. His mother can’t handle her golden boy who is now a broken man. She’s a hawk and he is becoming increasingly dovish. The dysfunction causes him to leave and he ends up in a seedy town in Mexico which is home to other mentally and physically scarred veterans. He has to hit rock bottom before he can become a functional human being. In the process of mentally healing, he comes full circle to the anti-war movement. He becomes one of the most famous voices against the war and for better treatment of veterans.
ACTING: A+
ACTION: N/A
ACCURACY: B
PLOT: B
REALISM: A+
CINEMATOGRAPHY: A
SCORE: A
SCENE: the wheelchair fight
QUOTE: Kovic:
It's my leg! I want my leg, you understand? Can't you understand that?
All's I'm sayin' is that I want to be treated like a human being! I fought for
my country! I am a Vietnam veteran! I fought for my country!
Here’s a cliché for you; “I’m not a big Tom Cruise (Oliver Stone) fan, but…” How often do you hear that? This is one of those movies where both men are at their best. It is a very impressive movie. There are few weaknesses. Stone controls himself (you know how he can be) and deserved the Oscar as Best Director. It is astounding that the movie lost to “Driving Miss Daisy”. You can definitely argue this was more egregious than the infamous “Shakespeare in Love” win over “Saving Private Ryan”. The cinematography of Robert Richardson mixes chromes to match the moods. For instance, the combat scenes have reddish tinge. The two combat scenes stand out for me, of course. Richardson uses a hand-held and gets the you-are-there feel that has become common in modern war films.
In less capable hands, the movie could have been maudlin and heavy-handed. Stone is obviously sending a message, but he does not bludgeon us with it. One theme is that the war was a big mistake that wounded America. Stone also makes it clear that veterans were treated poorly, especially wounded vets. There have been other Vietnam War movies that have concentrated on PTSD, but few that have focused on wounded vets and their maltreatment by Veterans Hospitals. Another theme is that war is not what you expect. “Born on the Fourth of July” reminds of Paul Baumer’s journey from patriotic German enlistee to disillusioned soldier in “All Quiet on the Western Front”. It is important to note that Kovic is not a fictional character. The movie is acceptably accurate, but there is some historical license. (see below)
Although Stone struck out with “Heaven and Earth”, the first two in his trilogy are important films. “Platoon” has lost luster for many war movie fans (not me), but the fact is that it opened the Vietnam combat experience to many Americans. It is not the only Vietnam film that has done a credible job in this area. On the other hand, “Born” opened people’s eyes to the plight of wounded veterans. This depiction is rarer with the inferior “Coming Home” the obvious competitor. The sad thing is the limited impact it had on treatment of future veterans. It also should be mentioned that the movie did the service of bringing Ron Kovic to public recognition. For the Vietnam War, it is appropriate that we get a crippled, but resilient hero to replace Col. Kirby of “The Green Berets” (a movie that is the polar opposite of this movie).
HISTORICAL ACCURACY: He did enlist after Marine recruiters talked to his class. His mother was supportive and his father was lukewarm. The combat at the first village was accurate with the civilian deaths and the friendly fire, but it was actually two separate incidents. His commander did try to brush the friendly fire incident under the rug. Kovic did not visit Wilson’s parents. He apologized in his memoir. Kovic’s wounding is accurately depicted. He was given last rites. Unfortunately, the stay in the hospital is true. Treatment of wounded veterans was egregious. He did try to walk again, but the broken leg was later, when he was in college. There is no Donna mentioned in his memoir. He did ride in the parade, but he did not give a speech. The peace rally at Syracuse University was Hollywood. (Stone later apologized to the Syracuse police department.) He was involved in a rally in Washington which the police broke up. He was not assaulted. In his memoir, this is the moment that turned him into an activist. The stay in Mexico was well done. He drank and slept with prostitutes, but in his memoir he does not write about falling in love with one. He did have a fight with Charlie while in their wheelchairs. His anti-war protesting is accurately portrayed, but his interview at the Republican convention was before Nixon’s speech. He did speak at the next Democratic Convention. (The studio was not impressed with the scene and allowed Stone to reshoot it with 6,000 extras instead of 600. It cost $500,000.)
All things considered, "Born on the Fourth of July" is admirably accurate. Some of the inaccuracies are designed to advance the themes and since Kovic had a hand in the production, we can assume he was okay with the liberties Stone took. Of course, this does not excuse inventing a character like Donna or a trip to Wilson’s parents. It is more acceptable to combine some incidents for time and plot purposes. The biggest strength of the movie accuracy-wise is Cruise's portrayal of Kovic. The Kovic of the memoir is the Kovic of the film. Cruise channels Kovic and the extreme emotions Kovic writes about in his book are apparent in the film.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please fell free to comment. I would love to hear what you think and will respond.