Showing posts with label Hannibal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hannibal. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 20, 2025

DUELING MOVIES: The Giant of Marathon (1959) / Jupiter’s Darling (1955)

 

 

               “The Giant of Marathon” is an Italian “sword and sandals” (peplum) film. It was directed by Jacquest Tourneur who was famous for his “stylish and atmospheric” films. He did a lot of B-movie horror films, the best being “Cat People”. He also dabbled in film noir including the classic “Out of the Past”. Some scenes had to be reshot by director Mario Brava because some extras were smoking cigarettes in the background of scenes. The movie was a success at the box office.

               An opening title card tells us Greece is divided between Sparta and Athens. Athens is roiled by “internal conflict and treachery”. Bad timing because Persian Emperor Darius has his sights set on Athens. Luckily, there is a hero available. We meet Phillipides (Steve Reeves) as he dominates at the Olympic games. He returns to Athens and is put in command of the Sacred Guard. He is in charge of the defense of the city. He gets involved in a love triangle. Andromeda (Mylene Demongeol) is betrothed to the treason-minded Theocritus (Sergio Fantoni). He and Andromeda’s father are fans of the ousted tyrant Hippias. They hope to enlist Phillipides in their plot to help Hippias return to power. Theocritus sicks a femme fatale named Charis (Daniela Rocca) to seduce him. She falls in love with him. Who wouldn’t? Now we have a love rectangle. All of this is just killing time to the great battle. The Persians land outside Athens. Phillipides is sent to Sparta on a horse to get their help. (The real Phillipides ran, but Reeves is too muscle-bound to do that).

               Here’s how the famous battle is depicted (the italic stuff is accurate):  The Persians bring their horses ashore on rafts. They bring a giant drum with them. They catapult a skull at the Greek army to indicate it’s battle time. They march forward led by five horsemen, each leading a column. When the Persian cavalry attacks, it is met by arrows. The Greeks have leaf-shaped spear heads and rectangular metal shields. The Persians have odd -shaped metal shields. Miltiades orders his army forward from horse-back. The Persian horses run into the Greek shield wall. They are followed by chariots. The Greeks have set ditches as traps. The surviving chariots run into the shield wall. A chaotic melee results with the Greeks using swords. Phillipides arrives with Spartan reinforcements. Militiades sends in his reserves. Phillipides fights from a horse. He and others roll boulders down on the Persians. The battle ends before the Spartans can fight in it. The Greeks win. (Note how accurate the battle is.)

               In reality, the defeat at Marathon caused Darius to return home, but the movie is not done yet. The Persian fleet sails to Athens so the movie can provide a similarly laughable rendering of the Battle of Salamis. It is actually more hilarious, but I’ll let you decide for yourself. I will warn you that if you thought the naval battle in the Colosseum in Gladiator 2 was ridiculous, it does not hold a candle to this scene. Spoiler alert: the Greeks win this battle too and Phillipides is the main reason. His duel with Theocritus is hilarious.

               Needless to say, you should not get your history from a sword and sandals movie, but even by that subgenres low standards, this movie gets almost everything wrong. And it’s not like there aren’t plenty of books about the Battles of Marathon and Salamis. The historian Herodotus is famous for his love of a good story even if it was questionable, but even he would not have swallowed what this movie is depicting. But Hades, no one would watch this movie to write a term paper on the battles. The movie was meant to be entertaining. It succeeds in that if you are easily entertained or you are a big fan of muscle men. Reeves was a huge star in Europe, mainly because he appealed to women. The guy was an absolute hunk. There is a scene where he and other hulks swim bare-chested in tight loin-clothes. You might want to have some smelling salts nearby if you watch this movie with your wife or girlfriend. And you might want to have some protection for your ribs because Ms. Demongeol is beautiful. The actress was a huge star in France and a sex symbol in the 1950s and 1960s. Her career spanned seven decades and over 100 movies.

The movie is unpredictable because it is so inaccurate. I had no idea what was going to happen in battles that I know a lot about. (I have written a novel about Marathon and am working on one about Salamis. Trust me, this movie is not a source.) If you don’t take the movie seriously, you will get some good laughs. Some of them will come from the subtitles. I watched it on Tubi. The subtitles had a hard time with the names of characters. Andromeda was spelled “Ramadan”, for instance.

               “Jupiter’s Darling” is an American movie that could be described as an historical musical comedy. It was based on Robert Sherwood’s play “The Road to Rome” (1927). MGM made the dubious decision to make the movie as an Esther Williams picture. Williams had been a big star famous for swimming in her movies, but her career was waning at this point. It ended up as one of only two flops she made for the studio. It was not her fault because the concept was flawed from the beginning. The shoot was a difficult one for the actress who was coming off a pregnancy. She punctured an eardrum (for the fifth time) and had to limit her swimming. A body double was used . It could have been worse. She refused to film a scene where she jumps off a cliff on a horse. A stuntman volunteered to do it and broke his back. Her co-star was Howard Keel who was a big star in musicals. He had made several movies with Williams. George Sidney (“Anchors Aweigh”) directed and went over budget so much (painted elephants were very expensive) that the tepid box office resulted in a huge bomb.

               The movie features several historical characters, led by Hannibal (Keel). It is 216 B.C. Hannibal is the barbarian at the gates. Rome appoints a dictator named Fabius Maximus (George Sander). His fiancĂ© is the feisty Amytis (Williams). It does not take long for her to hit the pool. Hunky statues swim with her and cute baby Cupids. Welcome to the first choreographed swimming scene in a war movie. Meanwhile, Hannibal is on the march with his elephants. He sings with his men. Amytis and her slave girl go to spy on him and are captured. Their relationship begins rockily as in every romance movie ever made. We get the clicheish love triangle. Don’t bother guessing who Amytis ends up with. If you can’t wait to find out, don’t go to a history book. This builds up to the climactic assault on Rome. Here is how the movie depicts it (the facts are in italics): Hannibal uses smoking chariots and elephants with battering rams. The defenders use hot oil and fire ball catapults. Fabius hurls a white flag javelin, but Amytis urges him to fight (this after she had told Hannibal about a lose brick in the wall). He offers a huge amount of tribute if Hannibal desists. He doesn’t want the money, he only wants Amytis. She decides to be a patriot and go with him.

               It’s hard to believe that anyone was surprised that this movie failed. When I finished it, I asked myself “what the fuck was that?” Well, at least it is better than “Braveheart” and just as accurate. The movie has its charms. The technicolor is vibrant and the sets are extravagant. Amytis has the best swimming pool in Hollywood. Some of the songs are catchy and the actors are good singers. There are ten songs in the movie. Unfortunately, when the singing ends we are left to suffer from some truly bad acting. It should be said that as an actress, Williams was a good swimmer. The dancing is fine, especially by the elephants. If you want to see elephants wiggle their asses, this is the movie for you. It is surprising that the movie has not developed cult status. It is entertaining in a campy way. And if you know the actual history of Hannibal, it is downright hilarious. In its defense,  the film is up front about its veracity. It leads off with “The history which describes Hannibal’s attack on Romeis very confusing; this story will do nothing to clear it up.” Before you say “no shit”, it is unlikely many people who saw this in a theater knew much about Hannibal. But no one would have thought Hannibal went swimming with an upper-class Roman woman.

               So which one of these campy extravaganzas is better? It depends on whether you are a fan of “sand and sandals” or musical swimming. Both are terrible when it comes to history. I would give the edge to “Giant” because it has Steve Reeves, some dastardly villains, and two hot women. It has two set piece battles that are astounding in their total lack of connection to the actual events. Everything in “Jupiter’s Darling” is ridiculous.

GRADES  =  Giant = C  /  Jupiter’s  =  D


Sunday, January 24, 2021

HANNIBAL (1959)

 


                    I once had a student put a picture of Hannibal Lecter with their identification of the great general Hannibal.  I certainly did not teach about Hannibal the Cannibal in my Western Civilization class and I would not review a movie about him on this blog.  But “Hannibal” (1959) is a movie about one of my favorite characters in history.  I have read several books about him and although I  had no hopes for this movie, I just had to watch it so I could shake my head with a patronizing sneer.  Plus, the movie has some kitsch value in that it has the first pairing of Terence Hill and Bud Spencer.  And it stars the incomparable Victor Mature, who I have loved ever since seeing “After the Fox” as a teenager.  Mature and co-star Rita Gam were the only English-speaking actors in the film.  Supposedly, 20,000 extras were used, and some elephants.

                      “Hannibal” is an Italian peplum movie that was produced by Warner Brothers.   I am not a big fan of the “sword and sandals” genre, but here are the basics.  They thrived in Italy in the late 50’s and early 60’s.  The plots of these low budget films were usually inspired by historical, mythological, or Biblical events and characters.  Most of the historical characters came from Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome, or the Middle Ages.  The genre got a big boost with the popularity of “Ulysses” (1954), a movie I showed numerous times in my Western Civ class.  Many of the films featured heroes like Hercules and Samson.  For this reason, the main character was usually portrayed by a muscle-bound actor with little talent, like Steve Reeves.  Besides the buff hero, the plots usually involved two females dueling for his affections.  One would be a damsel in distress and the other a femme fatale.  The hero often fought against an evil ruler.  Besides the low budgets, the films were famous for their poor dubbing.  The monster effects have also produced much chuckling. 

                    “Hannibal” is not a good example of the genre.  It is more historically based than most.  However, rather than being a biopic or a movie about the Second Punic War, it is more of a love triangle set amidst some of Hannibal’s greatest hits.  It opens with Hannibal (Victor Mature) crossing the Alps.  There’s lots of trudging and it is sufficiently snowy.  Real elephants walk across a sound stage.  It’s not as silly as you would expect.  Meanwhile, Fabius Maximus (Gabriele Ferzetti) is in Rome warning the Senate not to underestimate the invader.  It’s a small world as Hannibal captures Fabius’ niece Sylvia (Rita Gam) in a chariot chase.  He shows her around camp (and who knows what off camera) and then sends her home.  The Battle of Trebia is recreated on a sound stage.  Silvia and Hannibal keep meeting to advance the romance.  This becomes awkward when Mrs. Hannibal arrives.  Thrust in this melodrama is a laughable Battle of Cannae, but we do get a soldier taking an arrow in the mouth and a severed arm (ala “Spartacus”). 

                    “Hannibal” is a terrible movie, of course.  You couldn’t expect otherwise.  But it could have been worse.  Although it is not an historical atrocity, it does toy with the facts a lot.  And considering how fascinating the true story of Hannibal is, it was stupid to make things up.  However, the chronology of events is right and it does allude to some of the more famous moments in Hannibal’s War.  For instance, we get the incident where Hannibal’s brother’s head is thrown in his camp.  Besides Hannibal, another key historical figure is Fabius Maximus.  His famous delaying tactics are not well-rendered here.  And although Hannibal had his disagreements with his cavalry commander Maharbal, it is nuts to have them dueling.  The battles are embarrassing.  There is a lot of archery by the Romans which anyone with knowledge knows was not a strength of theirs.  The battles are big, with lots of extras and horses, but the choreography is poor. 

                    The romance is not a big selling point for war movie buffs.  It is not believable and is edited so it appears choppy.  (This may be due to the chopping up of the original cut for American audiences, but I’m not going to go out of my way to see the director’s cut.)  Silvia keeps going back and forth.  It doesn’t help that we have a movie where Victor Mature is the best actor.  Hannibal deserved better and fans of his certainly deserved a better movie than this.  Supposedly, we may get one in the future, although Vin Diesel is getting a little too old to play him.  For now, watch the docudrama “Hannibal: Rome's Worst Nightmare” or “Scipio Africanus”.

 

GRADE  =  D-