Monday, April 29, 2024

100 BEST WAR MOVIES: 65. THE 317th PLATOON (1965)

                        “The 317th Platoon” is a French film set in the First Indochina War.  It is based on a novel by the director Pierre Schoendoerffer.  He was a war cameraman with the French army at Dien Bien Phu.  He won the best screenplay award at Cannes.  Two years later, he directed the documentary “The Anderson Platoon” which was the Best Documentary Feature at the Academy Awards. 

                  The film takes place in May, 1954.  A French platoon, with Laotian allies, is ordered to abandon its position and withdraw to a base miles away.  They are naïve about the trek as evidenced by their taking a refrigerator with them.  In a great action scene, they ambush a Vietminh supply convoy that is using bikes.  Afterwards, they check a wounded soldier to see if he is pissing blood. It’s little details like this that set the movie apart from the more big budget Vietnam War movies.  The convoy was a juicy target, but the ambush is a big mistake because now the unit is being chased.  The leader is Lt. Torrens (Jacques Perrin).  He believes in obeying the rules of war.  However, he is superseded by the arriving Adjutant Willsdorf (Bruno Cremer).  Willsdorf is a fascinating character.  He is a veteran from the German army in WWII.  He is a survivor who has seen defeat and feels that in a guerrilla war, there are no rules.  “In war, you must make sure your goals are worth the losses.  Otherwise you will lose.”  From this point on, the movie is a lost patrol movie.  Few of these men will survive the journey.  As Willsdorf says:  “This is not a stroll.”  It sure ain’t.

ACTING:                      B

ACTION:                      B  6/10

ACCURACY:               N/A 

PLOT:                          A

REALISM:                   A+

CINEMATOGRAPHY:    A

SCORE:                        sparse

BEST SCENE:  the ambush

 

BEST QUOTE: Willsdorf:  “In war, you must make sure your goals are worth the losses.  Otherwise you will lose.”   

                  “The 317th Platoon” is a classic that is hard to find, but its worth the effort.  It has been compared to “The Battle of Algiers” because of its documentary feel.  It also has a cast of mostly nonprofessionals, although Perrin and Cremer are acclaimed in France.  The cast is excellent with no scene-chewing.  The movie is dominated by the Torrens/Willsdorf dynamic.  Each represents a different take on the war.  They remind me a bit of Elias/Barnes in “Platoon”.  Torrens reflects the American view of fighting in Vietnam (at least in the early years) and Willsdorf represents the French view circa Dien Bien Phu. Torrens is idealistic, and Willsdorf is cynical.  Their philosophies don’t match, but they manage to lead well despite their differences.  Willsdorf plants a grenade under a body while Torrens sniffs.  Torrens will risk lives to save the wounded, Willsdorf goes back to salvage a machine gun, but leaves the wounded behind.  After a bloody ambush, Torrens is disgusted, to which Willsdorf responds:  “No, it’s not disgusting.  It’s war”.  I have to admit that although I don’t necessarily agree with him, Willsdorf is one of my favorite war movie characters.

                  Another movie it reminds of is “84 Charlie MoPic”.  The cinematography is intimate, for the most part.  An ambush at a waterfall is filmed by a stationary camera at the top of the waterfall.  There is no music, but outstanding sound effects.  In fact, the soundtrack is used sparingly.  The movie puts you with the unit.  There are lots of close-ups.  You get a feel for the last days of a losing effort.  This is war without the frills.  Thus, it is realistic.  The soldiers are just doing their jobs.  The dialogue is realistically spare.  Nobody gives a speech.  A great war movie gets us to empathize with the men without having to undergo the hardships they went through.  The soldiers of the platoon know fear, bravado, stress, dissension, and exhaustion.  Few movies have done a better job of showing the effects of exhaustion on soldiers.  They deal with dysentery (which you rarely see in war movies).  Torrens makes mistakes due to tiredness.  Mistakes even a good commander might make.  The enemy are not demonized and are faceless.  It is implied they commit atrocities, but the movie concentrates on the way the war has corrupted the French.

                  “The 317th Platoon” should have been required viewing at the Pentagon when it came out.  Since many of our leaders did not bother to read about the French experience in Vietnam, perhaps they would have sat down and watched a movie about it.  Just as they should have watched “The Battle of Algiers”.  You should watch it too.  It is one of the best Vietnam War movies.  Pair it up with “The Anderson Platoon” and then watch “Go Tell the Spartans”.  Your cinematic tutorial on the war has begun.

 

Sunday, April 28, 2024

The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare (2024)

 


                “The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare” was directed by Guy Ritchie (“The Covenant). It is based on the book “The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare:  How Churchill’s Secret Warriors Set Europe Ablaze and Gave Birth to Modern Black Ops” by Damien Lewis. The film touts itself as the true story of a secret mission in WWII. It fits into the subgenre of commando movies.

                The opening set piece is straight out of “Guns of Navarone”.  It’s our first clue that the movie will be treading on familiar ground. Gus March-Phillips (Henry Cavill) and three of his team are on a fishing boat that is stopped by a German destroyer. Within five minutes we are treated to the killing of a despicable Nazi and his entire crew and ship. They never stood a chance. But we knew that. Some time later, March-Phillips is let out of military prison to lead a secret mission that will win the war. The mission takes place in late 1941. Great Britain is barely hanging on because u-boat attacks are sinking cargo ships and will be a threat to troop transports once the U.S. gets into the war. Gen. Gubbins (Cary Elwes) and Ian Fleming (Freddie Fox) have concocted a plan that has gotten the approval of Churchill (Rory Kinnear).  It is going to be off the books. Naturally, March-Phillips wants his own team of misfits.  They are so good, he does not need a dozen of them. Fleming’s plan is to destroy a supply ship that is essential to the continuance of u-boat attacks. Sink the ship and the u-boats will die of starvation, so to speak. The target is in a port off the coast of central Africa. They will sail to the site and along the way, break a comrade out of Gestapo custody. 60 dead Germans later, they are now five. Meanwhile, the duo of Richard Heron (Babs Olusanmokun) and Marjorie Stewart (Elza Gonzalez) will go undercover in the port. Marjorie is tasked with seducing the SS commander (Tigh Schweiger). They enlist the local kingpin, who brings his best men to the party.  Speaking of which, the plan involves distracting the Germans with a costume party for the officers and a beer fest for the enlisted. If you already know that things will not go as planned, then you have seen a few movies in the subgenre.

                It just so happens that this week I have been discussing combat porn in my Facebook group. I defined it as over the top bloodshed that results in a high body count. Sometimes a movie kills a lot of bad guys, but in a realistic way. An example would be “Kingdom of Heaven” which has the highest body count of any war movie. The deaths are not cartoonish and meant to slake the blood lust of a certain segment of war movie lovers. And then we have movies like “The Siege of Firebase Gloria” that revel in graphic violence. The movie that “Ministry” is most reminiscent of in this respect is “Where Eagles Dare”. Both have a lot of Germans as machine gun fodder and not a one German was able to kill a good guy, or gal. In the prison breakout scene, the quartet go in with no plan and in broad daylight. They kill at least 60 Germans and not a single one fires a shot at them! Did I mention the movie is based on a true story? This is just a taste of what is to come. It was hard to keep count, but I would estimate that over 90 Germans are killed in the film. Since it is partly a comedy, you can smile at the over the top mayhem. And you might laugh when reminded that this is supposedly a true story. (More on that later.)

                The movie is well-made. Ritchie is famous for his style that is similar to Quentin Tarantino. Colorful characters and quick cuts.  Naturally, viewers might compare it to “Inglourious Basterds”. It’s not as flamboyant as that feature, but it has a similar wit to it. In fact, it is similar to many movies. The commando raid subgenre is rife with cliches. The motley band of skilled killers. The time-line has to be moved up. The situation changes at the last minute. There is a wily, evil Nazi. A kick-ass female. Lots of explosions. The bad guys pass up using their guns in order to be dispatched in hand-to-hand combat. No bad guy is just wounded, they all are killed. The mission is crucial to winning the war.

                The silliness is dissipated a bit by the fine cast. Cavill is dashing as the rogue leader and the rest of his team get their chance to shine.  One of them uses a bow and arrow to silently slay. He also collects human hearts. Hilarious! Each man has a particular skill. They all share the skill of killing Germans. The second track is Richard and Marjorie laying the groundwork on shore. This is the spy part of the tale. Elza Gonzalez is a stand-out as the hot secret agent that is imperturbable and capable of outwitting a sly Nazi. She gets to dress as Cleopatra and sing a song. The movie deserves credit for casting two African-Americans in key roles.

                When I saw commercials for the film and it was proclaimed to be a true story, I had to chuckle. I immediately thought of “Fargo”.  I looked forward to seeing how far from the truth the movie strayed. I have to admit the movie was more accurate than I thought it would be. That does not mean that it is a good history lesson, but the movie does build a mighty oak out of a real acorn. Given the slight effort to base the screenplay on the book, I feel I can recommend the movie as an entertaining piece of action/thriller with acceptable flights of fantasy. It is in the upper echelon of combat porn films and a rare “based on a true story” bloodbath. Ironically, one of the biggest liberties it takes with the actual story has to do with the body count. There was no count in the actual mission.  But this would not be a Guy Ritchie film if you didn’t leave the theater with blood splatters.

GRADE  =  B-

HISTORICAL ACCURACY:  In 1940, Churchill urged the creation of the Special Operations Executive (SOE) to conduct missions behind enemy lines. In 1941, a smaller unit called the Small Scale Raiding Force (SSRF), also known as No. 6 Commando, was created for black ops. (How black? The file on this mission was not released until 2016.)   It consisted of just 55 members. It was commanded by Maj. Gus March-Phillips, who was described as not as charming as the character in the movie, but was a daring leader and did not mind using violence. The unit was tasked with small raids to inflict pain on the Axis.  Operation Postmaster was its first mission. March-Phillips left Great Britain on August 9, 1941 on board the unit’s trawler Maid of Honor. Do I need to tell you that the boat was not stopped by a German destroyer resulting in massacre of the Germans? The original mission was to scout rivers in west Africa where it had been reported German u-boats were refueling. They discovered nothing, but then got information about three ships that were aiding the German war effort.  They were located in a port on the Spanish island of Fernando Po. The ships were carrying arms and ammunition for German forces. The cargo was not specifically associated with u-boats.

 A plan was suggested by an SOE agent in the area, not by Ian Fleming. It called for the taking of the three vessels. One was a merchant ship named the Duchessa d’Aosta.  The others were a tug and a barge. The commandos would use two tugs to enter the harbor and tow away the three ships. March-Phillips was in command of 4 SOE agents, 11 SSRF commandos, and some locals to crew the tugs. Because Spain was neutral it was to be a top secret mission with built in deniability. Despite that, the British general in command of West Africa refused to support the mission and the Admiralty, which had given the green light, had qualms and put a stop to it. The fear was the reaction of Spain to what could be described as piracy. However, the Foreign Office eventually stepped in and got the mission approved. An SOE agent named Richard Lippett (Heron was based on him) was undercover at the port and he arranged for a dinner party for the German officers the night of the raid.

On the night of Jan. 14, 1942, the two tugs entered the harbor with no difficulty. March-Phillips and his second-in-command Capt. Appleyard led a group in boarding the Duchessa. Private Anders Lassen was first aboard, but there was no killing to be done. Other men boarded the tug and the barge. Explosive charges were used to cut the anchor chains. The explosions were the first warning that something was up, but the Germans were completely confused. The only shots fired were by anti-aircraft guns thinking planes were attacking. The three ships were towed out of the harbor and the mission was over in 30 minutes. There were no casualties for either side. 29 prisoners were taken.  The Spanish government did pitch a fit, but eventually it got over it. The post script before the credits is accurate about the awards given to the principal members of the mission. What was not mentioned was all the historical characters in the movie that participated in the mission died before the end of the war.

                As far as the characters, some were real and others were not. Gen. Dubbins did use the codename M and was the inspiration for Ian Fleming’s character in this James Bond novels. Dubbins did not become head of the SOE until after the mission. Ian Fleming was a naval officer attached to the SOE. He did have a hand in the plan. He did use March-Phillips as inspiration for James Bond. (The movie gives a cute nod to that by having Fleming introduce himself as “Fleming, Ian Fleming”.) Churchill did take an interest in special operations, but he was not as hands on for this mission as the movie implies. March-Phillips was not let out of jail and he did not have to put together a team. He was already in command of SSRF. Appleyard was his second-in-command, but he did not need rescuing from Gestapo custody. Sorry, the attack on the prison did not happen. I can assure you that they did not kill 60 Germans with not one bullet fired at them. I can’t believe I’m having to tell you this. There was a Private Lassen, but I found no evidence that he was proficient in bows, knives, and axes. If he was, he did not get the chance to show it in Operation Postmaster. There was a Graham Hayes on the mission, but there was no explosives expert named Alvarez.  There was a Marjorie Stewart, but she was a secretary with the SOE and certainly did not participate in the mission. She did marry March-Phillips and gave birth to a daughter after she became a widow. I was surprised to learn that the movie was accurate in having all members of the mission survive. The movie does not copy “The Dirty Dozen” in that respect.  

                The movie is part comedy, but I fear most members of the audience probably don’t get the best jokes in it. I am referring to the way the movie builds up the mission as a crucial mission that might save Great Britain. The idea that one cargo ship was the sole supplier of the u-boat fleet is ludicrous. As is the notion that Parliament would have removed Churchill if the mission created an international incident! Another howler was the Germans up-armoring the cargo ship which meant they would not be able to sink it.