VS.
SPOILER ALERT: This blog
post is a comparison of the movie and the book and is mainly aimed at people
who have already read the book.
The acclaimed military science
fiction novel Ender’s Game has been brought to the big screen by
director Gavin Hood. Hood also wrote the
screenplay based on the book by Orson Scott Card. The novel is beloved and there has been much
trepidation about the movie adaptation.
I have read the book and I am concerned here with my theory that a movie
should end up better than the novel it is based on. I am familiar with the belief that movies seldom
match their source, especially when we are talking about classic novels. I swim upstream when it comes to this
parroted philosophy. Does “Ender’s Game”
support the majority view or mine?
For those unfamiliar with the
novel’s plot, Ender Wiggin is a young boy who is a prodigy when it comes to
military strategy and tactics. He is
groomed through tough love to become a fleet commander to lead Earth in the
upcoming sequel to Earth versus the alien would-be conquerors.
The movie briefly backgrounds
the previous war in which the Borg-like Formics (the “Buggers” of the book)
almost wiped out Earth. Only the amazing
performance by a Mazer Rackham saved the human race. 50 years later Earth is preparing a
pre-emptive attack on the Formic planet.
Ender (Asa Butterfield) is taken from his parents to Battle School which
is located in outer space. The commander
of battle school Col. Graff (Harrison Ford) feels Ender is “the one” and takes
steps to harden him for command. Ender
makes friends and enemies among the cadets and quickly proves a natural in the
Battle Room where the low gravity environment makes for interesting
competitions and great special effects.
The movie does as good a job as could be expected in recreating the
environment, but the competitions are pale reenactments of the vibrant book
scenes. Ender is the Battle School’s
star pupil until his encounter with a jealous older boy causes him to drop
out. Graff uses Ender’s sister Valentine
(Abigail Breslin) to convince him mankind needs him.
Ender is taken by Graff to a
secret outpost where he is introduced to the legendary Rackham (Ben Kingsley)
and reunited with his best mates from Battle School. They are told they are going to go through
simulations of commanding the fleet assaulting the Formic planet. Each simulation involves Ender directing his
comrades as each controls a different part of the fleet. This leads up to “graduation day”.
The movie is not substantially
different from the novel. The main
difference is what is left out, basically for time reasons. The film jettisons the subplots of Valentine
and Peter (Ender’s psychopath older brother) in their political guises as
Demosthenes and Locke. This is an
improvement as that part of the book struck me as being highly unrealistic and
mostly filler. The movie also makes no
reference at all to the situation on Earth.
In the book, Card makes the questionable decision to liken Earth in the
distant future to Cold War Earth (even using the term Warsaw Pact). This allows for the dubious inclusion of an
Earthbound conflict that the movie thankfully avoids.
The movie hits the highlights of
Ender’s rise to commander status, but naturally cannot go into the details that
were one of the highlights of the book.
The movie only hints at the struggles Ender has to go through in
overcoming obstacles placed in front of him by Graff. In order to compact the time frame (possibly
for purposes of using only one actor to portray Ender), we get a much quicker
progression in the Battle School. The
movie is particularly weak in depicting how Ender’s outside the box tactics
were the keys to his success. In fact,
he wins his last match using a conventional formation which essentially dilutes
what little effort the movie had made to hint at why he was brilliant. There is also much less character development
among the core group with Petra (Hailee Steinfeld) being bumped up to BFF (not
surprisingly). Bean, Alai, Dink, and
Bernard are there only to bring back fond memories for fans of the book.
The other highlight of the book (the
“mind game”) is given a prominent role
and benefits from video game style graphics that should go over well with the
core audience. The movie places the
emphasis on how the game got out of the control of Graff whereas in the book
the emphasis was more on Ender’s problem solving abilities. More would have been better, but again time
constraints played a role in limiting these forays into Ender’s mind. The scenes do play a pivotal role in setting
up the ending of the movie.
The biggest strength of the
movie is pushing the theme that the war may have been unnecessary and was
blatant genocide. The movie downplays
the evilness of the Formics (witness the omission of the term “buggers”). Ender is more torn up by what he has done
than in the book. The movie also is able
to be more visceral in portraying the sacrifices Ender has to call for from his
fleet during the simulations. The post
script is simplified in a more satisfying way than in the book.
Is the movie better than the
book? In advancing the overarching theme
that Ender was being used by the military to preemptively destroy an alien
species that perhaps was not deserving of extinction, the movie is more
efficient than the book. The excision
of the subplots streamlines the plot, but the slimming down of Ender’s Battle
School experience keeps the movie’s length under control at the expense of the
most memorable moments and characters.
In conclusion, the novel is on
the Marine Corps’ recommended reading list.
It is highly unlikely the movie will be recommended viewing. What this means is that if you prefer a plot
that deals mainly with the stresses of command with a heavy dose of strategy
and tactics, you would probably prefer the novel. The movie is more a synopsis of the book –
hitting the high spots without diving in too deep. The film concentrates more on the moral
dimensions of the war. While the book
erred in going into too much detail on periphery plots, the movie does not go
into enough detail on the cherished elements of the book. Is the movie better? I would give it a slight nod, but it is not
as clear a victory as for “Starship Troopers” the movie.
P.S. If you have not read the book, I strongly
recommend you read it before watching the movie. But be sure you stop reading the book before
you get to the graduation simulation.
I'm facing a bit of a dilemma now. I wanted to read your post but also meant to read the book and watch the movie. Sorry.
ReplyDeleteUnderstood. Read only the post script.
Delete"Happy" Veterans/Remembrance/Armistice Day to all.
ReplyDeleteDitto.
DeleteOne thing I like about Card as an author is his ability to give his characters different but fleshed out ideologies. Too many writers surround their main characters with straw men, either because it "helps" the main character's case or because the writer has never bothered to consider that people with opposing points of view might have legitimate reasons for their positions. Card is capable of portraying everyone as human beings, which is especially nice in a genre where people sometimes modify their ideologies in response to new situations.
ReplyDelete