“Hart’s War” is a POW / court
room hybrid. It’s like a mash-up of “A
Soldier’s Story” and “The Great Escape”.
It is based on a novel by John Katzenbach. It was directed by George Hoblit. It was filmed at a studio in Prague.
Hart (Colin Ferrell) is a green
staff officer who has no worries about combat because he is a Senator’s
son. Unfortunately, the Battle of the
Bulge sneaks up on him (it is quieter in this movie than others) and he gets
taken captive by some of those Germans-disguised-as-Americans. Within a two minute section, the movie also
manages to toss in a reference to the Malmedy Massacre. I was surprised they didn’t throw in
McAuliffe saying “Nuts!”
Instead of the usual play, why don't we stage a murder trial to break the boredom? |
Hart is interrogated by your
typical suave Nazi. He wants to know
where the fuel dumps are. You know, like
the one at the end of “Battle of the
Bulge”. Does Hart talk? Unsure.
He is put on a POW train which passes by a train full of Jews. Check that reference off. At one point a P-51 strafes the train in a
scene reminiscent of the crossing the Volga scene in “Enemy at the Gates”. There are explosions, quick cuts, and
generally frenetic running about.
When Hart arrives at Stalag VI
A, he is greeted by the sight of three Russian prisoners hanging. The German commandant Col. Visser (Marcel
Iures) is evil and the opposite of Col. Klink.
The ranking American officer is Col. MacNamara (Bruce Willis) who suspects
Hart ratted out the fuel dumps and it turns out he’s right. This conveniently results in Hart being
relegated to an enlisted man’s barracks so the movie can move in a new
direction. The plot is roiled by the arrival of two Tuskegee
Airmen. Would you believe they are not
welcomed by the white soldiers? In
particular, a loathsome cracker named Bedford (Cole Hauser) who plants a tent
spike in the bunk of one of the blacks which results in his execution. Guess what racist ends up dead with the other
black named Scott (Terrence Howard) standing over him? In between we get the CGI spectacle of a
German fighter getting shot down into the camp.
Cool. Oh, did I mention the
American fighter has its tail painted red?
Hey Southerners, look who came to our slumber party! |
McNamara insists on a
court-martial for Scott because he is accused of killing an American. This is intended as a distraction to cover an
escape attempt. Visser agrees to this
because… I’m not sure. McNamara appoints
Ferrell as defense attorney because…I’m not sure. Visser helps Hart by giving him an American
court-martial manual (which he keeps on his shelf next to his copy of Mein
Kampf). He does this because… I’m
not sure.
In the trial, Scott gets called
to the witness stand so he can break the fourth wall and give a speech about
mistreatment of blacks which mentions the better treatment of German POWs in
the American South. I would have
squirmed if I did not know all this stuff already. The speech is not maudlin and actually works
pretty well. McNamara is put on the
witness stand so Willis can do his Jack Nicholson (“A Few Good Men”)
imitation. While all this is going on
McNamara is supervising a tunnel to launch a raid on a nearby munitions camp. The trial is just a distraction. By the way, try not to be distracted by the
fact that the destruction of the munitions plant would most likely rain
executions on the prisoners. No one
argues whether it’s a good idea. The
movie closes strong with intercutting between the summations in the trial and
the escape. I won’t give away any of
what happens, but it is pretty powerful if implausible.
a Nazi, a Democrat, and a Republican |
“Hart’s War” is a war movie for
people who do not care about war movies.
It is aimed at the generic audience.
The producers appear to have doubted whether a regular prisoner escape
movie would be profitable so they added a court room drama and then threw in a
Tuskegee Airmen / Red Tails subplot so the film could have some gravitas. The fact the movie did not do well at the box
office tends to show that you shouldn’t structure a war movie based on
demographics. With that said, it is not
a bad movie. It is entertaining, if you
can suspend disbelief and just sit back and watch. The acting is good. Willis is strong and seems to have bought
into the character. Ferrell is adequate. Visser is sufficiently malevolent. Terrence Howard should be able to play a
Tuskegee Airmen in his sleep at this point.
The characters are not one-dimensional.
The dialogue is fine.
The major flaws in the movie are
due to aiming at a mass audience. The
themes are trite. Redemption of Hart
from being a rat. Sacrifice for your
country and men (McNamara). Honor is
more important than life (Scott). The
biggest problem is that in order to develop the themes, the script has to pile
on implausibilities and unrealities. For
instance, the whole opening scene where Hart is captured is absolutely
ridiculous to anyone familiar with the Battle of the Bulge. Even small touches can be aggravating. In the trial, Scott claims to have shot down
nine German planes in thirty missions.
No Red Tail came close to that figure.
Some cool twists partly make up for the predictability of the
themes. Another balancing factor is the
production values are strong. The camp
is one of the best in the subgenre. Real
effort went into it. The tunnel is also
well done and similar to that of “The Great Escape”. However, I’m not sure if reminding people of
“The Great Escape” is a good idea when your movie is much inferior.
Cracker? Unlikely. It is not even in the upper rank of POW movies.
GRADE
= B-
Great review. Mark Twain said that when he became an expert at reading the Mississippi River as a steamboat pilot he lost the ability to enjoy the river's beauty and poetry. I'm still not sure that I completely agree with Twain on this but certainly one of the costs of becoming acquainted with history is that it has turned me into even more of a movie nitpicker than I already was.
ReplyDeleteThis movie is a good example of what heavyweight actors and competent directing can add to a film. Take away the big-named actors and shoot the scenes a little more flatly and this would be dull and directionless. As it is, it still makes little sense for the reasons you describe but *feels* weightier. Unfortunately that's not enough to make it a good movie.
I love that Twain reference but my excuse for nitpicking would be that I was a History teacher for 39 years and a history buff for much longer.
Delete