VS.
ACTING
“84 Charlie Mopic” is a low budget movie that has actors it could
afford. A couple of the cast went on to
moderately successful TV careers and several were in “84 Charlie Mopic”. All things considered, the guys do an
excellent job. Each does a good job
developing his character and no one drains the momentum in the numerous moments
when it’s just the camera and them. The
facial reactions (it is an intimate movie) are especially impressive. Standouts are Nicholas Cascone as the impish
RTO and Richard Brooks as the hard core OD.
This movie does death scenes well.
A
“We Were Soldiers” is dominated by Mel Gibson as Col.
Moore. This happens to be a good Gibson
performance. He tones it down and does
not insist on being tortured. Sam
Elliott has a lot of fun playing the crusty sergeant and injects some welcome
humor. Barry Pepper is solid as the
photographer Joe Galloway. Greg Kinnear
is dashing as a helicopter pilot with balls of steel. The rest of the cast carries water
satisfactorily. The movie stands out
among Vietnam War movies in its depiction of the wives of the officers. Madeline Stowe is excellent as the sorority
mom and she is ably supported. A
FIRST QUARTER SCORE
84 Charlie Mopic 9
We Were Soldiers 9
PLOT
“84 Charlie Mopic” is the story of a Long Range
Reconnaissance Patrol with the twist that the unit is accompanied by a motion
picture cameraman referred to as MoPic.
The Army wants a documentary of a typical mission. To add to the abnormal dynamics, the tightly
knit unit (with its tightly wound sergeant OD) has to cope with a green LT
hoping to “punch his ticket” to higher command.
The routine mission turns out to be tragically less than routine. Thank goodness or this would have been a
pretty boring mission. The plot is
mostly exposition, but the dialogue flows well.
The action picks up after the characters have been developed to empathy
level. There is a nice buildup to the
tense finale with a cool twisty ending. A
“We Were Soldiers” is based on the acclaimed book
about the first major American battle of the war. The plot covers the development of the air cavalry
concept through training and then plunks the unit into a jungle clearing in
“Indian territory”. They are soon in the
middle of a s*** storm. Its “Zulu”
without the buildings and with sympathetic coverage of the enemy. The movie does a great job of intercutting
with the wives back at the base in the States.
The plot follows the book admirably closely with the glaring exception
of the ridiculous tacked-on happy Hollywood ending. The plot also can be criticized for
shoe-horning religion into the equation. B
HALF TIME SCORE
84 Charlie Mopic 18
We Were Soldiers 17
COMBAT
“84 Charlie Mopic” is really constrained by its low
budget when it comes to depiction of combat.
This is partly alleviated by the unique POV perspective. Although the combat is not balls to the wall,
it is realistic to this type of patrol.
It does lead to some very poignant deaths. B
“We Were Soldiers” has some of the most intense
action of any Vietnam War movie. We get some breathers once the battle begins.
This is welcome because the violence is draining. Believe it or not, the battle is less frenetic
than the actual Battle of Ia Drang. The
tactics of both sides are spot on. There
is no better film for understanding a conventional battle in Vietnam. There’s
no surrealism. Just turn it off before
the feel-good ending. A
THIRD QUARTER SCORE
84 Charlie Mopic 26
We Were Soldiers 26
REALISM
“84 Charlie Mopic” puts you with a LRRP. Granted, what is supposed to be a routine
mission is far from it. However,
everything that happens could have happened on a mission like this. The soldier behavior is authentic and the
dialogue is not forced. The dynamics are
a strength of the film. The squad has a
bond in spite of their various backgrounds and personalities. For instance, OD and Cracker are best buddies
when in the World they would hardly have been so. The jocularity of the soldiers is true to American
warriors. The relationship between the
rookie LT and OD has been jazzed up but accurately reflects the role of veteran
sergeants in leading units and the fact that many officers sought temporary
combat to enhance their careers. A+
“We Were Soldiers” is a realistic depiction of
conventional warfare in Vietnam. It
sticks to the basic facts of an actual battle until it goes off the track in
the end. The movie concentrates on Lt.
Col. Moore and he was a technical advisor so we can assume he vetted the
command decisions and Gibson’s portrayal.
Although the religiousity is pushy, it does match Moore’s strong faith
and reflects the stronger religious beliefs of the Army in 1964. The lack of cursing by the soldiers is
unrealistic in spite of the supposed Kennedyesque innocence of the
enlistees. The movie saved the R
material for the bloodshed. Kudos to the
realistic coverage of Moore’s Vietnamese counterpart Col. Anh. The realism breaks down at the end when the
movie sends a message that belies its theme that America was in for a load of
trouble in Vietnam. B
FINAL SCORE
84 Charlie Mopic 36
We Were Soldiers 34
ANALYSIS
This was an awesome match-up for an opening round
duel. It is a shame one of them has to
exit the tournament this early. The
films could not have been more different.
WWS is big budget, with an all-star cast, and covers an entire
battle. 84 CM is small budget, no-name
cast, and covers one mission. Both do a
great job achieving their cinematic goals.
WWS is a bit heavy-handed in parts and is hurt by the atrocious ending
bayonet charge. Contrast that with the
unpredictable and somber ending of 84CM and you can see why it deserved to
win. Sometimes smaller is better, especially
when smaller is the underdog. Both
movies are great history lessons, but you can read a book about the Battle of
Ia Drang to get the historical facts whereas 84CM puts you in the boots of the
soldiers.
watch the winner!
I saw 84 charly when it was first released to video. most impressive.Agree with your dual review virtualy point by point.84 is the definite winner for charactor and realism,Mel's big budget shows at all times in excess and CGI.
ReplyDeleteI think I first saw it when it ran on PBS.
Delete