VS.
MATCH-UP: “Hell’s Angels” was Howard Hughes’ aerial epic. It is the tale of two brothers who become
fighter pilots in WWI. There is a love
triangle involving a loose woman. One of
the brothers is naïve and pure and the other is cowardly and unpatriotic. The movie is best known for its Zeppelin
bombing London scene and the huge swirling dog fight after the explosion laden
bombing of an ammo dump.
“Top Gun” is Hollywood’s answer to what fourteen year
old boys want in a war movie. "Maverick" is sent to Top Gun school to become a top notch fighter pilot. He is in competition with a hot shot named
“Ice Man” who believes you win dogfights through discipline and adherence to
basic principles of air combat. What a
chump! Maverick is more of a fly by the
seat of your pants rule-breaker. (Note
the nicknames.) This personality trait
gets him in trouble with the higher ups, but his bosses recognize brilliance
when they see it. You want this guy with
you if there ever is a non-mock dogfight (and stick around because there is
one!). Did I mention there is a love
story involving the school’s resident MiG expert? Relax, the expert is a hot woman!
FIRST QUARTER:
Dogfighting Quantity
Hell’s Angels = 14
minutes
Top Gun = * 20 minutes
* I included the mock dogfights
FIRST QUARTER SCORE:
Top Gun 9
Hell’s Angels 8
SECOND QUARTER:
Plot
“Hell’s Angels” started as a silent movie and has a
plot appropriate for that era. There is
a love triangle involving two brothers that is interesting due to the fact that
two of the people involved are despicable.
The movie sets up a classic redemption scenario then adds a twist. It’s not predictability that mars the film,
it’s the ridiculous disregard for common sense and what is possible. Lot’s of very unlikely things have to happen
to reach the conclusion. Thankfully all
anyone remembers are the groundbreaking dogfights. C
“Top Gun” was designed to please all the demographics except
war movie fans. The plot is predictable
and is principally about redemption. As
though coming back from causing the death of Maverick’s best friend is not
enough, the screenwriters throw in a vague back-story about his disgraced
father. The movie bookends two
encounters with black-painted MiGs (no reason for a 1980s movie to defy the
black = evil rule). In between we get a
lot of locker room dramatics and faux dog fights. There is a lame and extremely unlikely love
story for the ladies. F
HALF-TIME SCORE:
Hell’s Angels 15
Top Gun 14
THIRD QUARTER:
Realism and Accuracy
None of the plot devices in “Hell’s Angels” are
realistic. The two brothers have a
German friend who they ironically meet in the Zeppelin attack. The German sabotages the bombing of London
because he apparently loves his friends’ country more than his own. The Zeppelin crew sacrifices itself like
lemmings. The femme fatale ends up on
the Western Front because it was a target rich environment. The two brothers know how to fly a captured
bomber without even a tutorial. In fact,
the whole bombing of the ammo dump segment is laughable with collateral
explosions worthy of a modern movie. The
sole redemption for realism is the swirling dogfights, but even there the
tactics are shaky. D
“Top Gun” may seem realistic to your average
moviegoer, but anyone with any knowledge of naval aviation will do a lot of
eye-rolling. To the knowledgeable, there
are plot devices that are ridiculous.
This begins early when the pilot considered the best in the unit has a
panic attack doing what he was trained to do.
Worse is the introduction of a MiG expert in the form of a hot female
instructor. I hope I do not sound sexist
when I say that character was silly. The
death of Goose was physically impossible.
For a movie that was heavily vetted by the Navy, it is odd that they
allowed a scene trashing their ejection seats and helmets. On the other hand, the segments involving the
Fighter Weapons School seem within reason.
The mock dogfights, although enhanced for dramatic purposes, are
believable. D
THIRD QUARTER SCORE:
Hell’s Angels 21
Top Gun 20
FOURTH QUARTER:
Cliches
Monte is a ladies’ man and it’s a curse because he
can’t help but sleep with his saintly brother’s girlfriend. Monte and Roy ride in a motorcycle and
sidecar. They party hard the night
before their suicide mission. There is a
head on crash. B
Maverick not only rides a motorcycle, he owns
one! He loses his best friend because he
is a glory hound. Kudos for combining
two clichés. The pilots party hard and
bring back the WWI movie singalong.
Maverick woos a local girl. In
addition, we get the generic tropes of the main character earning redemption
and overcoming a crisis in confidence. D
FINAL SCORE:
Hell’s Angels 29
Top Gun 26
POST-MATCH ANALYSIS:
These two movies are 56 years apart and although the
match-up is Old School versus MTV School, the basic plots could have replaced
each other without the audiences being confused. “Hell’s Angels” is overrated, but it does
have history going for it. It was the
first significant sound air combat movie.
“Top Gun” has the distinction of being the first air combat film to have
a thundering rock sound track. “Hell’s
Angels” was made to please Howard Hughes and “Top Gun” was made to please John
Hughes’ core audience.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe nationality of the MiGs is vague but I have always assumed they were Middle Eastern. I do not have proof of this but the scenario seems suspiciously similar to the 1981 Gulf of Sidra Incident where two Libyan Su-22s fired on some F-14s and were subsequently shot down. The Su-22s were painted jet black. Just kidding. I am aware of no shooting confrontations between American jets and Soviet jets at any time.
ReplyDeleteI've read a few sites speculating that the villains were from South Yemen, which was a Soviet client at the time. That at least would match the setting, as they mention being in the Indian Ocean. North Korea might fit, too.
ReplyDeleteThanks. South Yemen makes sense, but I still think its Libya.
Delete