Our July story was by Guy de
Maupassant. He was a popular French writer in the 19th Century. He wrote around 300 short stories and is
considered to be one of the fathers of the modern short story. Many of his short stories (including this
one) are set in the Franco-Prussian War.
His common theme was the futility of war and its negative impact on civilians.
This particular story has a
French colonel in the Franco-Prussian War ruminating on the role of women in
war. He expounds that Frenchmen love
women and they fight harder when women are involved. This philosophizing is brought on by the
dilemma his unit is trapped in. They are caught behind enemy lines and are in
bad shape. The men are exhausted and
their morale is low. To make matters
worse, it is cold and snowy. Most of the
men do not want to go on. It’s too bad
they don’t have a woman to motivate them.
But wait… They encounter an old
man and his pretty daughter. Suddenly
the spirits of the men soar. They have
something to live for and something to fight for. The timing is perfect because they soon run
into a unit of Prussian lancers. They
dispatch the horsemen with rifle fire.
It is assumed that if that pretty girl had not been with them, they
would not have put up much of a fight.
It’s a shame the French army in 1940 was not issued a pretty girl for
each regiment.
I don’t know what to make of
this story. I assume Maupassant had a
great sense of humor and the story was written tongue in cheek. Then again, he may have been accurate in his
assessment of what it takes to get the French to fight. The story certainly is comical given France’s
track record since he wrote the story.
Perhaps he was lamenting France’s performance in the Franco-Prussian War. He does mention that the outcome of the
Battle of Sedan might have been different if a woman had been involved. After all, French men are “cavaliers of
love”. You would think that would make
them lovers not fighters, but the colonel suggests that if you combine the two,
look out.
I have to say the story was a
disappointment. It’s not much of a war
story and I felt it was a bit on the silly side. I’m no fan of the French army in recent
history, but the story seemed to be kicking a dead horse. I know that is not what Maupassant intended,
but it does have a lot of irony flowing from it. It is a fun read, however. One of the soldiers actually says “confound
it”. How 19th Century. Better yet, another proclaims that “there is
nothing like a woman to make you feel queer from head to foot”! Insert your own comment here.
GRADE = D
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please fell free to comment. I would love to hear what you think and will respond.