Monday, August 29, 2016

CRACKER? The Execution of Private Slovik (1974)

                “The Execution of Private Slovik” has been one of my great white whales for some time now. (Another is “Ice Cold in Alex”.)  I finally was able to watch it again after having seen it forty-two years ago when it appeared on NBC as a made-for-TV special.  The movie was based on a nonfiction book by William Bradford Huie published in 1954.  It was directed by Lamont Johnson.  He was nominated for an Emmy, as was the movie.  The movie won two Emmys for editing.  It also won a Peabody Award.  Originally, the movie was supposed to be made by Frank Sinatra, who was interested in the story.  However, Sinatra wanted to use a screenplay by Albert Maltz, but that was during the Cold War and Maltz had been black-listed as one of the Hollywood Ten.  Sinatra was accused of being a Communist sympathizer and the Kennedy campaign put pressure on him to drop the project.

                The movie opens in January, 1945 in France.  The execution is being prepared.  A member of the firing squad mentions that no American has been executed for desertion yet.  The consensus among the twelve men is Slovik (Martin Sheen) has it coming to him.  No one is thrilled to be part of the detail.  A chaplain named Father Stafford (Ned Beatty) bucks them up by proclaiming that “a higher authority has accepted moral responsibility”.  Do your duty.  When one soldier proposes purposely missing, another says “I’m not going to miss… He didn’t care about how many of us got shot up, so I’m not going to care about him.” 

                The movie now flashes back to how Slovik got to this point.  The narrative takes the form of characters reminiscing about Eddie.  Starting with the warden of the prison Eddie is being paroled from for theft.  The warden makes a point of stating that he could have predicted that the “sweet kid” would freeze or run the first time he was in combat.  Slovik gets a job and courts the bookkeeper of his employer.  They get married and are living happily, if poorly, with the comforting knowledge that as an ex-con he is designated 4-F and thus not draftable.  This changes on their first anniversary when they find out he has been reclassified 1-A.  “Greetings” is not far away.  It’s off to boot camp where Eddie is a sad sack, but good enough to be a replacement.  On his way to the front, he and his buddy Jimmy (Gary Busey) take refuge from a bombardment and it’s a turning point for him because he vows never to go through that again.  Maybe he won’t have to as the two stragglers end up with a Canadian rear unit for a few idyllic weeks.  However, all good things must come to an end as Eddie and Jimmy are eventually returned to their unit.  Eddie is up-front about his cowardice with his commanding officer and when the Captain is not sympathetic, Eddie flees.  The rest is history.

                “The Execution of Private Slovik” is like a well-acted docudrama.  I refer to it being semi-documentary because it is awesomely accurate.  You do not need to read Huie’s book.  There are no significant enhancements of the real story.  It shows you how entertaining the tale is even without enhancement.  But it’s not just the fact that you learn exactly what happened in the most famous case of military justice involving an American soldier in WWII.  It is more importantly a movie that helps right a wrong.  There is no doubt that the execution was an egregious injustice that taints the reputations of Gen. Norman Cota (commander of the 28th Division) and Gen. Eisenhower.  Both of whom refused to commute the sentence. There were 21,000 convictions for desertion of American soldiers during the war.  This was the only one of 49 death penalties for desertion that was not commuted!  It was the only execution by the U.S. military that was not for rape and/or murder of a civilian.  (There were 102 of those executions.)  Slovik was the proverbial example that was made because morale was shaky at this point in the war and the upcoming assault on Heurtgen Forest was going to be a rough one.  Slovik had incredibly bad timing for his confession.

                The movie is very competently made for a movie that had a budget of less than a million dollars.  The cast is minor with the only stars being Sheen and Beatty.  Sheen is outstanding and was nominated for an Emmy.  He nails the petty thief who is getting his life together when he is thrust into a situation he could not handle.  Surprisingly, the cinematography is noteworthy.  There is an intriguing mixture of high and low shots and some far shots.  Not what you would expect from a made-for-TV movie.  The plot is not melodramatic.  It is a bit simplistic, but I have already mentioned that it is true to the story.  The nonlinear structure works and the decision to tell the story partly through narration by different people was a good one.  The movie does a great job as a tutorial on how a court-martial and execution worked in WWII.  It gets all the little details right.  For example, if the condemned was not able to stand on his own, they would be strapped to what was called a “collapse board”.

                “The Execution of Private Slovik” was well worth the wait.  It is a must-see for not only war movie lovers, but fans of American History.  It is one of the most accurate war movies I have seen.  It is an important movie as it brings a travesty to the public.  To most, even knowledgeable Americans, Slovik was a trivia answer.  Who was the only American soldier executed for desertion in WWII?  You would have to assume that he must have done something incredibly cowardly that cost the lives of other Americans.  In 1987, President Reagan was persuaded to allow Eddie Slovik’s body to be exhumed and reburied next to his wife.  Maybe as an ex-actor, he was influenced by the movie.  I would like to think so.

GRADE  =  A-


  1. Thanks for the write-up, I've been curious to see this one for awhile.

  2. Martin Sheen was perfectly cast in this, especially considering his anti war activism in later years.
    A very solid movie, hard to believe it was such a hit when it was first screened though ( something to do with Vietnam hangover as some suggest) I can't imagine this movie being made now...

    1. I agree, Rex. I wonder if starring in the movie helped shape his liberalism or if he was already there. You are right about it being a surprise hit, but so was "Tribes" which had a similar vibe. "Tribes" is another forgotten gem. I just found it on You Tube and will review it soon.

  3. I'd read that the military execution scene in the film, The Victors, is supposed to be about Slovik. A very sobering scene in that film with the Christmas music playing.

    Thank you for the review for a film I haven't seen.



Please fell free to comment. I would love to hear what you think and will respond.