Someone
finally had the nerve to try to bring Patrick O’Brian to the screen. For you non-literary types, O’Brian was an acclaimed
writer of nautical fiction. He wrote a
series of novels set in the Napoleonic Wars.
The main characters were a British captain named Jack Aubrey and a
ship’s doctor/espionage agent named Stephen Maturin. They are best friends although of very different
personalities. In the novels, their relationship takes precedence over traditional plotting. O’Brian had a way with words that resulted in
a legion of fans. I am not among
them. This is surprising because I am a
big fan of Napoleonic naval warfare fiction.
I love the Horatio Hornblower series, for instance. I have never been able to get into O’Brian, although I have read the first book. I
guess I just prefer traditional plotting.
And more ship-to-ship combat. Peter Weir (“Gallipoli”) took on the task of
adapting O’Brian. He wisely decided to
start in the middle of the series with book 10 – “The Far Side of the
World”. He also wisely decided to stick
to a traditional narrative structure.
The
effort that went into the film is truly incredible. Weir was able to convince the studios to
invest $150 million in a movie that had a sketchy market. In the cinematic world of “Fast and Furious”,
who wanted to see a movie about fighting frigates? Thankfully, enough to make a profit, but not
enough to warrant a sequel. Much of the
cost went into Weir’s obsession with making the movie as perfect a depiction of
Napoleonic naval warfare as possible.
Weir bought a replica ship called the “Rose” for $1.5 million and then
had extensive changes made to it to portray the HMS Surprise. It was used for the sailing scenes. A full scale model on a gimbal in a giant
water tank (the same one used for “Titanic”) was also used in the filming. 27 miles of rope were on the model. The costume department made 1,900 pairs of
shoes, over 2,000 costumes, and around 2,000 hats. The prop department was fixated with getting
even the tiniest details accurate, including items that would not even make it
onto film. The efforts paid off as the
movie was rewarded with ten Academy Award nominations including Best Picture
and Best Director. It won for Best
Cinematography and Best Sound Editing.
“April,
1805, Napoleon is master of Europe and only the British fleet stands before him
– oceans are now battlefields.” The HMS
Surprise is cruising off the coast of Brazil.
It is a 28-gun frigate commanded by Capt. Jack Aubrey (Russell Crowe). His crew of 197 call him “Lucky Jack” because
he has always brought them success. His
mission is to intercept a French privateer named the Acheron which has been
raiding British commerce. The French
frigate is American-made and has 44 guns.
In naval combat, it was all about the number of guns and America made
some very stout warships. For this
reason, the Surprise is the underdog. It
doesn’t help that in their first encounter the Acheron surprises its hunter and
kicks its butt. This battle takes place
within the first ten minutes of the movie.
So much for developing the Aubrey/Maturin relationship. Weir will let us figure it out as we go
along. One thing we learn early about
Aubrey is he is not the type to give up after an ass-whipping. Instead of returning to port for repairs,
they will continue pursuit and repair themselves along the way. As far as Maturin (Paul Bettany), we learn that
he is a way better doctor than you would expect on a warship. (In other words,
he is not a drunken hack.) He is also a
man of the Enlightenment and not enamored with the ways of the Royal Navy. This is the key difference between him and
his warrior best friend. The only thing
they really have in common is love of music.
Aubrey plays the violin and Maturin plays the cello.
The
movie is not just a buddy film. It also
has a touch of the chase film in it. You
know the chase is going to end in a show-stopping duel, but to get to that
scene we get some entertaining subplots.
The Surprise survives a horrific storm, although not every character
survives. Midshipman Hollum (Lee
Ingleby) gets a reputation as a Jonah (the naval equivalent of a jinx) and this
has to be resolved to continue the voyage.
Maturin has to operate on himself after an accident on board. The operation takes place on the Galapagos
Islands! Join the Royal Navy (or get
impressed into it) and see the world.
And kill people. That last is a
reference to the climactic battle which is well worth the wait.
The
attention to detail in “Master and Commander” is astounding. This is one movie that I have to single out
the suits for allowing Weir to make the movie his way. I would guess the movie could have been made
for $50 million less and still have been good.
And much of this effort was to impress the rather small community of
Napoleonic naval warfare nuts. It is a
shame that the average viewer did not have a clue what went into making the
film. Unless you did research, you would
not have known that the movie used a replica, a full-scale model in a tank, and
a smaller model. We just assume CGI
these days. I defy you to tell which is
which in the movie. The sets are
authentic to the time period. The
verisimilitude is noteworthy. This is
especially true for below decks. (With
one caveat, the ceilings were a lofty five feet, which was higher than on an
actual frigate.)
The
cast bought into Weir’s vision. They
went through a two-week boot camp that included gun training, swordsmanship,
and practice in working the ship. That
included going up the rigging. The
speaking roles were given to mostly British stage actors that Americans would
not recognize, but they are uniformly excellent. (Weir’s decision to confine the movie to the
ship resulted in no speaking roles for women.
This is the rare nautical film with no romance.) The script gives fair
treatment to the tars as well as the officers.
Several characters get to shine, including two of the young midshipmen. Special mention must be made of the
extras. The casting director combed the
world for faces that would reflect the cosmopolitan nature of a British crew. They knew their roles as crewmen of a frigate
and they knew their actions on the peripheries of scenes would enhance instead
of detract from the authenticity of the movie.
With this said, clearly the movie depends on the performances of the two
leads.
Crowe
was the perfect choice for Aubrey. He
has the commanding presence of a captain.
Aubrey is one of the great characters of literature and Crowe is up to
it. (By the way, he does not look like
the literary Lucky Jack.) I learned new respect for Crowe when I discovered he
learned how to play the violin for his role.
He has the physicality for the action scenes. Bettany is a match. Maturin is the more intriguing character as
he is unique on board the ship. The man
of science amongst the military men. The
scenes in the officer’s mess are great for the banter of seamen, but also
because Maturin squirms and sometimes makes cynical remarks about the military
ethos. A subplot involves Aubrey and
Maturin’s disagreement about the dictatorial nature of a captain’s power. The movie does take the time to provoke some
thinking. As in the tradition of
cinematic captains, is Aubrey too reckless?
Bettany shines and gets some show-stopping scenes like when he traverses
one of the Galapagos Island searching for specimens. (The movie was the first non-documentary to
be allowed to film there.) He takes
acting honors with his self-surgery for a bullet wound. (A scene that appears in the novel “HMS
Surprise”.)
“Master
and Commander” closes with one of the great combat scenes in war movie
history. It is almost seven minutes of total
mayhem. The exchange of cannonballs is
followed by a boarding that results in a melee.
The choreography must have taken weeks.
It’s all very believable and graphic.
This is followed by a twisty ending that left fans expecting a sequel
which has sadly not materialized.
Will
“Master and Commander” crack my 100 Best War Movies list? After reading this review, what do you
think? It is certainly the best movie
for teaching details about Napoleonic naval warfare. See below.
GRADE = A
Napoleonic Warfare Details
from “Master and Commander”
1. Cannons on Royal Navy ships had
nicknames like “Jumping Billy” and “Sudden Death”
2. They used a lead weight to measure
fathoms and a rope with knots to measure the ship’s speed.
3. “Beat to quarters” meant prepare for
combat.
4. Young boys called “powder monkeys” had
the job of bringing powder bags to the cannons during battle.
5. Before a battle, the captain’s valuables
would be put In boats towed behind the ship.
6. The “weather gauge” was important. It meant your ship was upwind of its
opponent.
7. Corpses were stitched up in their
hammocks for burial at sea. The last
stitch was put through the nose to be sure they were dead.
8. Plates for food were square (as in
“square meals”).
9. Men kept their possessions in sea
chests.
10. Sailors saluted by touching their
knuckles to their forehead.
11. Sailors were given a ration of “grog”
which was a mixture of rum and water.
12. Some of the sailors were “impressed”
which means they were forcibly enrolled into the service or tricked into it.
13. “Boarding pikes” were used by boarding
parties.
14. Capt. Aubrey inspires his crew by saying
“For England, for home, and for the prize”.
“The prize” is a reference to capturing an enemy ship which when
returned to England would result in the crew sharing in “prize money”.
15. Boarding parties used grenades.
16. One of the boarders carries a Nock gun
which is a multi-barreled flintlock smoothbore with one hell of a kick.
17. A surrendering captain would offer his
sword.
18. A “prize crew” consisting of one of the
officers and a few of the men would sail the captured ship back to a friendly
port.
19. Sailors could be badly wounded or even
killed by splinters created by cannon balls hitting the wooden ships.
Grade A? it says it all. I need to grab my copy soon and need to watch it. Thank you for sharing the review with us and keep posting more such posts
ReplyDeleteGreat review, interesting facts. I'm inspired to watch this again tonight.. thanks!!
ReplyDeleteAs you know, I am a huge fan of the books. I share your respect for director Peter Weir's efforts and dedication but the 20 books are essentially one long tightly connected story where personal relationships receive more attention than battles. I loved the ship, which recreated the royal Navy during the Napoleonic War, but the rest of the movie did not live up to the books. Honestly, the books can only be done properly as a TV series. Your summery of the facts presented int he movie was really interesting.
ReplyDeletePossibly the best war movie ever. I dig the bravery and leadership of the young midshipmen and the bloodthirsty enthusiasm of the crew. And the touch with the crew common with captains of frigates and smaller vessels.
ReplyDeleteI started to suspect that the captain of the opposing ship in the original source was American, not French, when one of the crew explains that the opposing vessel is a Constitution-class frigate built in New England (and then produces a perfect scale model of the vessel!). A brief internet search confirmed my suspicion.
ReplyDeleteThis is the first time I can recall being the beneficiary of PC revisionism. Usually you see North Korea substituting for China, SPECTRE substituting for Russia, or anachronistic Nazis substituting for Islamic Terrorists.
I think I could have handled seeing my countrymen as the villains and would have enjoyed the film without the change but I'll admit I would probably have not have rooted so hard for the British heroes.
I have to admit I would not have enjoyed the movie as much if it was an American foe. That was a wise box office change. And it is a fictional story so it's not like "U-571".
Delete