Leningrad underwent a three year siege by the German
army in WWII. The citizens underwent
terrible hardships during the siege. But
worse is what happened to a blond female journalist, apparently. The movie was directed and written by
Aleksandr Buravskiy. It was a
Russian/British production. It is not
based on a true story.
The movie begins in September, 1941 which is when the
siege began. A battle scene has raw
recruits arriving at the front line trenches in the middle of a battle. They charge into no man’s land and a melee
ensues. The set is realistic, the wounds
are graphic, and the action is pretty intense.
Hitler complains to Gen. Von Loeb that Leningrad is not falling quick
enough. But this is not going to be a
movie about command decisions or combat between the armies. It is going to be about a news reporter stuck
in Leningrad.
Katie Davis (Mila Sorvino) gets left behind when her
flight takes the other journalists out of the danger zone. She gets caught in a CGI bombing raid. The effects are poor and it is a silly
scene. This is our first inkling that we
are watching another Miro Sorvino direct-to-video effort. What happened to this woman’s career?
Katie is saved by a spunky Soviet policewoman named
Nina (Olga Sutulova). Nina puts up Katie
with her family which includes her chess prodigy brother. Katie and Nina bond in an excruciating
scene. The dialogue is horrible and the
acting is atrocious. A subplot develops
when Nina finds out that Katie is the daughter of a traitorous Russian
general. Dilemma time. Meanwhile, for balance, Von Loeb’s nephew is
refusing to fly bombing raids against civilians. He persists even after his uncle points out
that the CGI fighters are not actually carrying the bombs they drop (like every
fighter that drops bombs in war movies).
Nina helps open up the lake road that provides a supply line for the
Soviets. She might be able to get Nina
out that way. Unless this is a movie
filled with stupidity.
“Attack on Leningrad” is a terrible movie. You would think you could set a drama in the
siege and create some human interest and entertainment. Buravskiy is not capable of doing that. There is some taste of how hard the situation
was for the civilians, but not enough.
Instead, we are supposed to be concerned for a journalist. It doesn’t help that the journalist is played
by recent Sorvino. Gabriel Byrne does
not cover himself in glory either. The
movie is just flat-out embarrassing. For
that reason, it is depressing, but not because of what the characters go
through. It is depressing that I sat
through it. It’s not often that I beg
for a war movie to end. This was one of
those cases.
P.S. Check out the ridiculous poster! Would you pay money to see that movie?
GRADE = F-
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please fell free to comment. I would love to hear what you think and will respond.