Back
when I was a teenager, there was something called the ABC Movie of the Week. This was before DVDs and even before VHS
tapes. You went to a movie theater,
waited for your favorite movie to play on TV, or you watched a made-for-TV
movie like “Tribes”. Most of those
television productions were forgettable, but a few were noteworthy. “Tribes” got huge ratings and struck a chord
in Vietnam America. It was directed by
Joseph Sargent (“Tobruk”, “MacArthur”).
He was nominated for an Emmy for best TV movie. The movie won Emmys for Sound Editing, Sound
Mixing, and Original Teleplay. It was so
successful it was given a limited release in America and played in British
theaters as “The Soldier Who Declared Peace”.
The
movie states its theme immediately by having a hippie ballad play over the
credits. Nixon fans needed to tune out
at this point. Adrian (Jan-Michael
Vincent) is one of a group of new draftees who arrive at boot camp to be reamed
by DI Drake (Darren McGavin). He calls
them “do-dos”! Adrian is dressed as a
hippy and has long hair (until the end of the credits). “You and me are not going to get along.” Like the audience needs to be told that. But don’t expect this to be a typical boot
camp movie. Adrian is actually not a bad
recruit and although Drake is hard on him, he is not a villain. That role is reserved for his frenemy Sgt.
DePayster (Earl Holliman) who makes it his goal to wash-out Adrian. There is no dysfunction in the platoon, but
it does go through all the key boot camp moments. They march.
They shoot. (But miss on purpose
if you are Adrian.) They pummel each
other with pugil sticks. (Or get
pummeled if you are Adrian.) They run
the obstacle course. Adrian does not
spout much hippie peacenik crap, although he does tell Drake: “Your whole bag is death.” He
does turn the recruits onto meditation to handle the sadism of the system. Unlike the Hartman/Lawrence arc in “Full
Metal Jacket”, in this movie the DI adjusts to the recruit. Or at least, they come to an understanding. Agree to disagree. Drake:
“We’re from different tribes.” (This one line makes the renaming of the movie
“The Tribe” totally ridiculous.)
The
Movie of the Week series was a mixed bag.
Most were very forgettable. Some
were high quality with decent casts.
“Tribes” was one of the better ones.
Vincent and McGavin have chemistry and give solid performances. This was Vincent’s first big role. The dialogue is fine and keeps the preaching
to a minimum until the end. You can
watch it today and not laugh at some screenwriter’s idea of how hippies
talked.
The
problem with the movie is its strength is also its weakness. Although firmly in the boot camp subgenre, it
avoids most of the clichés and stereotypes.
Adrian is not the first pacifist to be put in a movie boot camp, but he is
far from Bozz in “Tigerland”, a movie that is the opposite of this one. The movie is not predictable because it defies
the conventions of the subgenre. The
lack of dysfunction within the unit reduces the drama. Only one recruit cracks. This tame depiction flies in the face of most
of other boot camp movie scenarios. This
was probably a combination of the cooperation of the military and the
cautiousness of a TV production. Adrian
has a hard time not because he is a troublemaker or a detriment to the
unit. Drake is harsh, but he is not trying
to break him. The wild card is having
another DI interfere with the Drake/Adrian dynamic. This is unrealistic, but allows the movie to
achieve its goal of having the military (personified by Drake) show it can
adjust to the Vietnam generation. Yet,
it can still conclude with a sobering conclusion that pacifism and preparation
for war cannot coexist.
“Tribes”
hit the country at exactly the right moment.
People were souring on the war and it tapped into that, but it is not a
polarizing movie. Although clearly
anti-war, it is not overtly anti-Vietnam War.
Adrian is not a Vietnam War protester, he’s a pacifist. I doubt the movie changed any minds. It’s pretty tame as you would expect from a
TV movie competing for ratings. Mission
accomplished. However, it did not just
get great ratings, it became a water cooler movie. It is largely a forgotten movie, although not
so much by people who saw it live. It is
not out on DVD, but you can see a less than high quality copy on YouTube.
GRADE = B-
My top 5
movie drill instructors:
5. Hulka
(Stripes)
4. Drake
(Tribes)
3. Moore (The D.I.)
2. Foley
(An Officer and a Gentleman)
1. Hartman
(Full Metal Jacket)
I did not watch this film in its historical moment so I cannot say whether it was right for its time. I saw it after the death of the illusion that the Hippies were the cusp of some profound and transformative national movement and to me Adrian seemed like a Mary Sue character, especially following the reveal that he possesses meditation superpowers.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you that the relationship between Adrian and Drake is the best part of the film, helped greatly by the fact that both men are shown to be acting in good faith from within their respective positions.
Youtube sounds like an adequate medium for the movie, which does not depend on special effects or small visual details. I had not realized that the movie had been made for television (and at a time when some of those receiving TVs would still have been in black and white) but it makes a lot of sense.
Mary Sue?
DeleteIt's a reference from fanfiction, where authors sometimes get into the bad habit of making one of the characters who they particularly identify with a kind of ideal (at least in the author's eyes) who has special qualities over all other characters, never loses an argument, is never wrong (the story may actually work hard to contrive factual outcomes that make sure that this is so), and is admired by everyone who is not an outright villain.
DeleteThe term comes from a character in an old Star Trek fiction story who was herself a parody of these creatures, who tended to insert themselves into stories in order to capture the affections of Captain Kirk or Mr. Spock.
It is a term that is thrown around a bit too quickly at characters whom a critic dislikes, and I might be too free with it here but I do think he does smell of a scriptwriter's pet whom the movie shills.
Thanks for the explanation.
Delete