In 1935, C.S. Forester
published his adventure novel The African Queen. It is probably his most famous stand-alone
novel. He also wrote the Horatio
Hornblower series. The African Queen
adds romance to adventure. It is set in
Africa during WWI and involves an odd couple who decide to try to sink a German
warship that dominates a strategic lake.
The title refers to the small steamboat that they attempt the task
with. To get to their target, they must
navigate a rapid-filled river and overcome numerous obstacles. Their love develops as they conquer
nature. In 1951, John Huston made the
classic film based on the novel. It
starred Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn.
The screenplay was written by Huston, James Agee, Peter Viertel, and John
Collier. The adapted screenplay was nominated
for an Oscar. The script was faithful to
the novel until the end. There were some
significant changes made for the trek part of the story. I am going to assume you have seen the movie,
so be aware that the following comparison of the book to the movie will reveal
details of the plot. I will concentrate
on the book and how the movie made changes.
The book begins with Rose and
her brother praying. He is ill and dies
that night. The Germans have already
come to their village and taken the villagers away. They did not burn the village. Rose blames the Germans for her brother’s
death and this increases her hatred toward them. She already had problems with their
mistreatment of them and their villagers.
She dreams of revenge, but what can a woman do? Then along comes Charlie. In the book, Charlie is British and speaks
with a heavy cockney accent. (Since
Bogart could not handle the accent, Charlie was changed to a Canadian.) Rose is very patriotic and besides revenge,
wants to strike a blow for the British Empire.
She convinces Charlie that the blow will be the sinking of the German
warship Konigin Luise. He gives in easy
because he figures her first taste of rapids will douse her ardor. Instead, Rose is transformed by the
experience and is exhilarated by the action and adventure that is so different
from her previous life as a proper woman.
This is made evident early on when she is not offended and does not
evict him from her dry bed when Charlie crawls in during a rain storm. When Charlie gets drunk and stands up to her,
she does dump his liquor, but unlike the movie, she does it for revenge. Similarly, the silent treatment is not to get
him to reconsider, it just happens to work out that way.
As in the movie, they fall in
love. However, although Forester does not go into detail, their love goes
beyond chaste kissing. She is more
domineering than in the movie. “He was a
man made to be hen-pecked.” The book
covers in detail the running of the series of rapids, the repair of the shaft,
passing by the fort. It includes the
mosquito attack and the leeches. They
get through the reeds mainly by rowing or pulling on the reed roots with a boat
hook. It takes weeks. They do not get
stuck and get miraculously saved by rain raising the water level. They contract malaria. The preparation for the attack on the warship
is basically replicated in the movie, but the aftermath is radically different.
In the novel, Charlie is
captured after the African Queen goes down in the storm. He is accused of espionage for spying on the
ship from the island and wanting to destroy the ship’s stores on shore. He is going to be found guilty when Rose is
brought in. She does not tell them anything about their plan. She was found with the African Queen life buoy
so they figure out who the couple is. The
Captain decides not to execute them because Rose is a remarkable woman and he
admires what they accomplished. He
releases them to the British authorities.
Meanwhile, the British have moved two motor boats to the lake to
confront the Konigin Luise. These
warships are fast and maneuverable and have three-inch guns. They easily and anticlimactically sink the
German ship. The British commander makes
arrangements to send Charlie and Rose to the coast where he expects Charlie to
enlist and Rose to return to England.
Rose proposes marriage and they agree to get married as soon as they
reach the British consul.
Naturally, the book gives more
details than the movie. The running of
the rapids is much more suspenseful.
Rose is an amazing steerswoman in the book. The period in the reeds is more exhausting
and has the malaria thrown in. Fixing
the shaft is more complicated and time consuming. But other than more details, the journey to
the lake is very similar to the book.
The characters are also very similar, other than Charlie being Canadian
in the movie. The book Charlie is meeker
and less intelligent. No surprise that
character was given more testosterone.
Rose is a proto-feminist in the book.
She starts as a spinster and ends up an action hero. She is much more interesting than Charlie and
Forester has her dominating Charlie and the narrative. She blooms as a result of the adventure. She knows she is coming out of her
cocoon. For 1950s reasons the movie made
her more traditional. And obviously, she
could not be having premarital sex, and enjoying it!
The reason why the movie is
better than the book is it keeps the basics and vastly improves the
ending. Forester flubbed the ending
badly. To have Charlie and Rose fail
after all they went through may have been realistic, but it hardly was
crowd-pleasing. If Hollywood is
anything, it is crowd-pleasing. The
scriptwriters deserve a lot of credit for improving the ending and it is
genius. The twist puts a cherry on top
of a movie that was already perfect.
BOOK = B-
MOVIE = A
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please fell free to comment. I would love to hear what you think and will respond.