In 2004,
Oliver Stone released his take on Alexander the Great. Historians and other intelligent people
feared what the “JFK” director might do to another historical topic. It turned out “Alexander” was closer in
integrity to “Born on the Fourth of July”.
I would hate to think that was a reason why “Alexander” was a flop. Perhaps people prefer outrageous raping of
history as in “JFK” to bland retelling like in “Alexander”.
The movie opens with a quote
from Vergil – “Fortune favors the bold”.
However, the movie makes a stronger case that fortune favors the
sexually dysfunctional. The movie opens
like many a biographical epic by depicting the death of Alexander (Colin
Ferrell), thus preventing the terrible shock to the audience if the hero was to
die at the end. An old man, Alexander’s
friend Ptolemy, narrates from here. We
find out that Alexander was the product of squabbling parents. Philip (Val Kilmer) and Olympias (Angelina
Jolie) are in lust, but definitely not in love.
Poor little Alex. On the plus
side, he does have the greatest tutor in history (Aristotle) and the best horse
(Bucephalus). After hitting these three
points, the movie suddenly jumps to the final battle with the Persians – the
Battle of Gaugamela. Ptolemy uses a map
to get us there, but neglects to mention that two major battles and a famous
siege proceeded Gaugamela.
The Battle of Gaugamela is the
big set piece. It is epic in scale as
seen literally from an eagle eye’s view.
The battle is a mixture of accuracy, inaccuracy, and accurate, but wrong
battle. The phalanx (portrayed by 1500 trained Moroccan soldiers) is authentic
as are the weapons and equipment.
Philip’s scythed chariots are dealt with tactically using the disputed
“mousetrap” tactic. The movie shifts
from right, center, to left so it can be confusing, especially for a battle that is confusing
even for military historians. There is a
lot of “fog of war” here, or I should say “dust of war”. Alexander experts will sniff that he did not
fight on foot, his life was not saved at this battle by Cleitus (that was
Granicus), Alexander does not throw a spear at Darius III, and Darius escaped
on a horse instead of a chariot (that was Issus). Still, its an acceptable rendering of a
complicated battle.
From this peak the movie grinds
to a halt in Babylon with a lengthy discussion between Alexander and his more
than BFF Hephaestion (Jared Leto).
Hephaestion is less than thrilled when his boyfriend marries a
seductress named Roxana. The movie has
Roxane working hard to kindle Alexander’s heterosexual urges when the reality
was that Alexander was more asexual than anything else and lost interest in
Roxane soon after the marriage. She was
more of sad lamb than the determined tigress of the film.
At this point, Stone jettisons
the linear structure and begins to bounce around hitting some of the greatest
hits of Alexander lore. We get hits
like: the executions of Philotas and
Parmenion, Philip’s wedding banquet, and the killing of Cleitus. All of them are admirably accurate.
This leads up to the other big
set piece battle which is not identified but is obviously the Battle of
Hydaspes in India. For some reason
(probably to contrast with Gaugamela’s dusty plains), Stone stages this in
a jungle instead of on open ground along
a river. This is not the only dubious
decision. The elephant charge on the
phalanx is well done. The combat is
frenetic and chaotic. Alexander leads
the cavalry to the rescue when in reality the elephant-fearing horses had to be
rescued by the steady foot soldiers. The
cinematography is blood tinged and the action is surrealistic. The climax is Alexander’s duel with an
elephant which results in his and Bucephalus being wounded. In reality, Alexander took an arrow during a
later siege and he did not agree to return to Babylon because of the close call
with death. The movie concludes with
Alexander’s death.
The movie did not deserve the
critical beating it took. Some of that
was probably residual animosity towards the pompous Oliver Stone who is
actually pretty restrained here. The
task he undertook was daunting.
Alexander deserves a mini-series instead of a greatest hits
montage. And by the way, who chose to
leave out the “Gordian knot” episode?
The movie is flawed because of the overemphasis on Alexander’s
sexuality, something that would have puzzled Alexander and the Macedonians in
general. The screen time given to Roxane
and Olympias is overblown as are their depictions. Obviously Stone forced Angelina Jolie into
more than was justified (especially considering she stayed clothed).
The all-star cast is a
disappointment. Colin Ferrell is not up
to the task of portraying one of the most charismatic figures in history. The best comparison would be to Brad Pitt in
“Troy”. Pitt was much better in playing
a similar personality. Val Kilmer and
Angelina Jolie are almost stunt casting.
The sets (especially the palace in Babylon) are awesome and the costumes
match them. The score was
forgettable. The action is epic, but
there is also a lot of exposition and soap operaish moments.
Cracker? Sorry, no.
Alexander is still awaiting a great movie.
Rating - 6/10
POSTER - It does have some of the main characters featured prominently and Ferrell mimics the side profile that Alexander favored. It's a bit busy though and some of the peripherals are unclear. It does refelct the movie fairly well. Grade - B
the trailer
Roxane dance scene
I thought it was very entertaining but I agree the cast was dubious. All of them. But I liked Jared Leto. He is one of my favourite singers and never disappoints as an actor either. I prefer this to Troy. I'll rewatch them both probably and then we will see.
ReplyDeleteIn any case I wouldn't think it's top 50 or 100 material.
I agree that the story of Alexander's life would make for a great miniseries. It could double as a showcase of the ancient near East. It would require a real combination of strengths though: extensive historical research; strong funding to hire good people and create the setting; the strength of will to avoid overloading the story with sexual nonsense; and competent depiction of the wars, battles, and sieges that occur in his story.
ReplyDeleteI don't think there's a big enough audience to reward such an effort, which is a shame because if it was a hit they could immediately transition to a series about Alexander's feuding successors (working title: "Diadochi") which would be full of drama and intrigue.