“Defiance”
is an Edward Zwick (“Glory”) film that was released in 2008. Zwick was inspired by an obituary for Zus
Bielski. He based the screenplay on
Nechama Tec’s Defiance: The Bielski Partisans. The movie was made in Lithuania in a forest
about a hundred miles from the location in Belarus where the Bielskis actually
conducted their operations. The movie
was a modest success. It received an
Academy Award nomination for Best Original Score by James Newton Howard.
The
movie opens in Nazi-occupied Belarus in August, 1941. The Einsatzgrupen with help of local police
were rounding up Jews and either deporting them or executing them. Zus (Liev Schreiber) and Asael Bielski (Jamie
Bell) return home to find their parents dead, but their younger brother Aron
alive in a hiding place. They take to
the woods where they are joined by their older brother Tuvia (Daniel
Craig). A mass grave in the woods makes
it clear what the alternative to life in the forest is. The brothers are joined by refugees that are
uniformly unfit for survival away from their cushy urban lives. The first order of business for the brothers
is to take revenge against the local policeman who was responsible for the
murder of their parents. When the
hot-headed Zus learns of the death of his wife, all he wants is more revenge. A nifty ambush of a German vehicle ends in
disaster and causes Tuvia to rethink things.
Faced with the continual influx of refugees, Tuvia assumes the leadership role and
establishes a policy of putting survival above revenge. “Our revenge is to live.” Zus disagrees with this wimpiness (“You don’t
have the stomach to do what needs to be done”) and leaves to join a Russian
partisan unit led by Viktor Panchenko (Ravil Isyanov). This happens after a kick-ass fight between
Tuvia and Zus. The boys aren’t much for
talking. There are plenty of
intellectuals in the camp for that.
"I just thought of a great way to meet chicks" |
Survival
doesn’t mean forgoing everything, so each of the brothers gets a love interest. The Jews develop a concept called “forest
wives” because dudes gotta get some nookie even under dire circumstances and
even though they might be married at the time.
Leadership means having to shoot an asshole who is not only challenging
your authority, but moving in on your brother’s forest girlfriend. Tuvia goes all in on the arboreal sanctuary
concept by leading expeditions into the local ghetto to recruit more mouths to
feed. One of the newbies is a comely
lass named Lilka who provides a partner for Tuvia.
The
Bielski Brigade does its best to create a livable camp in the forest. Urbanites chip in to build the camp in a
montage, of course. The hardships
include lack of food and an outbreak of typhus.
The need for ampicilin gives Zus the opportunity to go bad-ass on a
police station. Crises develop to keep
the inhabitants from getting too complacent.
A woman violates Tuvia’s "no babies" policy. A captured German gives the camp some outlet
for all of their pent up feelings in a grim, but realistic scene. The movie spends time with Zus as he fights
with the partisans. He evolves into
quite the warrior, foreshadowing the Israeli Army.
Not all Jews went meekly |
The
Germans eventually get their act together and assault the camp. Asael leads the rearguard and Tuvia leads the
exodus. This time the sea is not parted,
but the people press on to the inevitable Hollywood set piece which includes
the cavalry arriving and a reconciliation of antagonists.
As
my readers know, I put a lot of value on war movies that bring obscure, but
worthy people and/or incidents to cinematic light. Zwick’s “Glory” did this for Robert Gould
Shaw and the 54th Massachusetts.
This effort is less successful, but still a decent achievement. Like “Glory”, “Defiance” takes some liberties
with historical truth to enhance the entertainment. The screenplay tweaks the brothers a
bit. Tuvia was the oldest and the
leader, but Asael was actually older than Zus and not the milquetoast set up
for transformation. Tuvia and Zus were
not at odds with each other. The
brothers did link up in the forest near their home, but this was after their
parents were taken away and were victims of a mass execution. The creation of the camp was well rendered
and the various hardships are authentic, if not based on actual incidents. Typhus was a problem, for instance. The
“civilian” characters in the camp are typical Hollywood stereotypes. The romances were Hollywood’s way of taking a
relationship, wiping the record clean, and reconstructing it to Hollywood
standards. Less acceptable is the Zus
arc. Although his stint with the
partisans is a nice balance to Tuvia’s camp scenes, in reality the brothers
were not separated like this. In fact,
the relationship with the partisans is melodramatized. The Bielski’s had more of a partnership with
them and often joined with them for operations.
The real Panchenko was more cooperative.
More disturbingly, the last third of the movie really abandons
veracity. Although they were forced to
flee several times, the movie composites them and adds quite a lot of violence
that did not occur. This is especially
true of the feel good ending which reminds of the conclusion of “We Were
Soldiers” in its departure from reality.
The
movie is technically sound as are Zwick films. He uses the forest location well
and the snowy environment adds to the palpable hardships the Jews have to
overcome. The strength of the film is
the acting. Craig does an excellent
job portraying the imperfections of Tuvia.
He is not a saint and he shows human weaknesses and doubts. (Some will quibble about his inconsistent accent, but I have never focued on this type of thing.) Schreiber is equally strong in a less
dimensional role, but he gets to do the cathartic stuff that is audience
pleasing. The movie wisely balances the
two characters including some well-crafted
intercutting scenes. The cast is
outstanding and the characters are intriguing.
In a refreshing divergence, the Nazis remain faceless. The potentially villainous Panchenko is
actually multidimensional and realistically represents the Soviet attitude
towards the Jews. The love interests are
strong females. In fact, another refreshing aspect of the movie is the
depiction of the Jews as survivors, not victims. This is not your typical Holocaust
movie. It is more in line with “Escape
from Sobibor”. The most memorable scene
involves the German prisoner. Talk about
cathartic.
The
weakness of the movie is its predictability.
Much of the plot developments are telegraphed. You know someone will get pregnant in spite
of the "no babies" policy, for instance.
The themes are trite. Do you have
to become a monster to fight monsters?
The movie answers no. Community is
important. Everyone has a role to
play. When you are knocked down, pick yourself
up and start over. Life goes on. The movie is basically a collection of
aphorisms, but that’s okay because those themes deserve to be emphasized.
I
have not mentioned the action yet. It is
quite good. There are several graphic
action sequences that are in the recent war movie cinematography style. The assault on the police station in
particular uses stop action (six frames per second) to a cool effect. It is noteworthy that the movie realistically
depicts how it ain’t that easy to hit a target in combat.
Overall,
I have to give the movie a positive review.
It is not in a league with “Glory”, but it tells an important story in
an entertaining, if overly Hollywoodized way.
There is a nice blend of character development, drama, and action. But most importantly, how many people had
heard of the Bielski brothers before this movie gave them the fame they
deserved? I know I had never heard of
them. I am thankful to Hollywood for
that and for the motivation to read more about them. Movies can be educational as well as
entertaining and historical movies can inspire us to learn more.
GRADE
= B
the trailer
HISTORY
or HOLLYWOOD: Defiance
1.
The Bielski farm was raided by Nazis
and their parents were murdered.
2.
Tuvia returns home to reunite with his
three brothers.
3.
Tuvia breaks into a collaborating cops home
and kills him for his role in the deaths of his parents.
4.
The brothers establish a camp in the
woods where Jewish refugees flow in to join them.
5.
The brothers begin to ambush
collaborators and Germans.
6.
Tuvia takes command and forbids
revenge killings and wanton looting.
7.
All three of the brothers take “forest
wives”.
8.
They have to flee because the camp is
ratted out by a local.
9.
They form an uneasy relationship with
Russian partisans led by Panchenko.
10.
Zus disagrees with Tuvia’s policy of
survival over revenge so he joins the partisans.
11.
Tuvia visits the ghetto to recruit
more people.
12.
Tuvia kills his horse for food.
13.
Because typhus is a problem, Zus leads
a raid on a police station to acquire drugs.
14.
Tuvia’s policy of sharing the food
equally leads to a coup attempt that Tuvia deals with by shooting the ring
leader.
15.
When a German soldier is captured, the
Jews execute him by mob.
16.
Tuvia forbids pregnancies.
17.
The camp comes under attack and they
have to cross a swamp to reach safety.
18.
Upon reaching dry ground, the Jews
defeat a German unit with a tank with the help of Zus’ partisan buddies.
THE ANSWERS
1.
The Bielski farm was raided by Nazis and their
parents were murdered. Histywood The Bielski’s owned a mill. The parents were taken away and died in a
mass execution and were interred in a mass grave. Aron was hiding behind a tree when the arrest
was made.
2.
Tuvia returns home to reunite with his
three brothers. History Tuvia returns to find his three brothers
living in the woods. Tuvia brought with
him the woman he had hooked up with after leaving his wife with her family when
she refused to go with him. Azael was
actually the second oldest and had been the head of the family after their
father had entered semi-retirement.
3.
Tuvia breaks into a collaborating cops home
and kills him for his role in the deaths of his parents. Histywood
The brothers and two partisans broke into a policeman’s house at
dinnertime to acquire weapons. The man
was turned over to the local partisan unit headed by a man named Gromov. Gromov gave them some weapons and suggested
they form a unit. They ended up calling
their unit the “Marshal Zhukov group”.
4.
The brothers establish a camp in the
woods where Jewish refugees flow in to join them. History
At first, it was just relatives.
The movie accurately indicates that the brothers were mainly interested
in saving as many Jews as possible.
5.
The brothers begin to ambush
collaborators and Germans. History
6.
Tuvia takes command and forbids
revenge killings and wanton looting.
History Actually Tuvia was voted
on as leader. He did control the looting
in attempts not to alienate the local population, however they still
occasionally demanded food at gunpoint.
7.
All three of the brothers take “forest
wives”. Histywood The concept is accurately portrayed and all
three brothers did find mates, but the mates were inaccurately depicted. Tuvia’s “companion” Sonia was killed when a
house she was sheltering in was raided.
He then “married” a woman named Lilka who was 17. She had a crush on him from before the war. Azael married Haya. They also had known each other before the
war. Zus did marry a woman named Sonia,
but he was the initiator of the relationship. There are many who believe the brothers used their position to take advantage of women.
8.
They have to flee because the camp is
ratted out by a local. Histywood They had to flee several times for a variety
of reasons, but not specifically because of this.
9.
They form an uneasy relationship with
Russian partisans led by Panchenko.
Histywood Panchenko was an actual
person, but he was only 20 years old when they first met him. At
first he was suspicious of the Bielski’s because of rumors that they were
looting. An investigation proved these
accusations were unfounded and after that the relationship was cordial.
10.
Zus disagrees with Tuvia’s policy of
survival over revenge so he joins the partisans. Hollywood
The brothers seldom disagreed on policies. Zus did not leave the camp to join the partisans. In fact, their unit often conducted sabotage
and ambush missions with Panchenko’s unit.
11.
Tuvia visits the ghetto to recruit
more people. Histywood Tuvia did believe there was strength in
numbers (one of the few things Azael and Zus disagreed with him about), but he
did not go into the ghetto himself. He
sent in messages encouraging Jews to leave and then sent men to guide the
refugees out. Most of them left through
a tunnel, not a hole in a wall.
12.
Tuvia kills his horse for food. Histywood
This incident happened with a different group of Jews.
13.
Because typhus is a problem, Zus leads
a raid on a police station to acquire drugs. Hollywood Typhus was a problem, but the raid was added
for action.
14.
Tuvia’s policy of sharing the food
equally leads to a coup attempt that Tuvia deals with by shooting the ring
leader. Hollywood Tuvia actually had a policy of giving food
priority to the men who went on missions to get it. He did shoot an insubordinate follower, but
it was not over food.
15.
When a German soldier is captured, the
Jews execute him by mob. Histywood A similar incident occurred in a different
camp.
16.
Tuvia forbids pregnancies. Hollywood
I found no evidence of this.
17.
The camp comes under attack and they
have to cross a swamp to reach safety.
History This happened, but they
left before the camp came under attack.
There was no rearguard action as shown in the film.
18.
Upon reaching dry ground, the Jews
defeat a German unit with a tank with the help of Zus’ partisan buddies. Hollywood
There was no kick Nazi ass, happy ending with redemption for Zus. Zus was with them the whole time.
POST SCRIPT:
At this point, they set up a camp on an “island” in the swamp, but they
were beset by food shortages and the area was surrounded by hostile
forces. Zus led a breakout by eighty
fighters and they led the way back to the previous camp. Later, the Soviets conscripted Zus and the
combatants to join their partisans and Azael was forced into a staff position. Only Tuvia remained in the camp to lead the
noncombatants.
Nice review. It's been years since I've seen Defiance, but it didn't leave much impression on me. Seemed very generic at the time. Maybe a rewatch would improve my opinion.
ReplyDeleteProbably not. I find there are too many war movies I have not seen yet to waste time watching a movie again that I had not liked the first time.
Deletewhat sources did you use
ReplyDeleteThe Bielski Brothers by Peter Duffy.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete