“The Water Diviner” is an
Australian/American production that was a vanity project for Russell
Crowe. He made his directorial debut with
the film. It was loosely based on the
eponymous book by Andrew Anastasios and Dr. Meaghan Wilson-Anastasios. The movie was “inspired by true events” which
means that the Anastasios’ grew a mighty oak out of a story about an old
Australian man who came to Turkey to search for his son’s grave. Their research did not find any facts about
the mystery man, but they still wrote a novel based on it. And then someone decided to make a movie inspired
by the fictional book.
The movie opens during the Gallipoli
Campaign in 1915. A Turkish attack
across no man’s land gives us combatus interruptus when they reach the ANZAC
trenches because the Australians have withdrawn. Meanwhile back in Australia four years later,
Joshua Conner (Crowe) is finding water and digging a well. Conner is a water diviner (or dowser). (Water divining is a pseudoscience that
usually involves the use of a Y or L shaped stick or rod to locate underground
water.) It has been four years since his three sons were killed in the war at
Gallipoli. His wife has gone insane and
blames him for losing their kids. “You
can find water, but you can’t find your own children. You lost them.” If you were hoping this would be a laugh
riot… The movie uses flashbacks to fill
in the boys’ arc. They left for the war
like every other Australian volunteer – enthusiastically. They ended up in the Dardanelles where no one
kept their enthusiasm very long.
Conner promises his wife he will
bring the boys’ home so it’s off to Turkey.
There he meets a street urchin and his comely mom Ayshe (Olga
Kurylenko). A rather predictable romance
ensues. She helps him get to the area
where his sons died. The ANZACs are in
the process of disinterring bodies and don’t want some meddlesome father poking
his nose in. Clicheish military
bureaucracy blocks humanism every time in cinema. However, Conner meets a sympathetic Turkish
Major Hasan (Yilmaz Erdogan) who wants to help (so the Turkish reputation in
Australia can be ameliorated). He could
be a bit guilt-ridden because he might have been responsible for the boys’
deaths. (Literally, in one case.) We find out about those deaths via
flashback. Apparently the Australian
army had a policy of getting brothers killed together. Or were they all killed? Hasan thinks one of them might have been
taken captive and could still be alive.
That would be great for Australio-Turkish relations and for the
audience’s desire to leave the theater with a glow. Hasan is willing to help Conner if Conner is
willing to tag along for the defeating of a Greek invasion. Hey audience, would a train ambush wake you
up? As far as finding the son who felt
no need to inform his poor mom that he is still alive, Conner will have to use
his paternal instincts. Not to worry, he
has an inner divining rod.
“The Water Diviner” is a
mediocre movie. I can imagine Crowe
saying “I did not realize directing was so difficult” and “man, that leading
man is a dick to work with”. Actually,
his debut is competent. He throws in
some showy overhead shots. The nonlinear
structure works well. He gets a good
performance out of himself, but the rest of the cast is middling. The romance between Crowe and Kurylenko is a
fizzle. They have little chemistry. The romance is also lamely predictable. Not only is it obvious from the moment they
meet that they are destined, but the screenplay throws in the trope of the
outsider rescuing the damsel from her culture’s unenlightened treatment of
women. In fact, the script is not just
in full foreshadowing mode for the romance.
Although it starts depressing, it quickly shifts to marching towards a
happy ending. There are some twists
along the way, but they are manipulative.
Unrealistic things have to happen to get to happily ever after. It is more of an after-war movie than a war
movie. The action is limited in scope,
but leaves you wanting more. Certainly
the movie could have used more. Most of
the movie is like Conner – passionless.
The movie is not strong historically. Anyone who does not research the facts could
conclude that it is fairly close to a true story. Although the narrative is predictable and the
characters are stereotyped, the story is not totally unbelievable. Other than the part where Edward does not
bother to contact his grieving parents.
And the part where Conner locates him through his fatherly instinct. The movie is centered on the Gallipoli
Campaign and it assumes we know the history of the campaign. This is problematic with American
audiences. Unless you have seen
“Gallipoli”, you probably have little knowledge that the boys were pawns in a
disastrous British gambit to invade the Ottoman Empire to knock it out of the
Central Powers. The landing quickly got
bogged down and the Turkish defenses proved unbreakable. The ANZAC forces suffered heavily before the
campaign was mercifully abandoned. This
event became the leading exemplar in Australia of the futility of warfare and
the ill use of its young men in the Great War. The film has a revisionist theme. It intends to show the Turkish perspective. As Crowe mentioned in an interview, the Turks
were defending their country. He goes
out of his way to make the Turks sympathetic.
Hasan is a character that probably could not have existed in an
Australian movie in the 20th Century. Mission accomplished as the movie was popular
in Turkey. It did not do well overall at
the box office, however. It was not
helped by the controversy involving what was considered a too positive take on
the Turks. Critics brought up the
Armenian and Assyrian Genocides of 1915.
There may have been Hasans, but he was not representative.
Australia has a reputation for
bringing war movie lovers some good fare.
“The Water Diviner” is not one of its better offerings. Since war movies are rare these days, it is
something of a disappointment. It
certainly does not live up to Mel Gibson’s “Gallipoli”. But then, Gibson did not direct that
movie. Crowe should get credit for
making a movie on a subject that he had a passion for, but the story is just
not very strong. As a war movie, it does
not deliver the action. As a romance, it
is ho hum. And as a mystery, it’s
mediocre.
GRADE
= C
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please fell free to comment. I would love to hear what you think and will respond.