Netflix
recently blessed us with a war movie. I
originally got Netflix so I could watch an enormous amount of war movie
DVDs. Then Netflix started streaming
some war movies. And now, they are
making some war movies! We are truly
living in a golden age. Not counting
everything else. “Outlaw / King” was
co-written, produced, and directed by David MacKenzie (“Hell or High
Water”). It was filmed in Scotland and
England. The movie premiered at the
Toronto International Film Festival.
After that, MacKenzie cut twenty minutes.
The movie
leads with the claim that it is “based on historical events”. It starts in Scotland in 1304. Title cards inform us non-Scots that the
Scots had recently rebelled against the occupation of King Edward I. This rebellion was led by William
Wallace. But Wallace has been defeated
and now the Scottish lords are prepared to submit to Edward. At the siege of Stirling Castle, Robert the Bruce
(Chris Pine) joins other nobles in witnessing Edward’s triumph (facilitated by
one bad-ass trebuchet hurling Greek fire) and then bending their knees. Edward forces Robert to patch things up with
John Comyn. Exiting the tent, Robert is
challenged to a frenemy duel by Prince Edward (Billy Howle). Clanging within five minutes! This is a good sign. The king arranges a marriage between Robert
and the daughter of a loyal ally.
Elizabeth (Florence Pugh) is comely, but Robert is either a gentleman or
doesn’t like the political strings. I
couldn’t tell which. But I could tell that
this separate rooms situation would not last. (That’s right, I’ve seen a movie.) Her
feistiness will overcome his frostiness.
Just like his patriotism is going to overcome his placating. If you are Scottish, you know where this is
heading and are wondering how it will be depicted. If you are an American, you are wondering how
kick-ass the battles will be and whether the movie will live up to
“Braveheart”.
Let’s get
this over with immediately. It is not as
good as “Braveheart”, as
entertainment. Chris Pine plays Robert
as lacking charisma. He does have the
saintly demeanor of Wallace. Except when
he murders his rival in a church of all places.
But he was justified and the clergy backed him, so keep cheering. The romance with Elizabeth should not scare
away the guys. In fact, when they
finally consummate, there is some Netflix Original nudity for both male and
female viewers. Florence Pugh is fine
(both acting and body wise) as Elizabeth, but Pine doesn’t seem to be having
much fun. That might be appropriate
because for the first three fourths of the movie, I wouldn’t give this guy’s
problems to a monkey on a rock. The
movie definitely sets him up as a massive underdog against the all-powerful
Edward (Stephen Dillane). Unfortunately,
those twenty cut minutes must have dealt with how he climbed out of the pit of
despair. The movie jumps from spider
legend (you Scots will know what I am talking about) to rousing combat porn
finale in the blink of an eye. And then
slaps on the obligatory romantic reunion.
The happily-ever-afters kick in pre-Bannockburn. Maybe that’s where the twenty minutes were.
“Outlaw /
King” does not really engage the viewer.
The events are depicted without panache and Pine’s performance does not
add spice. To balance his morose
portrayal, the charismatic James Douglas gets scene-chewing portrayal by Aaron
Taylor-Johnson. Black Douglas deserves
his own movie. The battle scenes are the
highlights and they are very graphic. Basically they are the melee style that
you see in every modern medieval movie.
There is also a drawing and quartering to remind of “Braveheart” and top
it grossness-wise. Speaking of which,
this is in some ways a sequel to that film.
Someone must have wanted to redeem Robert. And Edward and his son. King Edward here is less supervillain and
more Machiavellian medieval king. Dillane’s
Edward is much closer to the real Edward. You will not recognize his son. I am guessing that the real Prince Edward was
somewhere between flaming and enflaming.
The movie makes a big mistake not concentrating on Valence as the main villain.
It turns out
(see below for details) the movie is fairly accurate. Certainly more than “Braveheart”, but what
isn’t. It tries hard to get the period
details right. There is a lot of
mud. Politics are also dirty. Love will survive. Scotland has some awesome scenery. This all enfolds in an acceptably
entertaining way. I don’t want to
discourage Netflix from making more war movies and I did learn a lot about a
great warrior. It turns out he is not
the weasel “Braveheart” left us with.
SPOILER
ALERT! HISTORICAL ACCURACY: (Keep in
mind that I am not Scottish, so I may be off in some of this analysis.) The movie starts in 1304 at the siege of
Sterling Castle. Nice touch having the
huge trebuchet. It was called Warwolf
and was reputedly the largest trebuchet in history. It is true that Edward postponed accepting
the surrender until he could use it. It seems
unlikely it hurled Greek fire. It did
lob up to 300 pound rocks. Edward did
accept submission of the Scottish nobles at this time and Robert would have
been one of them. However, he had been
on board for some time and (as “Braveheart” depicted) was basically allied with
him. Robert had a tense relationship with
John Comyn. Both wanted to be King of
Scotland. Comyn was the most powerful
noble in Scotland and had more support due to his having been more consistently
anti-British. The movie downplays that
Robert was less than patriotic before he rebelled. Robert tried to broker an agreement with Comyn
where Comyn would accept Robert as King in exchange for some concessions. Apparently, Comyn ratted the Bruce out to Edward
and Robert was forced to flee from the King’s court. He returned to Scotland and arranged a
meeting with Comyn. The meeting was
similar to what is depicted in the movie, except that Robert would have already
known of Comyn’s duplicity, plus the murder may have been more due to the rivalry
for power.
After the
murder (for such it was), Robert rushed to Bishop Wishart for absolution and
the clergy came on board for the rebellion.
(Robert was excommunicated by the Pope.) He was hastily crowned king. Robert’s rebellion was not really a response
to Wallace’s death (since he was hardly a fan), but more the result of seeing
the hand-writing on the wall with regard to Edward becoming increasingly
suspicious of Robert. Robert was already
married to Elizabeth (since 1302) and although her father was an ally of Edward,
I found no evidence that it was a political marriage. (I don’t think Robert waited to consummate.) Robert had a daughter named Marjory from his
first marriage.
The Battle of
Methven is fairly close to reality. Robert
did face Valence (Earl of Pembroke) who was Edward’s military commander in
Scotland. He was sent with the vanguard
and it was he that Edward instructed to raise the dragon banner. The Prince followed later with the main army. The Prince did take the Oath of the Swans, so
that bizarre moment was reality! Rpbert
and Valence did meet the afternoon before and agreed to wait to the next
day. They did not agree to a duel. Valence surprise attacked at dawn, but it was
less perfidy than just taking advantage of Robert’s unbelievable lack of sentries
or scouts. It was a massed cavalry
attack and probably did not involve fire arrows.
Robert escaped
the disaster with around 500 men. Along
the road they encountered Jack Douglas as shown in the movie. The movie does a good job showing Edward
dissing Douglas earlier. Douglas had petitioned
for return of his lands, but when Edward learned who his father was, he threw
him out. The movie does a pretty good
job with the Battle of Dalrigh which was when the MacDougalls ambushed Robert. It was in a field, not on the shore. According to legend, things were so hairy
that at one point Robert avoided being dragged from his horse only by loosening
his brooch and giving up his cloak. This
marked the low ebb as Robert sent his wife and daughter to KIldrummy
Castle. However, when the castle was
besieged, she was no longer there. She was
captured at St. Dulhoc by the Earl of Ross who gave her to Edward. Robert’s brother Niall was captured at
Kildrummy and drawn and quartered, but not by Prince Edward. The spider incident occurred during this
period when Robert was on the run and taking refuge in caves, etc. Supposedly he witnessed a spider trying several
times to complete a web and recognized the moral of “if at first you don’t
succeed”.
Robert inaugurated
a guerrilla war that consisted of hit and run attacks. He retook his own home and Douglas captured
his own castle in the Douglas Larder incident where he and a small group of men
slaughtered the garrison in the chapel. Meanwhile,
Elizabeth and Marjory were being held under house arrest. Marjory was sent to a nunnery and Elizabeth
was moved around periodically. She never
spent any time in a wooden cage, but this did happen to one of Robert’s
sisters. Robert built up his support
with his successes in the guerrilla war and was ready to take on the king’s
forces. He faced off again with Valence
at the Battle of Loudoun Hill. The Prince was not there. The movie reenactment is acceptable. Robert
did take advantage of marshy ground to funnel the British cavalry into his
pikes and ditches. Obviously, there was
no duel at the end. Edward I actually
died after this battle. Elizabeth was
not reunited with Robert until 1314.
CONCLUSION: My first take was
that the movie was a misfire, but after looking at the history I am a little
more forgiving. Not that it is perfect
historically. It takes some major liberties,
but most are artistic license that make sense.
I was particularly impressed with the inclusion of the Warwolf, the Oath
of the Swans, and the Douglas Larder incident.
The three battles are fun and surprisingly accurate. I abhor “Braveheart” and was hoping this
movie would prove that a great movie could be made about the First War of
Scottish Independence. “Outlaw / King”
is not a great movie. But it is a war
movie and it tries hard.
GRADE = B-
"I wouldn’t give this guy’s problems to a monkey on a rock."
ReplyDeleteThat was an analogy that I had to stop and think through. I'm not entirely sure I made it out to the other side, though.
It's a shame that Pine played the part with so much restraint. I tend to compare Pine to James Cagney in body posture, and it sounds like a performance with Cagney's typical energy and good-natured optimism would have been a good fit for the story (though maybe not for historical accuracy).