It's the anniversary of D-Day in Canada, too. “Storming
Juno” is a Canadian war movie about the Canadian army storming Juno beach on
D-Day. It was directed by Tim
Wolochatiuk on a shoe string. It follows
three soldiers: a paratrooper, an
infantryman, and a tanker. The movie has
a docudrama feel to it, but there are no talking heads. It is “based on real characters and events.”
The
movie leads with the paratrooper. He is
part of the 1st Canadian Paratrooper Battalion. The film uses archival footage to coincide
with his background information. His
unit’s mission is to take out an artillery battery. The infantryman is in the first wave of the amphibious
landing. “Juno was one of the most
heavily fortified sectors of Hitler’s Atlantic Wall.” You won’t be able to tell that from this
movie, however. He is not concerned with
that since “given the naval bombardment, chances are nothing will be left.” That’s an accurate feeling of
over-optimism. Juno is going to be a
tough nut to crack considering that theirs is the only landing craft. The landing is far from “Saving Private
Ryan”, but there is some slo-mo and hand-held.
The deaths are random. One of the soldiers fires a mortar by holding it
against a tree and firing it like a bazooka!
Now, here comes the tank. The
effects are decidedly cheesy. It duels
with a bunker. The tank is alone and
without infantry support. The tactics in
the movie are shaky. There are several
head-scratching moments in the movie. Twice
characters enter enemy positions alone, for instance.
The
movie’s makers had a legitimate reason for wanting to recognize the Canadian
effort on D-Day. How many people outside
Canada even know that they were part of the invasion? And Canadians deserved a movie highlighting
their heroism. After all, what else do they have? The movie accomplishes its mission in a low
budget way. It is not overly
patriotic. As a teacher, I can vouch for
the fact that its intended audience prefers reenactments to historians talking
about the historical event. The problem
is the cheesiness of the production.
Although the CGI is acceptable, the story it backs is low rent. The decision to follow three character arcs
was a good one, but there is little character development. Their voices sound similar so the narration
can be confusing. When they are speaking
in character, the banter is lame. There
is no cursing. But maybe that’s because
Canadians don’t curse. The actors are
amateurish, but not embarrassing. They
get lots of closeups. The movie is very
macro. You may learn about Juno Beach,
but you will not get the impression that it was arduous. It was a beautiful day and so quiet. The movie does do a decent job on
deaths. They are not too theatrical and
although not graphic, the wounds are realistic.
That is very unusual for a movie like this, so kudos.
“Storming
Juno” is a sincere effort and should be seen by Canadians. It has a following and I have to assume they
are all Canadians because the movie is nothing special. Actually, the documentary after the film
entitled “Remembering Juno” is better than the movie. It makes me wonder why they didn’t reenact
the real stories? One of the veterans
talks about killing prisoners and another describes targeting a church steeple
where a sniper was. This latter would
have been an improvement over the clicheish sniper incident depicted in the
movie.
I
recommend “Storming Juno”, but only if you stick around for the
documentary. Or if you are a Canadian.
You can go here if you want to see my list of other D-Day movies.
GRADE
= C
Canada also played a HUGE role in the Battle of the Atlantic. With Canada, Australia, New Zealand and India to depend upon for troops and resources, I don't believe Germany ever really had a chance in beating the United Kingdom even if the US hadn't entered the war. Germany just didn't have the resources to compete.
ReplyDeleteI agree Canada played an important role, but I don't see the UK winning without the U.S.
DeleteBy ‘42 Australia was too busy in New Guinea to be of much help to Britain
ReplyDelete