Showing posts with label anti-war movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-war movement. Show all posts

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Born on the 4th of July

I thought it would be appropriate with the developing scandal involving VA hospitals to review the best movie depicting treatment of wounded veterans.  Anyone familiar with the history of the treatment of American veterans since the Vietnam War could not have been surprised at this scandal.  When it first broke, my reaction was "no shit".  How pitiful that politicians profess to be shocked, shocked at what was happening.  How pitiful that some politicians want us to believe it is a recent (i.e., Obama) development.  I guess they have never seen "Born on the Fourth of July".



                “Born on the 4th of July” is the second in Oliver Stone’s Vietnam trilogy.  It was released in 1989.  It is sandwiched between “Platoon” and “Heaven and Earth”.  The film shares eleven actors with “Platoon”.  It is based on the memoir by Ron Kovic who wrote the script with Stone.  Interestingly, the two veterans both won Bronze Stars and Purple Hearts.  Stone also produced and directed the film.  It was a huge success at the box office and with critics.  It was nominated for eight Oscars and won for Director and Film Editing.

                The movie opens symbolically with a young Kovic playing war – an American rite of passage.  This flows into a 4th of July parade featuring crippled veterans (including the real Kovic).  The crowd is very appreciative of the WWII veterans.  Next, we hear JFK urge young Americans to “Ask not…”  This trio of images establishes the template of pre-disillussioned America.  (Interestingly, the Kennedy of this film is urging young American boys to go to Vietnam whereas the Kennedy of Stone's "JFK" is killed for wanting us out!)

                Kovic is recruited by the Marines and seduced by the desire to “find out if you got what it takes.”  He doesn’t want to miss the chance to go toe to toe with Communism.   In a twist, his veteran father (Raymond Barry) is not thrilled, but his mother (Caroline Kava) is supportive.

                The movie jumps forward to Kovic’s second tour in Vietnam.  His unit is attacking a village and find a whole family slaughtered.  The combat is visceral and graphic.  In the chaotic retreat, Kovic accidentally kills one of his men named Wilson.  When he tries to accept responsibility, his CO brushes the incident under the rug.  This adds to Kovic’s anguish and creates an ominous vibe.  Sure enough, in the next combat set piece, Kovic is badly wounded in the assault on another ville.  The action is intense and frenetic.  Both scenes evidence the “fog of war”.  Tragically, the military hospital is more hellish.  He is given last rites, but survives to end up in the Bronx Veterans’ Hospital.

                The hospital is like Purgatory.  Viewers eyes are opened to how our warriors were treated by the system they fought for.  Rats, filth, uncaring staff, drug abuse, faulty equipment.  (This makes it even more damning that some similar examples of mistreatment greeted veterans of Iraq!)  In spite of this, Kovic remains a hawk and rails against anti-war protestors.  “Love it or leave it!”  Kovic also retains his misplaced confidence that he will walk again.  A broken leg ends his optimism and begins his descent into depression.


                His return home does not slow the descent.  The family is dysfunctional with an anti-war brother to quarrel with and a mother who cannot deal with the broken copy of her golden boy.  The movie comes full circle with another 4th of July parade.  Although predictable with its hippies causing trouble, the scene is a great bookend.  Even the requisite PTSD flinching at the fireworks and the failed speech with flashbacks do not feel clicheish.

                The worm turns when Kovic is caught up in a protest at Syracuse University.  During a speech by Abbie Hoffman, the police wade into the crowd with tear gas and billy clubs. This leads to a drunken rant against his mother and the heart-rending “who’s gonna love me, dad?”  He has to leave home now. 

                The third stage of his life takes him to a seedy town in Mexico inhabited by other  mentally and physically damaged veterans.  It’s a life of frustrated whoring and binge drinking.  Kovic poignantly falls in love with a “whore with a heart of gold”  only to discover it’s just a job to her.  He leaves this “home” with his friend Charlie (Willem Dafoe) only to end up at rock bottom in a wheel chair fight on a deserted highway.  It’s more powerful than pathetic.

"Well, I believe after Americans see our movie,
wounded veterans will be treated with respect!"
                The fourth stage begins with a soul-cleansing visit to Wilson’s family to tell them the truth about their son’s death.  Their reaction is genuine and sincere and very Middle American.  The weight has been lifted and Kovic begins his career as  fixture in the anti-war movement.  The climax of this evolution from naïve patriot to patriotic dissenter comes at the 1972 Republican Convention where Kovic and others disrupt Nixon’s speech and get violently throw out of the hall.

                Here’s a cliché for you;  “I’m not a big Tom Cruise (Oliver Stone) fan, but…”  How often do you hear that?  This is one of those movies where both men are at their best.  I had not seen it in years and did not look forward to reviewing it with relish.  I was wrong.  It is a very impressive movie.  There are few weaknesses.  Stone controls himself (you know how he can be) and deserved the Oscar as Best Director.  It is astounding that the movie lost to “Driving Miss Daisy”.  You can definitely argue this was more egregious than the infamous “Shakespeare in Love” win over “Saving Private Ryan”.  The cinematography of Robert Richardson mixes chromes to match the moods.  For instance, the combat scenes have reddish tinge.  (It lost to “Glory”.)  The two combat scenes stand out for me, of course.  Richardson uses a hand-held and gets the you-are-there feel that has become common in modern war films.  The soundtrack by John Williams was also nominated (losing to “The Little Mermaid”!)

War
                The acting is outstanding.  Cruise is amazing and must have finished second to Daniel Day-Lewis.  He is fully into a role that took great physical commitment.  Leave your feelings about him at the door and admire his performance.  The other standout is Defoe.  Their scenes together are highlights.
"Give me that Oscar!"
                .  In less capable hands, the movie could have been maudlin and heavy-handed.  Stone is obviously sending a message, but he does not bludgeon us with it.  The theme is simple: the evolution of a patriotic warrior to a disillusioned pacifist.  The arc is realistic mainly because it’s a true story.  Kovic’s role in the production gives it cred.  It makes it difficult to doubt the accuracy.  However, the two protest scenes (Syracuse and the Convention) are
 up-violenced for understandable reasons.  These are not major flaws.

                  Although Stone struck out with “Heaven and Earth”, the first two in his trilogy are important films.  “Platoon” has lost luster for many war movie fans (not me), but the fact is that it opened the Vietnam combat experience to many Americans.  It is not the only Vietnam film that has done a credible job in this area.  On the other hand, “Born” opened people’s eyes to the plight of wounded veterans.  This depiction is rarer with the inferior “Coming Home” the obvious competitor.  The sad thing is the limited impact it had on treatment of future veterans.  It also should be mentioned that the movie did the service of bringing Ron Kovic to public recognition.  For the Vietnam War, it is appropriate that we get a crippled, but resilient hero to replace Col. Kirby of “The Green Berets” (a movie that is the polar opposite of this movie).

 Grade  =  A

HISTORY or HOLLYWOOD

1.       Kovic was on the high school wrestling team and lost in a championship match.

2.       He decided to enter the Marines after Marine recruiters came to talk to him and his classmates.

3.       His unit opened fire on a vollage without just cause.  Many civilaians were casualties in one particular hut.  They had to pull back when the enemy counterattacked.  In the confusion, Kovic shot and killed an American named Wilson who came running toward him.

4.       When he tried to report the friendly fire incident, his commanding officer did not want to hear about it.

5.       Kovic was wounded during an assault on a village.  He was first hit in the foot and then in the shoulder while returning fire.

6.       He spent several months In a Bronx Veterans hospital that was noted for rats, faulty equipment, uncaring personnel, and unsanitary conditions.

7.       Kovic was told he would never walk again but he worked hard at it until he broke his leg.

8.       He returns home in a wheelchair.  He is offered a job as a cashier by his friend who had refused to join the military.

9.       He rides in the 4th of July parade and has a flashback while giving a speech.

10.    Kovic goes to Syracuse University to see Donna (his unrequited love) and gets roughed up when he attends an anti-war rally that is broken up by the police.

11.    He starts drinking heavily and has a falling out with his mother.  He goes to join other crippled veterans in Mexico.  There he meets Charlie and has an affair with a whore who he erroneously feels is in love with him.

12.    He visits Wilson’s family and they accept his apology.

13.    Kovic joins the Vietnam Veterans Against the War and goes to the Republican Convention in Miami.  He speaks to the press in the hall during Nixon’s acceptance speech.  He is thrown out and arrested, but is rescued by other vets and leads a counterattack.

14.    He is invited to the Democratic Convention in 1976 and gives a speech.

Okay, so what are the correct answers?  Keep in mind that Kovic co-wrote the script and may have added some things that actually happened, but did not appear in the book.  But also keep in mind the other script writer was Stone.

1.       Kovic was on the high school wrestling team and lost in a championship match.  Histywood  Kovic was on the wrestling team, but the memoir does not mention the match portrayed in the movie.

2.       He decided to enter the Marines after Marine recruiters came to talk to him and his classmates.  History

3.       His unit opened fire on a village without just cause.  Many civilians were casualties in one particular hut.  They had to pull back when the enemy counterattacked.  In the confusion, Kovic shot and killed an American named Wilson who came running toward him.  History  Both incidents occurred pretty much as depicted in the film, but they were two separate incidents. The attack that resulted in the civilian casualties did not end with an enemy counterattack.  The wounded civilians were medevaced, not abandoned as in the film.  The killing of Wilson occurred on a patrol and it was at night.

4.       When he tried to report the friendly fire incident, his commanding officer did not want to hear about it.  History

5.       Kovic was wounded during an assault on a village.  He was first hit in the foot and then in the shoulder while returning fire.  History

6.       He spent several months In a Bronx Veterans hospital that was noted for rats, faulty equipment, uncaring personnel, and unsanitary conditions.  History

7.       Kovic was told he would never walk again but he worked hard at it until he broke his leg.  Histywood  He did attempt to walk again, but the broken leg occurred after he left the hospital and was in college.

8.       He returns home in a wheelchair.  He is offered a job as a cashier by his friend who had refused to join the military.  Histywood  Kovic does return home similar to the movie, but the book does not mention the friend (Steve Boyer in the movie) who was a pacifist/capitalist.

9.       He rides in the 4th of July parade and has a flashback while giving a speech.  Histywood  Kovic did ride in the parade, but he was with another disabled vet.  He was on the grandstand, but did not give a speech.  Tommy Law did come up and take him away afterwards.

10.    Kovic goes to Syracuse University to see Donna (his unrequited love) and gets roughed up when he attends an anti-war rally that is broken up by the police.  Hollywood  He does not mention Donna in the book.  He was attending college when he went to a peace rally, but he listened from his car.  Later he went to a demonstration in Washington, DC with a friend named Skip.  They ended at the Reflecting Pool where the police waded into the waders.  The violence was similar to that of the film with Skip wheeling him away to the Lincoln Memorial.  He was not himself attacked.  In the book, this is the incident that made him a militant. 

11.    He starts drinking heavily and has a falling out with his mother.  He goes to join other crippled veterans in Mexico.  There he meets Charlie and has an affair with a whore who he erroneously feels is in love with him.  Histywood  The book does not dwell on his relationship with his mother, the movie probably exaggerated this dynamic.  He did go to Mexico and live with a community of veterans in a town known as the Village of the Sun.  One of his friends was named Charlie and the incident with the taxi was true.  After this he went back to the States and then broke his leg and spent six months in a hospital.  Although he slept around with a lot of prostitutes in Mexico, there was no relationship like depicted in the film.

12.    He visits Wilson’s family and they accept his apology.  Hollywood

13.    Kovic joins the Vietnam Veterans Against the War and goes to the Republican Convention in Miami.  He speaks to the press in the hall during Nixon’s acceptance speech.  He is thrown out and arrested, but is rescued by other vets and leads a counterattack.  Histywood  Kovic had moved to California and was living with a friend named Kenny when he attended a meeting of the VVAW.  He started giving speeches and appearing on TV.  The arresting by an undercover cop masquerading as a veteran occurred at a different protest and he did end up in jail.  At the Convention, he was interviewed on the floor by Roger Mudd, but it was before the Nixon speech.  He was removed during the Nixon speech for yelling anti-war slogans.

14.    He is invited to the Democratic Convention in 1976 and gives a speech.  History
Accuracy Rating  =  .64
                All things considered, "Born on the Fourth of July" is admirably accurate.  Some of the
       inaccuracies are designed to advance the themes and since Kovic had a hand in the production, we can assume he was okay with the liberties Stone took.  Of course, this does not excuse inventing a character like Donna.  It is more acceptable to combine some incidents for time and plot purposes.  The biggest strength of the movie accuracy-wise is Cruise's portrayal of Kovic.  The Kovic of the movie is the Kovic of the film.  Cruise channels Kovic and the extreme emotions Kovic writes about in his book are apparent in the film. 
BOOK vs. MOVIE
                  I should remind my readers that I am a strong believer that a movie should be better than the book it is based upon. The screenwriter has the luxury of taking the best elements of the book and then making whatever improvements to enhance the entertainment value of the story.  Unless the book is such that the director can not replicate it due to technical, budgetary, or time constraints, the movie should be better than the book.  In this case, I am going to call it a tie because although the movie is an outstanding rendering of the book, the book is more personal and passionate than the movie.  The book is more likely to get under your skin.  Also, the book is surprisingly more formalistic than the movie.  The book is nonlinear.  It skips between first and third person (sometimes within the same chapter).  There are parts where Kovic speaks in stream of consciousness - something movies have a hard time depicting.  The book has the luxury of developing the theme of a broken and unfulfilled life without being too maudlin.  You can digest the emotions Kovic went through without being distracted with what a great acting job Cruise was doing.
This image from "Born" looks like the flag in "Saving Private Ryan".  The GIs
and Grunts fought and died for the same flag.  Why were they treated so
differently afterwards?

the trailer

   

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Coming Home (1978)


  


                 1978 was an interesting year for major motion pictures about the Vietnam War.  It was the first year that Hollywood felt that enough time had passed since the end of the war to make a commercially viable movie about it.  Holly wood jumped in feet first with “Coming Home” and “The Deer Hunter”.  Not only was a barrier broken, but a fierce competition ensued as the two vied for awards.  They also vied for the hearts of the public and critics.
                “Coming Home” was loosely based on the book by George Davis and was influenced by Jane Fonda’s friendship with Ron Kovic (Born on the Fourth of July).  It was a difficult production as director Hal Ashby was something of a nutcase.  It also took several writers to pen the screenplay (which surprisingly won the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay). 
                The movie opens in the spring of 1968 at a Veteran’s Hospital.  Actual vets improvise dialogue as Jon Voight (playing paraplegic Luke Martin) wisely sits and listens.  The war movie trope of a love triangle develops early as we are introduced to the typical military couple.  Capt. Bob Hyde (Bruce Dern) is a careerist who is headed for Vietnam so he can earn a promotion and to “see the elephant”.  Sally (Fonda) is the dutiful wife who according to Bob “doesn’t understand it all, but she accepts it”.  They seem to be happily married and Bob promises to be faithful.
before and after
                Sally feels liberated once Bob is gone and rooms with a hippie type named Vi (Penelope Milford) whose brother Billy (Robert Carradine) is in the Vet Hospital due to PTSD after only two weeks in Nam.  It only took two weeks to ruin this American youth’s life.  War sucks!  Sally visits the hospital and literally bumps into Luke.  It turns out they went to the same high school and yet hardly remember each other.  This in spite of him being the star quarterback and her having been the head cheerleader!  Credit given for cliché-busting (and reality-defying).  They get off to a rocky start as he is abusively belligerent about the shoddy treatment at the hospital and sees her as naively clueless.  I wondered if they would hook up because this was the first movie I ever watched.  Just kidding.
                Sally gets a job at the hospital.  All of the veterans are saintly as a contrast to the evil government that sent them off to fight a misbegotten war and then treated them shabbily upon their return.  Sally becomes an advocate for them and warms up to Luke.  Bob deserves a cinematic chance so Sally meets him in Hong Kong.  Things are chilly.  He is upset that she is working.  He is disillusioned with the war.  “TV shows what it’s like, but not what it is.”  The movie green lights the affair with Luke.
thank goodness VA hospitals now treat
wounded vets appropriately
                Luke moves out of the hospital because how will he have sex with Sally otherwise.  Plus we now need the war protesting angle to kick in.  Sure enough, Luke chains himself to the local Marine Corps gate.  Next comes the big sex scene which was groundbreaking due to one character being a crippled vet.  Compare this to the movies older brother, “The Best Years of Our Lives”.  In that movie, Homer does not get past first base on film.  Sally has never felt this way before (and has apparently never been on top before).  She has been liberated.  We know this because she no longer wears a bra.
                If only Bob would get himself killed in Vietnam.  Unfortunately he returns home after accidentally (?) shooting himself while going to the shower.  He carries the extra baggage of PTSD.  Sally and Bob try to return to their 1950s marriage.  This is not likely since she has evolved and he is now a tightly wound Cro-magnon.  “What the Hell did you do to your hair?!” 
                When Bob finds out about the affair, he confronts Luke but discovers that although he can shoot himself, he can’t bring himself to shoot the hippie who was screwing his wife while he was off dodging bullets for his promotion (I mean country).  Bob leaves because he’s seen enough movies to know how this ends.  Dueling scenes:  Luke talks to a high school class and Bob gets a medal.  Luke tells the students that “[I’m] here to tell you that I have killed for my country or whatever, and I don’t feel good about it.”  (At the Academy Awards, John Wayne  punched Voight in the nose, just kidding.)  Bob is ashamed for his decoration as we all should be.
                The movie does have its strengths.  The period music is great.  Classic rock rules!  The acting is outstanding.  Fonda, Voight, Dern, and Milford were all nominated for Oscars.  Voight defeated De Niro (“The Deer Hunter”), but Dern lost to Christopher Walken.  This was the year to be physically crippled instead of just emotionally and to be fully psycho instead of just PTSD.  The movie was also nominated for Best Picture, Director, Film Editing and won for Original Screenplay.
                The themes are a bit heavy-handed.  The repressed military wife is emancipated when her traditional husband goes off to war.  The antiwar movement also liberates her.  A crippled antiwar vet awakens her sexuality.  War = bad.  Antiwar = good.  The plot is rife with clichés and quite predictable.  It is extremely obvious that the marriage will not survive Bob going off to war.  On the plus side, the Sally character does ring true as a typical military wife who lives through her husband and is rudderless when he goes off to war.  Her transformation is not radical and she is realistically torn between the two men when her husband returns.  However, there is never a doubt who she will choose.  Keep in mind that her husband has been changed for the worst because of his experience and Luke has mellowed as their relationship has developed, so you would have chosen the same way she did.  Jane Fonda does an excellent job in a role that meant a lot to her and she could easily have gone overboard in forcing her opinions on the audience.  The movie is fairly well constrained.
               Looking back, it seems incredible that it was a horse race between "Coming Home" and "The Deer Hunter" for Best Picture.  Today one of those movies is considered to be a war movie classic and the other is considered to be a curio.  What war movie fan has a copy of "Coming Home" on his shelf?  But then again, if I had told you that in 1978 there had been a competition between a movie that was clearly a liberal view of the war and a movie that concludes with the cast singing "God Bless America", which would you have bet on for the Oscar?
              Cracker?  No.  It's a decent movie, but has not worn well over the years and is certainly not one of the 100 Best War Movies ever made.  It is not even in the top 5 Vietnam War movies.
grade =  B-