VS.
We
have finally reached the end of the tournament.
I have to admit it was not a thrilling one. There were a few minor upsets, but nothing
shocking. In the end, the two movies
that critics consider the best of the subgenre ended up in the finals. That was fairly predictable, especially for
“Das Boot”. Although suspense was
missing, I enjoyed the opportunity to visit this subgenre and pass on some
information about the various movies that comprise it. It is a subgenre that was once a thriving one
and occasionally returns as a branch of the action genre. In my process of preparing for the
tournament, I learned a lot about the history of WWII submarine warfare. It is fascinating to me and it was
interesting to see how submarine movies pass on that history. Unfortunately, knowledge of how submarines
fought makes enjoyment of the movies problematical. Submarine movies exist mainly because movie
makers see the potential for drama in a confined space. They usually are not concerned with tactical
or historical accuracy. This means that
what makes them entertaining for the masses makes them less so for history
buffs like me. As you can perceive by
following the tournament, I do not think there are very many good submarine
movies. However, the tournament did give
some recognition to some forgotten gems like “Above Us the Waves”, “We Dive at
Dawn”, and “Hell and High Water”.
Although there is only one great movie in the subgenre, there are some other
must-sees.
PLOT: Boot =
A Run = C
ACTING: Boot =
A+ Run = A
TACTICS: Boot =
B Run = F
CLICHES: Boot =
B Run = D
DIALOGUE: Boot =
B Run = B
ACTION: Boot =
B Run = B
SPECIAL EFFECTS: Boot =
C Run =
B
ACCURACY: Boot =
B Run = C
CHARACTERS: Boot =
A Run = B
REALISM: Boot =
A+ Run = D
SAILOR BEHAVIOR: Boot =
A+ Run =
C
ENTERTAINMENT: Boot = B Run = B
ENTERTAINMENT: Boot = B Run = B
DAS BOOT = 102
RUN SILENT = 81
ANALYSIS: No
one should be surprised by the winner of the tournament. “Das Boot” is an acclaimed movie that created
quite a stir when it came out in 1981.
It is an adaptation of one of the best submarine novels and it was in
the hands of a great director (Wolfgang Petersen) who was obsessed with the
quality of the production. The effort
that went into the film was amazing and it shows. The production costs were very high. Petersen assembled an ace cast and one hell
of a great cinematographer (Jost Vacano).
The movie was nominated for six Academy Awards including Director and
Adapted Screenplay. It still holds the
record for most nominations for a German film.
It has a 98% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Most importantly, as far as war movie buffs
are concerned, it avoided the clichés that make the subgenre so tiresome. It also avoided the requirements of the
action genre. Even though it came late
in the subgenre, it is a unique film.
“Run
Silent, Run Deep” should have been a worthy opponent. It is also based on a great novel, but in
this case the adaptation was poor. It
does have a decent cast and certainly star power with Gable and Lancaster. However, the director (Robert Wise) was not
sterling. The big problem with the film
is that in making the movie entertaining for the average viewer, it insults war
movie lovers. Not played for laughs, it
still provides them if you know submarine warfare. It is noteworthy that in spite of its flaws,
it made it to the finals. This speaks
volumes for the weakness of the subgenre.
Thank
you to everyone who followed the tournament.
I am self-motivated, but it is still nice to know someone is following. Now I have one year to ponder what the next
tournament will be.
Never a doubt...
ReplyDelete