Showing posts with label Iraq War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq War. Show all posts

Sunday, November 30, 2025

Redacted (2007)

 

            “Redacted” was directed and written by Brian De Palma. It’s a companion of his “Casualties of War”. This time the war crime occurs in Iraq. He based his screenplay on the Mahmudiyah killings in Mahmudiyah, Iraq. The movie cost only $5 million to make and it flopped, making only $782,000.

            PFC Salazar (Izzy  Diaz) enlists in the Army with the goal of eventually going to film school. He plans on making a documentary that he hopes will get him into the school. He carries a videocamera when he goes on patrols and other duties. One day when on duty at a checkpoint, Salazar is filming when an Iraqi car comes speeding up to the check point. PFC Flake opens fire, killing the pregnant woman who was being rushed to the hospital by her brother. Flake did not fire any warning shots, but the killing is declared justified by the rules of engagement. Flake shows no remorse, even when interviewed by Salazar for his film. Later, a popular sergeant is killed by an IED which puts the platoon on edge and looking for payback. Flake and another soldier make plans to visit a house where they noticed an attractive teenage girl. Salazar goes along to film even though it is apparent a war crime is likely.

            De Palma’s “Casulties of War” is a good movie with a similar plot about an actual war crime in Vietnam. This movie is nowhere near as good. It lays it on much thicker than the earlier film. De Palma has lost his game. The screenplay is ham-handed and shrill. The acting is amateurish by an unrecognized cast. It is supposed to be all footage from Salazar or a French documentary crew, but clearly some of it is not. So much for the gimmick. The raid is hard to swallow. Salazar comes along to film and Flake allows him to!

            Clearly, De Palma was trying to shine a light on American mistreatment of Iraqi civilians. God knows there was some, so the story is not clearly fictional. However, the execution dilutes the message with overt anti-Americanism. It doesn’t help credibility that the movie ends without a conclusion. It is not a surpise the film made no mark at the box office.

 

HISTORICAL ACCURACY:  The actual incident was worse than the film depicted. Flake was based on PFC Steven Green who was just flatout evil. He and four others raped the girl and killed her family. The story was passed on secondhand by a soldier who heard it from a soldier that Green told the story to. In a scene reminiscent of “Casualties of War”, the soldier was reamed by his commanding officer for ratting out other soldiers. He was told to drop it, but didn’t. The five were eventually arrested and all got long prison terms. Green committed suicide in prison.

            De Palma was criticized for depicting American soldiers in a poor light and conservatives encouraged Americans to boycott the film. The movie certainly is not pro-American, but it does not exaggerate what bad soldiers did in Iraq. And it is based on an actual incident. De Palma did not make up the incident. He used it to shine a light on American actions. Were Green and the other four typical? Of course not. But neither were the soldiers in “Casualties of War”. The big mistake De Palma made was not mentioning that justice was served in this case. Unlike in “Casualties”. And he may have had blood on his hands because of that. Because one result was a gunman killed two American soldiers in Frankfurt in 2011. He claimed he was getting revenge for a YouTube video he saw of American soldiers raping a teenage Iraqi. The video was a clip from the movie.

 

GRADE =  C

Friday, February 9, 2024

In the Loop (2009)


 

            “In the Loop” is a British black comedy about the Iraq War.  It was directed and co-written by Armando Iannucci.  He created the BBC series “The Thick of It”.  Much of the cast also appeared in the TV series, but only Peter Capaldi and Paul Higgins play the same character.  Iannucci created the American version of “The Thick of It”, the HBO series “VEEP”.  Iannucci flashed an ID card and told the guard he was from the BBC to get into the State Department.  He wandered around for several hours taking pictures to help the set designer.  The film was nominated for an Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay.  

            In the aftermath of 9/11, the Bush administration is laying the groundwork for an invasion of Iraq.  Bush is expecting Great Britain will participate in the war.  In London, Simon Foster (Tom Hollander), Minister for International Development, tells a reporter that “war is unforeseeable”.  Malcolm Tucker (Capaldi), the Prime Minister’s Director of Communications, is irate about the flub.  He is a modern spin-doctor.  It’s his job to sell Great Britain’s involvement in the war.  Tucker is the poster boy for apoplectic.  And for cursing.  He reams Foster which results in Foster doing damage control by telling the press that America and Britain will be “climbing the mountain of conflict”.  As ridiculous as that phrase is, the pro-war people turn it into a slogan.  The Prime Minister is planning on supporting the U.S., so everyone needs to be on board.  The main players shift to Washington where the Assistant Secretary of State and a general who is assistant to the Secretary of Defense (James Gandolfini) are trying to keep America out of the war.  There is a report on the pros and cons of going to war, with the cons outweighing the pros.  Tucker’s mission is to quash the report.

            If you are a political junkie, followed the Iraq War, or you are a fan of “VEEP”, you will enjoy this film.  It does help if you are familiar with the leadup to the war.  The movie is fictional, but it is based on the WMD evidence provided by Secretary of State Colin Powell at the United Nations.  You are not going to enjoy it if you are a Fox News viewer.  The film is bitingly critical of the Bush administration and its British allies. It is satire at its best and reminds of “Dr. Strangelove”.  The dialogue is brilliant.  It is high IQ humor and not for everyone.  The quantity and quality of jokes is huge.  It reminded me of the “MASH” tv series.   

The acting is outstanding.  Capaldi is hilarious as Tucker.  Tucker is possibly the funniest villain in war movie history.  He has the biggest potty mouth I have ever heard in a war movie.  I counted them, he uses the f-word 70 times!  The rest of the characters chip in 52 more.  The first cut of the film was 4.5 hours.  Imagine how many f-words were in that cut.  This may seem excessive, but I bet it is not far off from actual dialogue inside the Beltway.  And it is a realistic look behind the scenes.  This is how foreign policy works.  The movie does not rely on the shock value of four-letter words to produce laughs.  The cast is amazing and they did a lot of improv.  Gandolfini is perfect as the general.  His research included talking to some generals.   Here is a sample of some of the jokes:

 

Jamie McDonald:   See that fax?

Michael Rodgers: Yes.

Jamie MacDonald: That is your career. And I think it might be fucked, but let's just check. Yeah, yeah, it's pretty fucked. Now, I hope you can play the spoons, because you're too old to go back to being a gentleman's fluffer.

 

Simon Foster:  (after his “unforeseeable” remark)  That's not supposed to be out there...

Malcolm Tucker: Well, it is out there, it's out there now, lurking like a big hairy rapist at a coach station. You know, if I could, I'd punch you into paralysis!

 

Tucker:  Christ on a bendy-bus. Don't be such a fucking faff arse.

You won’t come away from watching it with more respect for politicians.  But then again, because of the Iraq War, trust in the U.S. government reached a new low.  When I used to teach the sinking of the USS Maine and how it was used to declare war on Spain, I would emphasize that this would not be the last time the public was not told the truth about the reason for going to war.  The Iraq War is just the latest example of manipulation of information to justify war.  You may have tears in your eyes from watching it.  Some of those tears will be from laughter and others from disgust for how Americans were duped into spending trillions of dollars and thousands of lives in a war that should not have occurred.  If that statement gets your goat, do not watch this movie.

GRADE  =  A


 

Thursday, January 13, 2022

THE BEST AND WORST OF 2021

 


 

 

Well, it's that time of the new year again.  It's been a pretty bad year for outstanding war movies, but a great year for bad movies.  I had to beat the bushes so much to find ten good war movies to tout that I have decided to do something unusual (but I make the rules, right?) and put a series at the top of my list.  It's the best thing I saw this year, so it deserves the recognition.  The rest of the list is full of movies that are not well known and are worth a watch.  I'm talking about the Best of 2021 list.  The other list, avoid at all costs.  Or binge watch them and you will be assured nothing will be worse in 2022.  Things can only go up.

The Long Road Home  (2017) 

                    “The Long Road Home” is a miniseries that aired on National Geographic in 2017.  It was based on the nonfiction book The Long Road Home:  A Story of War and Family by Martha Raddatz.  She chronicles the 1st Air Cavalry’s involvement in the Siege of Sadr City in 2004.  Specifically, it covers an event known as “Black Sunday” (known as Palm Sunday back in the States).  The eight 42-minute episodes were directed by either Phil Abraham or Mikael Salomon (who won an Emmy for two episodes of “Band of Brothers”).  The series was filmed with military cooperation at Ft. Hood in Texas.  Cooperation allowed for the use of the bases urban warfare site designed to prepare troops for combat in Iraqi cities. The production added buildings to conform to the alley and building where the platoon was pinned down.  Ft. Hood provided extras and several of the series characters were on set as technical advisers.

                    The series begins with a reminder that we invaded Iraq in 2003.  42 days after the invasion, Pres. Bush gave his famous “mission accomplished” speech.  The series will make it clear that that claim was premature.  On March 31, 2004, the 1st Air Cav was deployed to keep the peace in a section of Baghdad known as Sadr City.  They and their families were told it was “the safest place in Iraq”.  They were on a peace-keeping and reconstruction mission.  At first, this seemed accurate, but if it had held true, we wouldn’t have this miniseries.

                    The opening scene (as in the book) features a military hospital with graphic wounds.  This is not going to be a tame TV production.  Now that it has been established that Sadr City was not very safe, we flash back to the going away scene which establishes the format of intercutting from Iraq to the home front.  Each episode revolves around a member of the unit.  For example, the first episode is centered on Lt. Aguero (E.J. Bonilla).  His son is upset with his father going away because he feels his father’s primary loyalty is to his unit instead of his family.  The series will examine the family dynamic for several of the men.  The wives and kids had been assured the tour would be uneventful, but within four days of arrival in Baghdad, a sanitation support detail led by Aguero goes horribly wrong.  His platoon gets caught in the rebellion by a militia led by a religious leader named Al Sadr.  It’s a scenario similar to that of “Black Hawk Down” except that Aguero’s commanding officer Lt. Col. Volesky (Michael Kelly) had been optimistic about the future of the mission and thought “hearts and minds” was working.  Aguero’s Humvees are ambushed traveling through the streets and they have to take refuge in a house.  The rest of the series will concentrate on efforts to rescue them.  We will intercut between Aguero and those efforts.  Aguero’s situation acts as a microcosm of the Iraq situation.  He has an interpreter/collaborator named Jassim (Darius Homayoun) who gets his own episode which highlights the two sides of the Iraqi factionalism.  In the house that Aguero’s squad occupies, there is an Iraqi family that gives us the perspective of civilians in Sadr City. 

                    The second episode concentrates on Volesky, so the series spends time on command decisions.  Each episode begins with a flashback to the men and their families before they left Ft. Hood.  And then, as events transpire, the series intercuts back to the families as they deal with first the rumors and then the reality of what they’re soldiers are going through.  Episode three is about Capt. Denomy (Jason Ritter), who led the first attempt to reach Aguero.   His wife Gina (Kate Bosworth) and Volesky’s wife (Sarah Wayne Callies) are going to play roles similar to Julie Moore (Madeleine Stowe) and Barbara Geoghegan (Keri Russell) in “We Were Soldiers”.  Episode four is a showcase for Jeremy Sisto as Sgt. Miltenberger.  Miltenberger is suffering from PTSD from an incident in Kosovo a few years earlier.  He has to mother hen a platoon that goes into Sadr City in the back of a truck, which makes them armed sitting ducks.  Episode 5 is the Jassim episode.  We learn how he went from a Sadr disciple to working with the foreigners.  Episode 6 is the outlier as it tells the story of PFC. Young (Noel Fisher).  This episode is a flash-forward that explains how Young became a famous peace activist.  It includes his relationship with the most famous peace activist (and thorn in Pres. Bush’s side) Casey Sheehan.  Her son was killed in one of the rescue units.  Episode 7 features Sgt. Bourquin (Jon Beavers) who is Aguero’s second in command and offers a different perspective to Aguero’s “enlightened” approach to dealing with Iraqis.  The series closes with the rescue of Aguero’s men and the aftermath represented by SFC. Garza (Jorge Diaz). 

                    When I first learned that National Geographic was taking the plunge into a scripted war miniseries similar to HBO’s “Band of Brothers” and “Generation Kill”, I was skeptical.  I did not even know National Geographic showed anything beside documentaries.  It is not a network I watch.  (I love history, not geography.)  I made an exception for this series, partly to confirm my suspicion that it would be a low budget fiasco.  I was totally wrong.  This series holds it’s own with the best war miniseries.  It also does not embarrass itself when it dares to conjure memories of “Black Hawk Down” and “We Were Soldiers”.  It is closest to “Generation Kill”.  Both are set in Iraq.  GK follows a company during the invasion all the way to Baghdad and “The Long Walk Home” picks up about a year later.  While it has some combat scenes in it, GK is more about the interaction of the unit members.  TLWH focuses on one day of intense combat while blending in character studies and a look at the home front.  They make for excellent companions and the pairing would go a long way in educating one about the war in Iraq.

                    For a TV production which I assume did not have the funding of an HBO series, TLWH does not come off as shoddy in comparison to the far more costly “Band of Brothers”.  Use of Fort Hood has a lot to do with the verisimilitude.  The sets are great with the real-life base being used for the families and the Iraqi city mock-up standing in for Sadr City.  Veterans watching the series would probably remark on the lack of sewage in the streets, but otherwise it looks like the environment they fought in.  The screenwriters managed to set the series apart from the other war series I mentioned above by altering the format.  Basing each episode on a particular participant and starting with a flashback to give that person a back-story was an excellent decision.  The blending in of the family stories gives a depth you don’t get with “Generation Kill”, for instance.  The series is more heart-tugging because of this.  You get, not only some tragic deaths of men you get to know, but you see the reactions of their families.  The dual theme of these men have two families is fleshed out since the running time allows for it, moreso than in a movie.

                    The biggest surprise was the excellent combat.  And there is a lot of it.  The series is not combat porn, but it can be graphic and intense.  It is realistic, although the Americans tend to kill a lot more jihadists who are firing at them from buildings than they actually did that day.  The “fog of war” and FUBAR are readily apparent to the viewer.  And the credo “leave no man behind.”  In that respect, the series is closest to “Black Hawk Down” and sadly, it makes the case for the Army not having learned all the lessons from the Battle of Mogadishu.  It is mind-boggling to watch green troops riding into a hornet’s nest in the back of a truck with no protection, not even a canvas top.  The series does not take a stand on the justification for the war or the way the Pentagon fought it, but you can’t watch without thinking these men were put in an untenable position without proper resources.  The series does not demonize the insurrectionists.  Although there is no face given to the enemy, it is clear they are fighting against foreigners who they feel are trying to control them.  Jassim is a good representative of the tug of war that civilians were subjected to.  There is a powerful scene where innocent civilians are used as human shields by militants who are trying to wipe-out Aguero and his men.  He has to make the decision whether to open fire on the crowd.  It was that kind of war.

                    The acting is fine by a cast of mostly unknowns.  (Most of the cast do not have Wikipedia pages.)  The series did manage to get Michael Kelly, Jeremy Sisto, and Kate Bosworth for some caché.  It’s a big cast, but attention is taken to develop numerous characters.  Not just the eight that are featured in each episode.  Acting honors go to Bonilla, Fisher, and Homayoun, but the acting is solid across the board.

                    After I saw the series for the first time, I ordered the book by Raddatz.  I have to admit to a prejudice against women war historians, so I was just as skeptical about the book as I was about the series.  Especially since Raddatz is not an historian, but is a news correspondent.  I watched the series a second time to prepare this review and then read the book to see how much the series conforms to the book.  Raddatz’s book is excellent and an entertaining read.  The Siege of Sadr City was a significant event in Iraq, but sadly it occurred long after Americans stopped caring about the war.  I recommend the book to anyone who wants to be informed about the mess we got into over there and how it affected our servicemen and their families.  The series follows the book as closely as could be wanted.  Most of the incidents in the series are confirmed in the book, but there were some liberties taken.  I’ve already mentioned the higher than actual kill rate for the Americans.  The Miltenberger character was the exception to the effort to match the men with their actual person.  This was probably an effort to give Jeremy Sisto a more meaty role.  There are no huge tamperings with history.  The family in the Aguero house were made up, but this was to give Iraqi civilians generic representation.  The series has nothing as egregious as the final scene in “We Were Soldiers”.  There is no America kicks ass in the fourth quarter ending here.

                    Few people, even war movie fans, are aware of this excellent miniseries.  It was not widely viewed when it premiered, which is unfortunate because that will probably discourage other networks from attempting similar productions.  However, it is worth the search to view it now.  It is available on Hulu, YouTube TV, Sling, and Fubo.  You won’t regret watching it.

GRADE  =  A+

2.  The Breadwinner (2017) -  This animated feature is set in Afghanistan before the U.S. invasion.  The Taliban is making life medieval for women.  Parvana's goal it to get her father released from a prison he is sent to because he is a teacher.  She disguises herself as a boy to make money and move around freely.  Intercut in the story is the telling of a traditional Afghan folk tale about a heroic boy who must defeat the Elephant King (think "Jack and the Beanstalk").  It is in a different animation style.  It's one of the best animated war movies, and one of the best animated movies, period.

3.  The Painted Bird (2019) -  This is the odyssey of a young Jewish boy in Eastern Europe.  In a Holocaust subgenre that has little new to offer.  This is new.  It is a series of vignettes involving eccentric (mostly despicable) characters.  

4.  The Missiles of October (1974)This teleplay covers the Cuban Missile Crisis.  It bounces between Kennedy and his advisors and Khrushchev addressing the Politburo.  It has a docudrama feel to it, but with a strong cast.  It is as accurate as you could ask for and although the basics are well-known, it is still edge of your seat.

5.  Spectral (2016) -  This is an sci-fi action film that is set in the near future in a war-torn Eastern European nation.  A special ops team and a scientist are sent in to rescue a squad and they encounter a supernatural force that is resistant to normal weapons and kills with ease.  It is a wild ride.  

6.  Le Pantalon (1997) -  "The Pants" is a French movie that is their equivalent to "Paths of Glory".  A good soldier refuses to wear blood-stained uniform pants taken from a corpse.  He is then court-martialed for "disobedience in the face of the enemy"!  It's predictable, but powerful. 

7.  The Captain (2017)Set in the last days of WWII in Europe, a sad sack German soldier assumes the identity of a captain.  Power corrupts an already corrupt personality.  And if you had the balls, you could commit war crimes right up to the end.  It is a remarkably cynical movie that breaks the mold.

8.  At War as at War (1969) -  This Soviet film is set in 1943 and follows a tank destroyer crew as it battles German panzers.  It focuses on the young Lieutenant who is earning the respect of his men, but it is also a small unit movie.  It has some good tank combat in it.

9.  Mother Night (1996) -  Nick Nolte plays an American who is recruited as a spy in Nazi Germany.  His cover is as a Lord Haw Haw type radio personality who gives propaganda speeches.  He seemingly is not acting when he spouts anti-semitic bile.  After the war, he is relocated in NYC as a typical schlub.  This witness protection situation is going to end.  It's based on a Kurt Vonnegut story and he has a cameo.

10.  A Bright Shining Lie (1998) -  Bill Paxton plays John Vann.  This made-for-TV movie is based on Neil Sheehan's acclaimed nonfiction book.  Vann was a legendary figure from America's involvement in Vietnam.  He was a strong proponent of Vietnamization as he attempted to prove the South Vietnamese army could win the war.  Thus he was a tragic figure.

And now for the worst five movies I saw this past year.  

5.  Wheels of Terror (1987)  -  Also known as "The Misfits Brigade", this is based on Sven Hassel's penal battalion misfits.  It is treated as a comedy, or so it would seem.  A cast of dramatic actors play silly badly.  

4.  A Man Called Sarge (1990)This is a satire that ends up being a sadtire.  It stars Gary Krueger of Saturday Night Live "fame".  He and a group of stereotypes are  fighting Germans in North Africa.  Expect a lot of silly, but no laughs.

3.  Strike Commando (1987) -  This Macaroni Combat movie is a parody of Rambo.  A commando is betrayed by his boss, who sends him on a mission to find some POWs in Vietnam.  Our often shirtless hero has to deal with a Russian behemoth while expending a prodigious amount of ammo to kill a shit-load of bad guys.

2.  The Last Grenade (1970) -  This is a mercenary in Africa movie starring Stanley Baker.  He is out to eliminate his former mate Alex Cord.  Although the cast is a cut above a Macaroni Combat movie, that just makes the resulting fiasco that much sadder.

And snare drum roll please, here is the worst war movie that I watched this year.

1.  Fear and Desire (1953) -  This very low budget film was the debut for Stanley Kubrick.  He disowned it for good reason.  But unbelievably, some critics consider it a work of art.  It is more like a work of fart.  A big smelly one.