“Sands of Iwo
Jima” is the greatest recruiting film ever made by a branch of the
military.The U.S. Marine Corps gave
full cooperation to the film and had script approval.The movie was filmed at Camp Pendleton and
the Corps provided ample equipment.The
Marine Corps hierarchy knew that a successful film could possibly help it
survive potential demotion in the post-war years.Mission accomplished!In the process, the film bumped John Wayne up
to a screen icon and the great American cinematic soldier.It began his long run at the top of the box
office.
the greatest Marine ever
You know what you are getting
right off the bat as the “Marine Corps Hymn” plays over the credits.A voice-over informs us that this will be a
small unit movie.It is a heterogeneous
squad that is to be trained by the martinet Sgt. Stryker (Wayne).The squad consists of two squabbling brothers
(a running gag) – one of whom is Richard Jaekel (continuing his community
service of having to appear in every WWII combat movie).There is also an Italian wise-guy from Brooklyn
– thus fulfilling three of the required clichés.The unit has not one, but two conflicts.Thomas (Forrest Tucker) had been demoted by
Stryker and Conway (John Agar) is a pacifist with daddy issues who hates
Stryker because he stands in for his equally macho father.How could this impossibly dysfunctional unit
ever fight efficiently?Perhaps tough
love in training is the answer.
The training section of the film
establishes two themes.First, Stryker
is not one-dimensional.He has a broken
family, has not seen his kid in years, and he drinks to overcome his
unhappiness.Second, Stryker is a
“proper bastard” (as the British would say).He believes it is better to be feared than loved and the Marines need to
hate him more than the ”Nips” (their word).He rifle
butts an incompetent trainee.However,
to reassure the audience, the film tacks on an embarrassing scene where Stryker
teaches the guy how to stab Japs by dancing with him! (Come on, Duke!Hit him again, harder.)
kudos for the sweat!
The first combat set piece is
the Battle of Tarawa.The men are told
the Japanese Marines are tough and “they’d just as soon die as stick a nickel
in a juke box.”Huh?The invasion is fairly accurate with
amphtracs, the sea wall, the use of flame throwers, etc.The editor deftly blends in actual
footage.Three key plot developments
ensue.First, Stryker goes all John
Wayne and takes out a pill box with a satchel charge, thus establishing his
heroism.Second, Thomas lingers for
coffee on an ammunition run and this causes the loss of two squad members
(redemption anyone?).Third, that night
Stryker declines to allow anyone to go rescue a wounded Marine (?), thus
earning the increased enmity of the men, especially Conway.By the way, the audience is promised a night
banzai attack that inexplicably is not delivered.
Back in Hawaii, there is the
inevitable fisticuffs between Thomas and Stryker and of course, the inevitable
intervention by a higher officer followed by the inevitable non-snitching by
Thomas.Thomas gets his redemption when
he apologizes for his coffee break.Stryker accepts it and they move on.One redemption down.
Finally, after a mercifully
short romance and wedding for Conway, it’s off to Iwo Jima.On the transport, one of the Marines looks at
a picture of his gal.Stryker smiles at
him as though to say – “you stupid sap, you’re dead meat now”. “Saddle
up”,“hit the beach” and “lock and load”
(the first recorded use of this phrase).The fighting is 1940s war movie hellacious.Squad members die.Zoom in on a corpse’s book entitled “Our
Hearts Were Young and Gay”.One mortally
wounded gyrene jauntily says “I’ll get a good night’s sleep tonight”.They are dropping like flies.The deaths are not too Old School.There is little twirling or touchdown
signaling.Conway saves Stryker’s life
and suddenly the heat of combat has forged a bond.Redemption #2 accomplished.Conway has a premonition of death, but
Stryker doesn’t.Psych, audience!
preparing for the awesome night banzai attack that doesn't happen
The movie closes with the trek
up Mt. Suribachi.Stryker is given a
flag (the actual flag, donated by the Marine Corps) to raise, but first he has
to stupidly say “I’ve never felt so good in my life.How about a cigarette?”A Japanese sniper mistakes “cigarette” for
“bullet” and millions of American males are scarred for life. (But not as badly as Old Yeller.)In lieu of last dying words, a letter to his
son is read aloud.Jerk those
tears!The survivors watch the flag-raising
(which oddly is not the actual footage). Queue Marine Corps Hymn.Stop at the recruiting table on your way out
of the theater.
If you haven't seen the movie and don't want to be scarred, stop the movie now!
“Sands of Iwo Jima” certainly
falls into the Old School of war movies, but it is not the template that it is
often accused of.Although truly
pro-Marines, it is not overly patriotic or propagandistic.The Japanese are tamely called “Nips” and remain
faceless.They are not demonized.The movie does have several clichés,but it did not invent them.It would be too much to ask a 1949 movie to
forego the redemption angles, for instance.More importantly, iconoclasm would possibly have tampered with the
Marine Corps cooperation that kept the budget extremely reasonable.
cigarette's kill
The acting is solid.Wayne gives one of his great performances and
earned a Best Actor nod (competing with Peck of “Twelve O’Clock High”;both losing to Crawford of “All the King’s
Men”).His performance is nuanced and
although most remember Stryker as a one-dimensional supersergeant, he actually
has some very human flaws.The rest of
the cast is just there to carry Wayne’s combat boots.Agar does some scene-chewing and Tucker does
not embarrass himself.The actors were
put through a three day boot camp by a Marine DI at Camp Pendleton.This may have been a first.The stunt-casting of several real war heroes
(including the three surviving flag-raisers and David Shoup who earned the
Medal of Honor on Tarawa) is fun and emphasized to the public that Wayne was
just an actor who never fought in battle.Just kidding.
the movie's reenactment
The movie is technically
sound.The score is typical for a 1940s
war movie, but it is not intrusive and is sparingly used.The cinematography is nothing special, but
the editing in of the actual footage is outstanding.This movie possibly uses a higher percentage
of actual footage than any other WWII film.It deserved its Editing nomination as well as its Best Recording for its
realistic sounds of battle.The other
nomination was for its screenplay which was written by Harry Brown (“A Walk in
the Sun”) and Wayne’s friend James Edward Grant.The dialogue is not sappy and there are some
good lines.However, they certainly stay
within the box.
The movies’ themes include
camaraderie and the benefits of tough love.The movie is very predictable in its development of these themes.You get two redemption arcs that are both
sappy.The hatred of Stryker evolving
into respect is not exactly ground-breaking.On Iwo Jima, the film shifts to a “who will survive?” vibe.Thankfully, the deaths are not maudlin and
accurately reflect the randomness of death in battle.As with all war movies, the percentage of
deaths to wounded is shockingly high.But even the new VioLingo style of movies are noted for this.
The biggest flaw in the film and
the reason why I find it to be overrated is the lack of combat.The movie builds its raison d’etre around two
famous battles yet it shortchanges both.Tarawa lasted three days and was a fascinating first taste of a disputed
landing under extremely difficult combat conditions.The movie briefly dwells on the chaos at the
sea wall and throws in the pill box scene, but otherwise blows the chance to
show the horrors of that battle.The
film battle is much too easy.Bizarrely,
the screenwriters prepare the audience for action in the form of a night battle
and then simply move on to Hawaii!Big
letdown.Iwo Jima gets more coverage,
but again we get only the opening stages of the battle.The combat is PG-rated intense with
nongraphic deaths.Compare this to the
Iwo Jima episode of “The Pacific” and you can clearly see the vast difference
between Old School and VioLingo.
In conclusion, although I am not
willing to kiss it’s ass like many critics, “Sands” belongs on the Military
History 100 Greatest War Movies list.As
I have made my journey through that list, I have often been chagrined at some
of the inclusions and sometimes I just have to chalk it up to the panel putting
a high emphasis on the historical importance of the film.This might explain including films like “They
Were Expendable” and “Guadalcanal Diary”, but how do you explain an important
film like “Sands” being left out.Not
only is it better than many of the other films on the list (including the two
above), but you could argue it had a great influence on war films made in the
1950s.Certainly, Stryker is one of the
seminal war movie heroes.Seriously,
“Guadalcanal Diary” and not “Sands of Iwo Jima”?!Give me a break.
“Sands
of Iwo Jima” is a John Wayne movie and he gives one of his best performances.He was nominated for Best Actor.Sgt. Stryker became his most iconic role and
he brings the full force of his charisma to it.The character is a bit more dimensional than his cowboy characters.He gets to play tough, empathetic, drunk,
morose, heroic.He is outstanding.The supporting cast is adequate and very old
schoolish.John Agar is the “I can’t
live up to my dead father who happened to be a mentor for Stryker” so I will
hate Stryker instead guy.Forest Tucker
is the Stryker foe.Throw in an
aggravating Italian Brooklynite for dubious comic relief.The actual war heroes inserted into the cast
can best be described as “not actors”.
“When Trumpets Fade” is dominated by Ron Eldard as
the anti-hero David Manning.It is a
remarkable performance.The character is
far from stereotypical.He is a survivor
loaded with PTSD and a cynical anti-authority attitude who is thrust into an
authority position.Eldard plays him as
a guy who would have despised Stryker.The supporting cast is satisfactory.Martin Donovan is excellent as Capt. Pritchett.Zac Orth does good work as the "dead meat"
Sanderson.
FIRST QUARTER:
Sands of Iwo Jima8 When Trumpets Fade8
CLICHES:
“Sands of Iwo Jima” is not an iconoclastic movie.In fact, it helped set the template for war
movies until the 1960s.It begins with a dedication to
the Marine Corps (and is virtually a recruiting film).The unit is not as clearly defined as
heterogeneous as in many similar movies, but it is still a small unit
movie.You have a hero and a defined
mission (raising the flag).Conflict in
the unit (actually two – Stryker vs. Thomas, Stryker vs. Conway) is
resolved.You have the redemption in the
form of Conway who has daddy issues and is a reluctant warrior.You get rituals like a marriage and mail
call.
“When Trumpets Fade” was obviously made with
cliché-busting in mind.However, it is a
war movie so you do have some familiar elements.It has a dedication to the men who fought in
the Hurtgen Forest.There is a mission
(actually two), but reluctantly led by an anti-hero.You definitely have the leadership forced on
the main character trope, but the twist is that he fights against it and is
downright surly.Does Manning get
redemption?He would certainly have
sneered at that.There are no rituals
that I noticed.Kudos for reversing the
“fat guy with glasses must die” cliché.
HALFTIME SCORE: Sands of Iwo Jima14 When Trumpets Fade16 PLOT: “Sands of Iwo Jima” is your standard boot camp to
battle flic.Stryker inherits a motley
group of Marines and trains them in a tough love way for the realities of
battle.Meanwhile, conflicts within the
unit are developed so that combat can resolve them.There are two battle scenes.The first to establish heroism and the
realities of war (Tarawa).The second to show the
success of the unit evolution as it accomplishes a mission (Iwo Jima).The flow from training to off base to
training to combat is smooth and entertaining, if predictable.
“When Trumpets Fade” has an anti-hero thrust into
command of a squad of replacements.There is no training or bonding.Manning does not want to lead and does not care about his charges.The traditional early arc of a combat film is
dispensed with.The transitions are mainly
from Manning encountering authority to combat sequences.Similar to “Sands”, there are two main combat
scenes.Unlike “Sands”, these episodes
are basically the suicide mission variety.Both movies have the “who will survive?” vibe.
THIRD QUARTER: Sands of Iwo Jima 21 When Trumpets Fade25
COMBAT:
“Sands of Jima” has two big combat scenes- Tarawa and
Iwo Jima.In the first, Stryker takes
out a bunker in typical John Wayne fashion.Considering the potential inherent in the Battle of Tarawa, the movie is
surprisingly lacking in action.A
promised night banzai charge never materializes (WTF?) and only the first day of the
three day battle is shown.Big letdown.The Battle of Iwo Jima is more intense and
satisfying although it relies substantially on actual footage (but very well
used).The violence is very old school.There is little blood although we do get some
bullet wounds.Nothing women can’t
handle.However, men will probably cry
(you know what I’m talking about, guys).
“When Trumpets Fade” is from the VioLingo school
and intentionally pushes the envelope created by movies like “Sands”.It also has two major combat sequences.The first is the mission to take out the
artillery battery.Manning is forced to
shoot one of the replacements who has freaked out and is causing the rest to
panic.Sanderson uses a flamethrower to
roast the Germans.The second mission is
similar with the target being some emplaced tanks.This time grenades and Thompsons and Garands
are more de rigueur.The movie throws in
two larger group actions involving the graphic results of sustained artillery
fire. The wounds are graphic and bloody
and there are numerous delimbings.Plus
two losers of battles with flamethrowers.
FINAL SCORE: Sands of Iwo Jima27 When Trumpets Fade34
COLOR ANALYSIS: This was a great match-up between Old School and VioLingo. VioLingo is what I am trying out as my name for modern war movies that feature realistic violence and soldier talk and behavior. The two movies could not be more opposite. "Trumpets" is over the top in its "war is Hell" theme and "Sands" is one of the few war movies that is not definitively anti-war. It is almost like Stryker's death was written in because the director decided it was needed to soften the film's glamorization of war. Certainly, no one who watches "Trumpets" rushes out to join the Army, whereas many joined the Marines due to "Sands". Another fascinating match-up was that of hero Stryker vs. anti-hero Manning. The hero vs. anti-hero is a crucial difference between Old School and VioLingo. It will be interesting to see how future bouts between these schools will turn out. For example, "Guadalcanal Diary" against "Saving Private Ryan".